急性心肌梗死非罪魁祸首病变的功能或解剖学评价。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Eurointervention Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720
Xueming Xu, Chao Fang, Senqing Jiang, Yuzhu Chen, Jiawei Zhao, Sibo Sun, Yini Wang, Lulu Li, Dongxu Huang, Shuang Li, Huai Yu, Tao Chen, Jinfeng Tan, Xiaohui Liu, Jiannan Dai, Gary S Mintz, Bo Yu
{"title":"急性心肌梗死非罪魁祸首病变的功能或解剖学评价。","authors":"Xueming Xu, Chao Fang, Senqing Jiang, Yuzhu Chen, Jiawei Zhao, Sibo Sun, Yini Wang, Lulu Li, Dongxu Huang, Shuang Li, Huai Yu, Tao Chen, Jinfeng Tan, Xiaohui Liu, Jiannan Dai, Gary S Mintz, Bo Yu","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have reported the value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess the physiological significance of non-culprit lesions (NCLs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) to identify non-culprit vulnerable plaques.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to systematically compare long-term NCL-related clinical prognosis in an AMI population utilising acute Murray fractal law-based QFR (μQFR) values and OCT-defined TCFA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-vessel OCT imaging and μQFR assessment were conducted in 645 AMI patients, identifying 1,320 intermediate NCLs in non-infarct-related arteries. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, NCL-related non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and NCL-related unplanned coronary revascularisation, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint occurred in 59 patients (11.1%). OCT-defined TCFA independently predicted patient-level (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-5.19) and NCL-specific primary endpoints (adjusted HR 4.46, 95% CI: 2.33-8.56). The highest event rate of 29.6% was observed in patients with NCLs that were TCFA (+) with μQFR ≤0.80, compared to 16.3% in those that were also TCFA (+) but with μQFR>0.80, 6.0% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR ≤0.80, and 6.6% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR>0.80 (log-rank p<0.001). TCFA was an independent predictor for the primary endpoint in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI; adjusted HR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.67-6.41) and non-STEMI (adjusted HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.24-8.54) patients, whereas μQFR ≤0.80 was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When assessing NCLs during the index procedure in AMI patients, OCT-defined TCFA serves as the dominant prognostic predictor for long-term clinical outcomes, rather than μQFR-determined physiological significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 4","pages":"e217-e228"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional or anatomical assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Xueming Xu, Chao Fang, Senqing Jiang, Yuzhu Chen, Jiawei Zhao, Sibo Sun, Yini Wang, Lulu Li, Dongxu Huang, Shuang Li, Huai Yu, Tao Chen, Jinfeng Tan, Xiaohui Liu, Jiannan Dai, Gary S Mintz, Bo Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have reported the value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess the physiological significance of non-culprit lesions (NCLs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) to identify non-culprit vulnerable plaques.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to systematically compare long-term NCL-related clinical prognosis in an AMI population utilising acute Murray fractal law-based QFR (μQFR) values and OCT-defined TCFA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-vessel OCT imaging and μQFR assessment were conducted in 645 AMI patients, identifying 1,320 intermediate NCLs in non-infarct-related arteries. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, NCL-related non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and NCL-related unplanned coronary revascularisation, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint occurred in 59 patients (11.1%). OCT-defined TCFA independently predicted patient-level (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-5.19) and NCL-specific primary endpoints (adjusted HR 4.46, 95% CI: 2.33-8.56). The highest event rate of 29.6% was observed in patients with NCLs that were TCFA (+) with μQFR ≤0.80, compared to 16.3% in those that were also TCFA (+) but with μQFR>0.80, 6.0% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR ≤0.80, and 6.6% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR>0.80 (log-rank p<0.001). TCFA was an independent predictor for the primary endpoint in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI; adjusted HR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.67-6.41) and non-STEMI (adjusted HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.24-8.54) patients, whereas μQFR ≤0.80 was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When assessing NCLs during the index procedure in AMI patients, OCT-defined TCFA serves as the dominant prognostic predictor for long-term clinical outcomes, rather than μQFR-determined physiological significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurointervention\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"e217-e228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809226/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurointervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往的研究报道了定量血流比(QFR)在评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者非罪魁祸首病变(NCLs)的生理意义,以及光学相干断层扫描(OCT)定义的薄帽纤维粥样瘤(TCFA)在识别非罪魁祸首易损斑块方面的价值。目的:我们试图利用基于急性Murray分形定律的QFR (μQFR)值和oct定义的TCFA值,系统地比较AMI人群中ncl相关的长期临床预后。方法:对645例AMI患者进行三血管OCT成像和μQFR评估,鉴定1320例非梗死相关动脉的中间ncl。主要终点为心源性死亡、非致命性心肌梗死(MI)和非致命性冠脉血管重建术,随访时间长达5年。结果:59例(11.1%)患者出现主要终点。oct定义的TCFA独立预测患者水平(校正风险比[HR] 3.05, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.80-5.19)和ncl特异性主要终点(校正风险比4.46,95% CI: 2.33-8.56)。TCFA(+)且μQFR≤0.80的nclc患者的事件发生率最高,为29.6%,而TCFA(+)但μQFR>为0.80的nclc患者的事件发生率为16.3%,TCFA(-)且μQFR≤0.80的nclc患者的事件发生率为6.0%,TCFA(-)且μQFR>为0.80的nclc患者的事件发生率为6.6% (log-rank p)。当在AMI患者的指数过程中评估ncl时,oct定义的TCFA作为长期临床结果的主要预后预测因子,而不是μ qfr确定的生理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Functional or anatomical assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction.

Background: Previous studies have reported the value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess the physiological significance of non-culprit lesions (NCLs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) to identify non-culprit vulnerable plaques.

Aims: We sought to systematically compare long-term NCL-related clinical prognosis in an AMI population utilising acute Murray fractal law-based QFR (μQFR) values and OCT-defined TCFA.

Methods: Three-vessel OCT imaging and μQFR assessment were conducted in 645 AMI patients, identifying 1,320 intermediate NCLs in non-infarct-related arteries. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, NCL-related non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and NCL-related unplanned coronary revascularisation, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years.

Results: The primary endpoint occurred in 59 patients (11.1%). OCT-defined TCFA independently predicted patient-level (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-5.19) and NCL-specific primary endpoints (adjusted HR 4.46, 95% CI: 2.33-8.56). The highest event rate of 29.6% was observed in patients with NCLs that were TCFA (+) with μQFR ≤0.80, compared to 16.3% in those that were also TCFA (+) but with μQFR>0.80, 6.0% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR ≤0.80, and 6.6% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR>0.80 (log-rank p<0.001). TCFA was an independent predictor for the primary endpoint in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI; adjusted HR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.67-6.41) and non-STEMI (adjusted HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.24-8.54) patients, whereas μQFR ≤0.80 was not.

Conclusions: When assessing NCLs during the index procedure in AMI patients, OCT-defined TCFA serves as the dominant prognostic predictor for long-term clinical outcomes, rather than μQFR-determined physiological significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Early outcomes of redo-TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 platform: the prospective, multicentre ReTAVI registry. TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios. Feasibility and challenges of the UNICORN technique in native aortic valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation. First-in-human experience with a heterotopic cross-caval transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement. Fenestration and TAP stenting to restore side branch flow after covered stent implantation for coronary perforation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1