Peng Huang, Jiawen Shang, Yuhan Fan, Zhixing Chang, Yingjie Xu, Ke Zhang, Zhihui Hu, Jianrong Dai, Hui Yan
{"title":"深度生成模型在调强放疗方案评审中的应用。","authors":"Peng Huang, Jiawen Shang, Yuhan Fan, Zhixing Chang, Yingjie Xu, Ke Zhang, Zhihui Hu, Jianrong Dai, Hui Yan","doi":"10.1002/mp.17704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Plan review is critical for safely delivering radiation dose to a patient under radiotherapy and mainly performed by medical physicist in routine clinical practice. Recently, the deep-learning models have been used to assist this manual process. As black-box models the reason for their predictions are unknown. Thus, it is important to improve the model interpretability to make them more reliable for clinical deployment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To alleviate this issue, a deep generative model, adversarial autoencoder networks (AAE), was employed to automatically detect anomalies in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The typical plan parameters (collimator position, gantry angle, monitor unit, etc.) were collected to form a feature vector for the training sample. The reconstruction error was the difference between the output and input of the model. Based on the distribution of reconstruction errors of the training samples, a detection threshold was determined. For a test plan, its reconstruction error obtained by the learned model was compared with the threshold to determine its category (anomaly or regular). The model was tested with four network settings. It was also compared with the vanilla AE and the other six classic models. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with other statistical metrics was employed for evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The AAE model achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.997). The AUCs of the other seven classic methods are 0.935 (AE), 0.981 (K-means), 0.896 (principle component analysis), 0.978 (one-class support vector machine), 0.934 (local outlier factor), and 0.944 (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise), and 0.882 (isolation forest). This indicates that AAE model could detect more anomalous plans with less false positive rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The AAE model can effectively detect anomaly in radiotherapy plans for lung cancer patients. Comparing with the vanialla AE and other classic detection models, the AAE model is more accurate and transparent. The proposed AAE model can improve the interpretability of the results for radiotherapy plan review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 6","pages":"4630-4641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying deep generative model in plan review of intensity modulated radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Peng Huang, Jiawen Shang, Yuhan Fan, Zhixing Chang, Yingjie Xu, Ke Zhang, Zhihui Hu, Jianrong Dai, Hui Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plan review is critical for safely delivering radiation dose to a patient under radiotherapy and mainly performed by medical physicist in routine clinical practice. Recently, the deep-learning models have been used to assist this manual process. As black-box models the reason for their predictions are unknown. Thus, it is important to improve the model interpretability to make them more reliable for clinical deployment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To alleviate this issue, a deep generative model, adversarial autoencoder networks (AAE), was employed to automatically detect anomalies in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The typical plan parameters (collimator position, gantry angle, monitor unit, etc.) were collected to form a feature vector for the training sample. The reconstruction error was the difference between the output and input of the model. Based on the distribution of reconstruction errors of the training samples, a detection threshold was determined. For a test plan, its reconstruction error obtained by the learned model was compared with the threshold to determine its category (anomaly or regular). The model was tested with four network settings. It was also compared with the vanilla AE and the other six classic models. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with other statistical metrics was employed for evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AAE model achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.997). The AUCs of the other seven classic methods are 0.935 (AE), 0.981 (K-means), 0.896 (principle component analysis), 0.978 (one-class support vector machine), 0.934 (local outlier factor), and 0.944 (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise), and 0.882 (isolation forest). This indicates that AAE model could detect more anomalous plans with less false positive rate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AAE model can effectively detect anomaly in radiotherapy plans for lung cancer patients. Comparing with the vanialla AE and other classic detection models, the AAE model is more accurate and transparent. The proposed AAE model can improve the interpretability of the results for radiotherapy plan review.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"4630-4641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applying deep generative model in plan review of intensity modulated radiotherapy
Background
Plan review is critical for safely delivering radiation dose to a patient under radiotherapy and mainly performed by medical physicist in routine clinical practice. Recently, the deep-learning models have been used to assist this manual process. As black-box models the reason for their predictions are unknown. Thus, it is important to improve the model interpretability to make them more reliable for clinical deployment.
Purpose
To alleviate this issue, a deep generative model, adversarial autoencoder networks (AAE), was employed to automatically detect anomalies in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.
Methods
The typical plan parameters (collimator position, gantry angle, monitor unit, etc.) were collected to form a feature vector for the training sample. The reconstruction error was the difference between the output and input of the model. Based on the distribution of reconstruction errors of the training samples, a detection threshold was determined. For a test plan, its reconstruction error obtained by the learned model was compared with the threshold to determine its category (anomaly or regular). The model was tested with four network settings. It was also compared with the vanilla AE and the other six classic models. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with other statistical metrics was employed for evaluation.
Results
The AAE model achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.997). The AUCs of the other seven classic methods are 0.935 (AE), 0.981 (K-means), 0.896 (principle component analysis), 0.978 (one-class support vector machine), 0.934 (local outlier factor), and 0.944 (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise), and 0.882 (isolation forest). This indicates that AAE model could detect more anomalous plans with less false positive rate.
Conclusions
The AAE model can effectively detect anomaly in radiotherapy plans for lung cancer patients. Comparing with the vanialla AE and other classic detection models, the AAE model is more accurate and transparent. The proposed AAE model can improve the interpretability of the results for radiotherapy plan review.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.