深度生成模型在调强放疗方案评审中的应用。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/mp.17704
Peng Huang, Jiawen Shang, Yuhan Fan, Zhixing Chang, Yingjie Xu, Ke Zhang, Zhihui Hu, Jianrong Dai, Hui Yan
{"title":"深度生成模型在调强放疗方案评审中的应用。","authors":"Peng Huang,&nbsp;Jiawen Shang,&nbsp;Yuhan Fan,&nbsp;Zhixing Chang,&nbsp;Yingjie Xu,&nbsp;Ke Zhang,&nbsp;Zhihui Hu,&nbsp;Jianrong Dai,&nbsp;Hui Yan","doi":"10.1002/mp.17704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Plan review is critical for safely delivering radiation dose to a patient under radiotherapy and mainly performed by medical physicist in routine clinical practice. Recently, the deep-learning models have been used to assist this manual process. As black-box models the reason for their predictions are unknown. Thus, it is important to improve the model interpretability to make them more reliable for clinical deployment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To alleviate this issue, a deep generative model, adversarial autoencoder networks (AAE), was employed to automatically detect anomalies in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The typical plan parameters (collimator position, gantry angle, monitor unit, etc.) were collected to form a feature vector for the training sample. The reconstruction error was the difference between the output and input of the model. Based on the distribution of reconstruction errors of the training samples, a detection threshold was determined. For a test plan, its reconstruction error obtained by the learned model was compared with the threshold to determine its category (anomaly or regular). The model was tested with four network settings. It was also compared with the vanilla AE and the other six classic models. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with other statistical metrics was employed for evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The AAE model achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.997). The AUCs of the other seven classic methods are 0.935 (AE), 0.981 (K-means), 0.896 (principle component analysis), 0.978 (one-class support vector machine), 0.934 (local outlier factor), and 0.944 (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise), and 0.882 (isolation forest). This indicates that AAE model could detect more anomalous plans with less false positive rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The AAE model can effectively detect anomaly in radiotherapy plans for lung cancer patients. Comparing with the vanialla AE and other classic detection models, the AAE model is more accurate and transparent. The proposed AAE model can improve the interpretability of the results for radiotherapy plan review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 6","pages":"4630-4641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying deep generative model in plan review of intensity modulated radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Peng Huang,&nbsp;Jiawen Shang,&nbsp;Yuhan Fan,&nbsp;Zhixing Chang,&nbsp;Yingjie Xu,&nbsp;Ke Zhang,&nbsp;Zhihui Hu,&nbsp;Jianrong Dai,&nbsp;Hui Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plan review is critical for safely delivering radiation dose to a patient under radiotherapy and mainly performed by medical physicist in routine clinical practice. Recently, the deep-learning models have been used to assist this manual process. As black-box models the reason for their predictions are unknown. Thus, it is important to improve the model interpretability to make them more reliable for clinical deployment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To alleviate this issue, a deep generative model, adversarial autoencoder networks (AAE), was employed to automatically detect anomalies in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The typical plan parameters (collimator position, gantry angle, monitor unit, etc.) were collected to form a feature vector for the training sample. The reconstruction error was the difference between the output and input of the model. Based on the distribution of reconstruction errors of the training samples, a detection threshold was determined. For a test plan, its reconstruction error obtained by the learned model was compared with the threshold to determine its category (anomaly or regular). The model was tested with four network settings. It was also compared with the vanilla AE and the other six classic models. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with other statistical metrics was employed for evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AAE model achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.997). The AUCs of the other seven classic methods are 0.935 (AE), 0.981 (K-means), 0.896 (principle component analysis), 0.978 (one-class support vector machine), 0.934 (local outlier factor), and 0.944 (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise), and 0.882 (isolation forest). This indicates that AAE model could detect more anomalous plans with less false positive rate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AAE model can effectively detect anomaly in radiotherapy plans for lung cancer patients. Comparing with the vanialla AE and other classic detection models, the AAE model is more accurate and transparent. The proposed AAE model can improve the interpretability of the results for radiotherapy plan review.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"4630-4641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在常规临床实践中,计划审查是放射治疗患者安全给药的关键,主要由医学物理学家完成。最近,深度学习模型被用于辅助这一手动过程。作为黑箱模型,其预测的原因是未知的。因此,提高模型的可解释性,使其更可靠地用于临床部署是很重要的。目的:为了缓解这一问题,采用深度生成模型——对抗自编码器网络(AAE)来自动检测调强放疗计划中的异常。方法:收集典型平面参数(准直器位置、龙门角度、监控单元等),形成训练样本的特征向量。重建误差是模型的输出和输入之间的差。根据训练样本的重构误差分布,确定检测阈值。对于测试计划,将学习模型得到的重构误差与阈值进行比较,确定测试计划的类别(异常或规则)。通过四种网络设置对模型进行了测试。并与香草AE和其他六种经典型号进行了比较。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)及其他统计指标进行评价。结果:AAE模型准确度最高(AUC = 0.997)。其他7种经典方法的auc分别为0.935 (AE)、0.981 (K-means)、0.896(主成分分析)、0.978(一类支持向量机)、0.934(局部离群因子)、0.944(含噪声应用的分层密度空间聚类)和0.882(隔离森林)。这说明AAE模型可以检测出更多的异常平面,假阳性率更低。结论:AAE模型能有效检测肺癌患者放疗方案中的异常。与普通声发射等经典探测模型相比,AAE模型更加准确、透明。提出的AAE模型可以提高结果的可解释性,为放疗计划的评审提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying deep generative model in plan review of intensity modulated radiotherapy

Background

Plan review is critical for safely delivering radiation dose to a patient under radiotherapy and mainly performed by medical physicist in routine clinical practice. Recently, the deep-learning models have been used to assist this manual process. As black-box models the reason for their predictions are unknown. Thus, it is important to improve the model interpretability to make them more reliable for clinical deployment.

Purpose

To alleviate this issue, a deep generative model, adversarial autoencoder networks (AAE), was employed to automatically detect anomalies in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans.

Methods

The typical plan parameters (collimator position, gantry angle, monitor unit, etc.) were collected to form a feature vector for the training sample. The reconstruction error was the difference between the output and input of the model. Based on the distribution of reconstruction errors of the training samples, a detection threshold was determined. For a test plan, its reconstruction error obtained by the learned model was compared with the threshold to determine its category (anomaly or regular). The model was tested with four network settings. It was also compared with the vanilla AE and the other six classic models. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) along with other statistical metrics was employed for evaluation.

Results

The AAE model achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.997). The AUCs of the other seven classic methods are 0.935 (AE), 0.981 (K-means), 0.896 (principle component analysis), 0.978 (one-class support vector machine), 0.934 (local outlier factor), and 0.944 (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise), and 0.882 (isolation forest). This indicates that AAE model could detect more anomalous plans with less false positive rate.

Conclusions

The AAE model can effectively detect anomaly in radiotherapy plans for lung cancer patients. Comparing with the vanialla AE and other classic detection models, the AAE model is more accurate and transparent. The proposed AAE model can improve the interpretability of the results for radiotherapy plan review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A coincidence-based response matrix for correction of charge sharing spectral distortions in photon counting detectors Evaluating the role of plan complexity metrics in online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients Comparison of deep learning and particle smoother EM methods for estimation of Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET kinetic parameters A constraint-normalized robustness index for HDR brachytherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1