新批准的药物是否有更差的安全性?免疫调节药物治疗类风湿关节炎关键安全结局风险的时间趋势研究

IF 24 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.020
Viktor Molander, Hannah Bower, Thomas Frisell, Johan Askling
{"title":"新批准的药物是否有更差的安全性?免疫调节药物治疗类风湿关节炎关键安全结局风险的时间趋势研究","authors":"Viktor Molander, Hannah Bower, Thomas Frisell, Johan Askling","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate rates of key safety outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and in reference cohorts, presented over time since the market entry of each b/tsDMARD class and over calendar period at treatment start.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide register-based cohort study conducted from 2006 to 2022. From the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register and national registers, we identified treatment initiators of b/tsDMARDs (n = 33,550 initiations), an early bionaive RA cohort (n = 16,011), and a matched general population cohort (n = 111,074). The main outcome was first of either major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, cancer, or serious infection. We stratified rates by time since market entry of each b/tsDMARD class at treatment start, and by calendar year of treatment start. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression and adjusted for patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 5862 events were observed in the b/tsDMARD initiator cohort. b/tsDMARD treatments initiated >5 (vs <2) years since market entry of that class were associated with lower outcome rates (unadjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81). This association was attenuated once adjusting for patient characteristics (adjusted HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.84-1.03). By contrast, during our study period, adjusted rates declined (adjusted HR = 0.74 and 95% CI = 0.69-0.80 for b/tsDMARDs initiated 2016-2021 vs 2006-2010), despite a constant rate in the background population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modest channelling makes the safety profile of b/tsDMARDs appear worse when new on the market. Declining incidences of typical RA comorbidities in b/tsDMARD initiators during recent years suggest that the bar defining an \"acceptable\" safety profile for new b/tsDMARDs for use in RA should be lower(ed).</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"716-725"},"PeriodicalIF":24.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do newly approved drugs have a worse observed safety profile than once established? A study on time trends in risks of key safety outcomes with immunomodulatory drugs against rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Molander, Hannah Bower, Thomas Frisell, Johan Askling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate rates of key safety outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and in reference cohorts, presented over time since the market entry of each b/tsDMARD class and over calendar period at treatment start.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide register-based cohort study conducted from 2006 to 2022. From the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register and national registers, we identified treatment initiators of b/tsDMARDs (n = 33,550 initiations), an early bionaive RA cohort (n = 16,011), and a matched general population cohort (n = 111,074). The main outcome was first of either major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, cancer, or serious infection. We stratified rates by time since market entry of each b/tsDMARD class at treatment start, and by calendar year of treatment start. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression and adjusted for patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 5862 events were observed in the b/tsDMARD initiator cohort. b/tsDMARD treatments initiated >5 (vs <2) years since market entry of that class were associated with lower outcome rates (unadjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81). This association was attenuated once adjusting for patient characteristics (adjusted HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.84-1.03). By contrast, during our study period, adjusted rates declined (adjusted HR = 0.74 and 95% CI = 0.69-0.80 for b/tsDMARDs initiated 2016-2021 vs 2006-2010), despite a constant rate in the background population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modest channelling makes the safety profile of b/tsDMARDs appear worse when new on the market. Declining incidences of typical RA comorbidities in b/tsDMARD initiators during recent years suggest that the bar defining an \\\"acceptable\\\" safety profile for new b/tsDMARDs for use in RA should be lower(ed).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"716-725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者开始使用生物/靶向合成疾病改善抗风湿药物(b/tsDMARD)和参考队列的关键安全性结局率,这些结果是自每种b/tsDMARD进入市场以来的一段时间内和治疗开始时的日历期间内呈现的。方法:这是一项2006年至2022年在全国范围内进行的基于登记的队列研究。从瑞典风湿病质量登记和国家登记中,我们确定了b/tsDMARDs的治疗起始者(n = 33,550例起始者),一个早期生物源性RA队列(n = 16,011)和一个匹配的普通人群队列(n = 111,074)。主要结局首先是主要不良心血管事件、静脉血栓栓塞、癌症或严重感染。我们根据治疗开始时每个b/tsDMARD类别进入市场的时间和治疗开始的日历年对发病率进行分层。我们使用Cox回归计算发病率(IRs)和风险比(hr),并根据患者特征进行调整。结果:总体而言,b/tsDMARD启动者队列中观察到5862例事件。b/tsDMARD治疗于2010年开始(vs .结论:适度的通道使得b/tsDMARD的安全性在新上市时显得更差。近年来,b/tsDMARD启动者中典型RA合并症的发生率下降,这表明定义用于RA的新b/tsDMARD“可接受”安全性概况的标准应该降低(ed)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do newly approved drugs have a worse observed safety profile than once established? A study on time trends in risks of key safety outcomes with immunomodulatory drugs against rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives: To investigate rates of key safety outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and in reference cohorts, presented over time since the market entry of each b/tsDMARD class and over calendar period at treatment start.

Methods: This was a nationwide register-based cohort study conducted from 2006 to 2022. From the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register and national registers, we identified treatment initiators of b/tsDMARDs (n = 33,550 initiations), an early bionaive RA cohort (n = 16,011), and a matched general population cohort (n = 111,074). The main outcome was first of either major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, cancer, or serious infection. We stratified rates by time since market entry of each b/tsDMARD class at treatment start, and by calendar year of treatment start. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression and adjusted for patient characteristics.

Results: Overall, 5862 events were observed in the b/tsDMARD initiator cohort. b/tsDMARD treatments initiated >5 (vs <2) years since market entry of that class were associated with lower outcome rates (unadjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81). This association was attenuated once adjusting for patient characteristics (adjusted HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.84-1.03). By contrast, during our study period, adjusted rates declined (adjusted HR = 0.74 and 95% CI = 0.69-0.80 for b/tsDMARDs initiated 2016-2021 vs 2006-2010), despite a constant rate in the background population.

Conclusions: Modest channelling makes the safety profile of b/tsDMARDs appear worse when new on the market. Declining incidences of typical RA comorbidities in b/tsDMARD initiators during recent years suggest that the bar defining an "acceptable" safety profile for new b/tsDMARDs for use in RA should be lower(ed).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
期刊最新文献
A pathogenic gut lipoglycan drives systemic thromboinflammation in lupus nephritis. Genetic biomarkers of clinical manifestations in giant cell arteritis define distinct patient subgroups. PD-1 signalling restrains pathogenic T peripheral helper and effector CD4⁺ T cell functions in rheumatoid arthritis. A data-driven, weighted flare score that accurately predicts organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Remission of refractory lupus nephritis is temporally associated with antitumour therapy, including durvalumab for endometrial carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1