局灶性癫痫间期脑电图放电的继发性双侧同步:患病率及相关因素。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1446471
Polina Specktor, Ronen Spierer, Mark Katson, Moshe Herskovitz
{"title":"局灶性癫痫间期脑电图放电的继发性双侧同步:患病率及相关因素。","authors":"Polina Specktor, Ronen Spierer, Mark Katson, Moshe Herskovitz","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1446471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epilepsy is commonly categorized based on etiology, treatment, and prognosis. Misclassification can occur due to the presence of interictal secondary bilateral synchronization (SBS) discharges seen on an electroencephalogram (EEG), misleading the classification process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the prevalence of interictal SBS discharges in patients with focal epilepsy and to identify predictors of these discharges.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent long-term video EEG monitoring (LTVEM) from August 2001 to May 2014.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with focal epilepsy. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had SBS discharges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 1,017 patients who underwent LTVEM. Of the 221 patients included in the final analysis, 36 (16%) exhibited SBS discharges. Patients in the SBS group were younger and had an earlier onset age of epilepsy. They also had higher rates of unclear seizure onset zone and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. In the binary logistic regression analysis, young onset age of epilepsy was the only significant factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of SBS discharges in focal epilepsy is relatively high (16%), emphasizing the importance of cautious interpretation of interictal EEG in epilepsy classification. Young age of disease onset is associated with higher rates of SBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1446471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary bilateral synchronization of interictal EEG discharges in focal epilepsy: prevalence and associated factors.\",\"authors\":\"Polina Specktor, Ronen Spierer, Mark Katson, Moshe Herskovitz\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2025.1446471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epilepsy is commonly categorized based on etiology, treatment, and prognosis. Misclassification can occur due to the presence of interictal secondary bilateral synchronization (SBS) discharges seen on an electroencephalogram (EEG), misleading the classification process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the prevalence of interictal SBS discharges in patients with focal epilepsy and to identify predictors of these discharges.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent long-term video EEG monitoring (LTVEM) from August 2001 to May 2014.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with focal epilepsy. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had SBS discharges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 1,017 patients who underwent LTVEM. Of the 221 patients included in the final analysis, 36 (16%) exhibited SBS discharges. Patients in the SBS group were younger and had an earlier onset age of epilepsy. They also had higher rates of unclear seizure onset zone and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. In the binary logistic regression analysis, young onset age of epilepsy was the only significant factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of SBS discharges in focal epilepsy is relatively high (16%), emphasizing the importance of cautious interpretation of interictal EEG in epilepsy classification. Young age of disease onset is associated with higher rates of SBS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1446471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1446471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1446471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癫痫通常根据病因、治疗和预后进行分类。由于脑电图(EEG)上出现间隙性继发性双侧同步(SBS)放电,可能会发生误分类,误导分类过程。目的:探讨局灶性癫痫患者间期SBS放电的发生率,并探讨其预测因素。设计:回顾性分析2001年8月至2014年5月接受长期视频脑电图监测(LTVEM)的患者。方法:纳入局灶性癫痫患者。患者根据是否有SBS出院被分为两组。结果:1017例患者行LTVEM。在最终分析的221例患者中,36例(16%)出现SBS出院。SBS组患者更年轻,癫痫发作年龄更早。他们也有较高的发生率不明确的癫痫发作区和局灶到双侧强直阵挛发作。在二元logistic回归分析中,癫痫发病年龄小是唯一的显著因素。结论:局灶性癫痫中SBS放电发生率较高(16%),强调对癫痫分型中间隔期脑电图的谨慎解读的重要性。发病年龄越小,SBS发病率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secondary bilateral synchronization of interictal EEG discharges in focal epilepsy: prevalence and associated factors.

Background: Epilepsy is commonly categorized based on etiology, treatment, and prognosis. Misclassification can occur due to the presence of interictal secondary bilateral synchronization (SBS) discharges seen on an electroencephalogram (EEG), misleading the classification process.

Objective: To examine the prevalence of interictal SBS discharges in patients with focal epilepsy and to identify predictors of these discharges.

Design: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent long-term video EEG monitoring (LTVEM) from August 2001 to May 2014.

Methods: We included patients with focal epilepsy. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had SBS discharges.

Results: We found 1,017 patients who underwent LTVEM. Of the 221 patients included in the final analysis, 36 (16%) exhibited SBS discharges. Patients in the SBS group were younger and had an earlier onset age of epilepsy. They also had higher rates of unclear seizure onset zone and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. In the binary logistic regression analysis, young onset age of epilepsy was the only significant factor.

Conclusion: The prevalence of SBS discharges in focal epilepsy is relatively high (16%), emphasizing the importance of cautious interpretation of interictal EEG in epilepsy classification. Young age of disease onset is associated with higher rates of SBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Current status and challenges in lumbar proprioception measurement: a narrative review. Editorial: Novel insights into CAR T-cell associated neurotoxicity, volume II. Association of the hemoglobin glycation index with the large-artery atherosclerosis subtype in ischemic stroke: a dual-cohort study. Autonomic nervous system: an integrative regulator in circadian rhythm of blood pressure. Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury: a network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1