社交媒体上的儿科风湿病学:专家确保准确性,公众推动参与-比较分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology International Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00296-025-05809-3
Saverio La Bella, Marina Attanasi, Armando Di Ludovico, Francesca Mainieri, Federico Lauriola, Luisa Silvestrini, Francesca Ciarelli, Jacopo Osmelli, Virginia Girlando, Marta Rinaldi, Francesco Chiarelli, Seza Ozen, Marco Gattorno, Luciana Breda
{"title":"社交媒体上的儿科风湿病学:专家确保准确性,公众推动参与-比较分析。","authors":"Saverio La Bella, Marina Attanasi, Armando Di Ludovico, Francesca Mainieri, Federico Lauriola, Luisa Silvestrini, Francesca Ciarelli, Jacopo Osmelli, Virginia Girlando, Marta Rinaldi, Francesco Chiarelli, Seza Ozen, Marco Gattorno, Luciana Breda","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05809-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to investigate the quality and characteristics of content related to pediatric rheumatology on social media, comparing posts by health professionals (HPs) and non-HP (NHPs). Content creators, engagement metrics, sentiment, and misinformation were evaluated in the 150 most popular posts from 18 hashtags related to pediatric rheumatology on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. The Journal of American Medical Association Benchmark Scale (JAMA) and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) were used to assess quality, understandability and actionability in educational videos, respectively. Overall, 6723 posts were included (3130 photos, 3593 videos). The content accounted for 37.6 million interactions and 520.8 million views. NHPs represented the majority of creators (5160, 76.8%). Among educational posts (2074, 30.8%), HPs provided longer (59 [IQR 85] sec vs. 50 [IQR 77] sec; p < 0.001) more understandable (PEMAT-A/V 85.7 [IQR 18.9] vs. 75 [IQR 25]; p < 0.001), more actionable (PEMAT-A/V 66.7 [IQR 33.3] vs. 50 [IQR 41.7]; p < 0.001), and higher-quality (JAMA 3 [IQR 0] vs. 3 [IQR 1]; p < 0.001) videos than NHPs. In contrast, NHPs shared more commented educational photos (3 [IQR 11] vs. 1 [IQR 8]; p < 0.001) and videos (8 [IQR 50] vs. 4 [IQR 27]; p < 0.001) and more viewed videos (6181 [IQR 23417] vs. 2967.5 [IQR 20943]; p = 0.034) than HPs. Despite high interest in content related to pediatric rheumatology on social media, HPs are a minority of creators but provide better educational content than NHPs. There is a significant opportunity to provide high-quality educational content through these popular digital platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 3","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric rheumatology on social media: experts ensure accuracy, public drives engagement - a comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Saverio La Bella, Marina Attanasi, Armando Di Ludovico, Francesca Mainieri, Federico Lauriola, Luisa Silvestrini, Francesca Ciarelli, Jacopo Osmelli, Virginia Girlando, Marta Rinaldi, Francesco Chiarelli, Seza Ozen, Marco Gattorno, Luciana Breda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05809-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to investigate the quality and characteristics of content related to pediatric rheumatology on social media, comparing posts by health professionals (HPs) and non-HP (NHPs). Content creators, engagement metrics, sentiment, and misinformation were evaluated in the 150 most popular posts from 18 hashtags related to pediatric rheumatology on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. The Journal of American Medical Association Benchmark Scale (JAMA) and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) were used to assess quality, understandability and actionability in educational videos, respectively. Overall, 6723 posts were included (3130 photos, 3593 videos). The content accounted for 37.6 million interactions and 520.8 million views. NHPs represented the majority of creators (5160, 76.8%). Among educational posts (2074, 30.8%), HPs provided longer (59 [IQR 85] sec vs. 50 [IQR 77] sec; p < 0.001) more understandable (PEMAT-A/V 85.7 [IQR 18.9] vs. 75 [IQR 25]; p < 0.001), more actionable (PEMAT-A/V 66.7 [IQR 33.3] vs. 50 [IQR 41.7]; p < 0.001), and higher-quality (JAMA 3 [IQR 0] vs. 3 [IQR 1]; p < 0.001) videos than NHPs. In contrast, NHPs shared more commented educational photos (3 [IQR 11] vs. 1 [IQR 8]; p < 0.001) and videos (8 [IQR 50] vs. 4 [IQR 27]; p < 0.001) and more viewed videos (6181 [IQR 23417] vs. 2967.5 [IQR 20943]; p = 0.034) than HPs. Despite high interest in content related to pediatric rheumatology on social media, HPs are a minority of creators but provide better educational content than NHPs. There is a significant opportunity to provide high-quality educational content through these popular digital platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05809-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05809-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是调查社交媒体上与儿科风湿病相关内容的质量和特征,比较卫生专业人员(hp)和非卫生专业人员(NHPs)的帖子。在Facebook、Instagram和TikTok上,对18个与儿科风湿病相关的标签中的150个最受欢迎的帖子进行了内容创作者、参与度指标、情绪和错误信息的评估。分别采用美国医学会杂志基准量表(JAMA)和患者教育材料视听材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)来评估教育视频的质量、可理解性和可操作性。总共包含6723篇文章(3130张照片,3593个视频)。该内容有3760万次互动和5.208亿次观看。NHPs占大多数(5160,76.8%)。在教育岗位中(2074个,30.8%),hp提供的时间更长(59 [IQR 85]秒vs. 50 [IQR 77]秒;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pediatric rheumatology on social media: experts ensure accuracy, public drives engagement - a comparative analysis.

We aimed to investigate the quality and characteristics of content related to pediatric rheumatology on social media, comparing posts by health professionals (HPs) and non-HP (NHPs). Content creators, engagement metrics, sentiment, and misinformation were evaluated in the 150 most popular posts from 18 hashtags related to pediatric rheumatology on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. The Journal of American Medical Association Benchmark Scale (JAMA) and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) were used to assess quality, understandability and actionability in educational videos, respectively. Overall, 6723 posts were included (3130 photos, 3593 videos). The content accounted for 37.6 million interactions and 520.8 million views. NHPs represented the majority of creators (5160, 76.8%). Among educational posts (2074, 30.8%), HPs provided longer (59 [IQR 85] sec vs. 50 [IQR 77] sec; p < 0.001) more understandable (PEMAT-A/V 85.7 [IQR 18.9] vs. 75 [IQR 25]; p < 0.001), more actionable (PEMAT-A/V 66.7 [IQR 33.3] vs. 50 [IQR 41.7]; p < 0.001), and higher-quality (JAMA 3 [IQR 0] vs. 3 [IQR 1]; p < 0.001) videos than NHPs. In contrast, NHPs shared more commented educational photos (3 [IQR 11] vs. 1 [IQR 8]; p < 0.001) and videos (8 [IQR 50] vs. 4 [IQR 27]; p < 0.001) and more viewed videos (6181 [IQR 23417] vs. 2967.5 [IQR 20943]; p = 0.034) than HPs. Despite high interest in content related to pediatric rheumatology on social media, HPs are a minority of creators but provide better educational content than NHPs. There is a significant opportunity to provide high-quality educational content through these popular digital platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
期刊最新文献
PARP1 as a novel therapeutic and diagnostic tool in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review. The interconnection between obstructive sleep apnoea and spondyloarthritis: pathophysiology, clinical evidence, and future perspectives. Underrecognized depressive and anxiety symptoms in inflammatory arthritis: implications for systematic screening using PHQ-9 and GAD-7. Enhancing spinal mobility and functional capacity through aerobic exercise and yoga in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical and laboratory predictors of diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in rheumatology: a retrospective tertiary-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1