清晰语音的空气动力学、声门学和声学效应:一项探索性研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.011
Mahdi Tahamtan, Ronald C Scherer
{"title":"清晰语音的空气动力学、声门学和声学效应:一项探索性研究。","authors":"Mahdi Tahamtan, Ronald C Scherer","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the current study was to examine the acoustic, aerodynamic, and glottographic effects of Clear reading compared with Habitual reading.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were five female and four male college students. They were native speakers of American English and had normal voice, speech, and hearing. Participants were instructed to read six sentences in four different conditions: (1) Habitual reading with a Glottal Enterprises mask off the face, (2) Habitual reading with the mask on the face, (3) Clear reading mask-off, and (4) Clear reading mask-on. Praat was used for acoustic analysis. The Glottal Enterprises system was used for airflow and oral air pressure recordings. A Kay Laryngograph was used to acquire the electroglottographic (EGG) signal. The airflow, air pressure, and EGG signals were analyzed using BGSigplot, implemented in MATLAB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following measures increased significantly in clear reading compared with Habitual reading: (1) duration of sentences, stressed vowels, unvoiced fricatives, voice onset time for stop consonants, and stop gap in the second /p/ in the words papa, piper, and pepper; (2) fundamental frequency for vowels /ʊ/ and /ɛ/ for females; (3) intensity of stressed vowels and release of stop consonants; (4) oral air pressure in the phoneme /p/; and (5) airflow measures (average airflow, total air volume, and peak flow) in the words pass, cushion, papa, put, and pepper. The following measures did not change significantly in clear reading compared with Habitual reading: (1) fundamental frequency in male subjects; (2) glottal airflow measures, including closed quotient, open quotient (OQ), and skewing quotient; and (3) EGG measures, including EGG width, height, and contact and OQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences observed between Habitual and Clear readings suggest that clear speech predominantly involves changes in subglottal pressure and oral cavity kinematics rather than modifications in vocal fold adduction and vibratory dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aerodynamic, Glottographic, and Acoustic Effects of Clear Speech: An Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mahdi Tahamtan, Ronald C Scherer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the current study was to examine the acoustic, aerodynamic, and glottographic effects of Clear reading compared with Habitual reading.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were five female and four male college students. They were native speakers of American English and had normal voice, speech, and hearing. Participants were instructed to read six sentences in four different conditions: (1) Habitual reading with a Glottal Enterprises mask off the face, (2) Habitual reading with the mask on the face, (3) Clear reading mask-off, and (4) Clear reading mask-on. Praat was used for acoustic analysis. The Glottal Enterprises system was used for airflow and oral air pressure recordings. A Kay Laryngograph was used to acquire the electroglottographic (EGG) signal. The airflow, air pressure, and EGG signals were analyzed using BGSigplot, implemented in MATLAB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following measures increased significantly in clear reading compared with Habitual reading: (1) duration of sentences, stressed vowels, unvoiced fricatives, voice onset time for stop consonants, and stop gap in the second /p/ in the words papa, piper, and pepper; (2) fundamental frequency for vowels /ʊ/ and /ɛ/ for females; (3) intensity of stressed vowels and release of stop consonants; (4) oral air pressure in the phoneme /p/; and (5) airflow measures (average airflow, total air volume, and peak flow) in the words pass, cushion, papa, put, and pepper. The following measures did not change significantly in clear reading compared with Habitual reading: (1) fundamental frequency in male subjects; (2) glottal airflow measures, including closed quotient, open quotient (OQ), and skewing quotient; and (3) EGG measures, including EGG width, height, and contact and OQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences observed between Habitual and Clear readings suggest that clear speech predominantly involves changes in subglottal pressure and oral cavity kinematics rather than modifications in vocal fold adduction and vibratory dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较清晰阅读和习惯阅读对声学、空气动力学和声门学的影响。方法:以大学生为研究对象,女5名,男4名。他们的母语是美式英语,声音、语言和听力正常。参与者被要求在四种不同的条件下阅读六个句子:(1)戴上声门企业面具习惯性阅读,(2)戴上面具习惯性阅读,(3)摘下面具阅读,(4)戴上面具阅读。使用Praat进行声学分析。声门企业系统用于气流和口腔气压记录。使用凯喉仪获取声门电图信号。利用MATLAB实现的BGSigplot对气流、气压和EGG信号进行分析。结果:与习惯阅读相比,清晰阅读在以下方面有显著提高:(1)句子时长、重读元音、不发音摩擦音、停止辅音的发音时间、papa、piper和pepper中第二个/p/的停顿间隙;(2)女性元音/ / /和/ / /的基本频率;(3)重读元音的强度和停止辅音的释放;(4)口腔气压在音素/p/;(5)气流测量(平均气流、总风量、峰值流量),分别用pass、cushion、papa、put、pepper表示。与习惯阅读相比,清晰阅读的以下指标没有显著变化:(1)男性受试者的基本频率;(2)声门气流测量,包括闭商、开商、偏商;(3) EGG测量,包括EGG宽度、高度、接触量和OQ。结论:习惯性和清晰读音之间的差异表明,清晰语音主要涉及声门下压力和口腔运动学的改变,而不是声带内收和振动动力学的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aerodynamic, Glottographic, and Acoustic Effects of Clear Speech: An Exploratory Study.

Objectives: The objective of the current study was to examine the acoustic, aerodynamic, and glottographic effects of Clear reading compared with Habitual reading.

Methods: Participants were five female and four male college students. They were native speakers of American English and had normal voice, speech, and hearing. Participants were instructed to read six sentences in four different conditions: (1) Habitual reading with a Glottal Enterprises mask off the face, (2) Habitual reading with the mask on the face, (3) Clear reading mask-off, and (4) Clear reading mask-on. Praat was used for acoustic analysis. The Glottal Enterprises system was used for airflow and oral air pressure recordings. A Kay Laryngograph was used to acquire the electroglottographic (EGG) signal. The airflow, air pressure, and EGG signals were analyzed using BGSigplot, implemented in MATLAB.

Results: The following measures increased significantly in clear reading compared with Habitual reading: (1) duration of sentences, stressed vowels, unvoiced fricatives, voice onset time for stop consonants, and stop gap in the second /p/ in the words papa, piper, and pepper; (2) fundamental frequency for vowels /ʊ/ and /ɛ/ for females; (3) intensity of stressed vowels and release of stop consonants; (4) oral air pressure in the phoneme /p/; and (5) airflow measures (average airflow, total air volume, and peak flow) in the words pass, cushion, papa, put, and pepper. The following measures did not change significantly in clear reading compared with Habitual reading: (1) fundamental frequency in male subjects; (2) glottal airflow measures, including closed quotient, open quotient (OQ), and skewing quotient; and (3) EGG measures, including EGG width, height, and contact and OQ.

Conclusions: Differences observed between Habitual and Clear readings suggest that clear speech predominantly involves changes in subglottal pressure and oral cavity kinematics rather than modifications in vocal fold adduction and vibratory dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic Assumptions (AA): A Retrospective Study of an Approach to Optimizing Personal Resonance Goals in Gender-Affirming Voice Training. Long-Term Average Spectrum as an Outcome Measure of Vocal Projection After Resonant Voice Therapy in Carnatic Classical Singers What is the Effect of CPAP Treatment With Humidifier on Vocal Quality? Vocal Demands of Musical Theatre Rehearsals: A Dosimetry Study Perception of Vibrato by Professional Voice Teachers: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1