394例无菌无纺布手术敷料的临床应用体会。

Claas Roes, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge, Michael Praeder, Thomas Eberlein, Martin Abel
{"title":"394例无菌无纺布手术敷料的临床应用体会。","authors":"Claas Roes, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge, Michael Praeder, Thomas Eberlein, Martin Abel","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical wounds and periwound skin require protection to prevent complications, which affect clinical outcomes and patient quality of life. This study surveyed 45 health professionals treating 394 patients to elicit their experiences of the performance, quality, ease of application and usability of the sterile surgical wound dressing Curapor under routine conditions. Most (90%) wounds were acute, including postoperative wounds, lacerations, cuts and abrasions. The average wear time per dressing was 2.08 days; 94% of patients experienced no dressing slippage and 98% experienced no tape blisters. Curapor was rated good at absorbing exudate. All health professionals reported that their patients thought the dressing was soft or very soft and 98% said that patients found its comfort to be good or very good. The results of the study suggest that Curapor meets the performance requirements for a post-surgical dressing.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 4","pages":"S24-S31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' experiences of using a sterile non-woven surgical dressing on 394 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Claas Roes, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge, Michael Praeder, Thomas Eberlein, Martin Abel\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2024.0186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgical wounds and periwound skin require protection to prevent complications, which affect clinical outcomes and patient quality of life. This study surveyed 45 health professionals treating 394 patients to elicit their experiences of the performance, quality, ease of application and usability of the sterile surgical wound dressing Curapor under routine conditions. Most (90%) wounds were acute, including postoperative wounds, lacerations, cuts and abrasions. The average wear time per dressing was 2.08 days; 94% of patients experienced no dressing slippage and 98% experienced no tape blisters. Curapor was rated good at absorbing exudate. All health professionals reported that their patients thought the dressing was soft or very soft and 98% said that patients found its comfort to be good or very good. The results of the study suggest that Curapor meets the performance requirements for a post-surgical dressing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"S24-S31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术伤口和伤口周围的皮肤需要保护,以防止并发症,影响临床结果和患者的生活质量。本研究调查了45名医疗专业人员治疗394例患者,以了解他们在常规条件下对无菌外科创面敷料Curapor的性能、质量、使用方便性和可用性的体验。大多数(90%)伤口为急性,包括术后伤口、撕裂、割伤和擦伤。每次包扎的平均磨损时间为2.08 d;94%的患者没有出现敷料滑落,98%的患者没有出现胶带起泡。对渗出液的吸收效果较好。所有的卫生专业人员都报告说,他们的病人认为敷料很软或很软,98%的人说病人觉得它的舒适度很好或很好。研究结果表明,Curapor符合术后敷料的性能要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinicians' experiences of using a sterile non-woven surgical dressing on 394 patients.

Surgical wounds and periwound skin require protection to prevent complications, which affect clinical outcomes and patient quality of life. This study surveyed 45 health professionals treating 394 patients to elicit their experiences of the performance, quality, ease of application and usability of the sterile surgical wound dressing Curapor under routine conditions. Most (90%) wounds were acute, including postoperative wounds, lacerations, cuts and abrasions. The average wear time per dressing was 2.08 days; 94% of patients experienced no dressing slippage and 98% experienced no tape blisters. Curapor was rated good at absorbing exudate. All health professionals reported that their patients thought the dressing was soft or very soft and 98% said that patients found its comfort to be good or very good. The results of the study suggest that Curapor meets the performance requirements for a post-surgical dressing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 'stop-and-go' process. Advanced practitioners are not the problem: a system under strain leads to workforce gaps and mismatched deployment. Lymphoedema measurement methods in cancer survivors: accuracy, health economics and practice implications. Perceptions and experiences of patients and clinicians of anal cancer screening: a hermeneutic phenomenological study. Hydration risk assessment and fluid balance monitoring in older patients at a community hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1