ITER中断缓解系统用纯气态氦冷却低温球团生产的可行性研究

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Fusion Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114891
T. Boujet, A. Attard, P. Bonnay, N. Luchier, J. Manzagol, F. Millet
{"title":"ITER中断缓解系统用纯气态氦冷却低温球团生产的可行性研究","authors":"T. Boujet,&nbsp;A. Attard,&nbsp;P. Bonnay,&nbsp;N. Luchier,&nbsp;J. Manzagol,&nbsp;F. Millet","doi":"10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>CEA/DSBT designed and operated a test bench for pellet injection cooled by liquid helium (LHe) to study the production and the acceleration of large cryogenic pellets for the ITER Disruption Mitigation System (DMS). Large (ø28.5 mm) protium (<sup>1</sup>H) pellets of ∼3 g were successfully formed in 20 mins and then accelerated above 500 m/s. However, LHe cooling is not distributed by ITER cryoplant and shall be replaced by supercritical helium (SHe) cooling.</div><div>To evaluate the feasibility of using SHe as a coolant, the CEA/DSBT test bench is modified to operate with pure gaseous helium cooling (GHe at 1.25 bara), which behave more like SHe than LHe used up to now. The main difference between GHe and LHe cooling is the temperature variation induced by the thermal heat removal. In LHe cooling, the heat exchange occurs mainly at a constant temperature due to the liquid to gas phase change (latent heat). In the opposite, in GHe cooling, only the specific heat is available for heat removal, resulting in a cooling temperature increase. Excessive temperature rise is a drawback to the goal of reduced pellet formation times, where the cell temperature must be kept as low as possible.</div><div>This paper presents a comparison of LHe and GHe cooling using the current ∅28.5 mm <em>in-situ</em> condensation cell and highlights some pellet formation key parameters such as the species (pure protium and pure neon or protium/neon mix) and the cold cell temperature. The protium pellets were the most extensively compared, as they are the fastest to produce and the most characterised with LHe cooling. All other types of DMS pellets were also briefly studied. The GHe cooling results show similar pellet formation durations, pellet aspects and speeds as those with LHe cooling. This proof of principle using gaseous cooling is a significant step in the design study of the ITER-DMS cold cell using SHe cooling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55133,"journal":{"name":"Fusion Engineering and Design","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 114891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility study for cryogenic pellets production with pure gaseous helium cooling for ITER Disruption Mitigation System\",\"authors\":\"T. Boujet,&nbsp;A. Attard,&nbsp;P. Bonnay,&nbsp;N. Luchier,&nbsp;J. Manzagol,&nbsp;F. Millet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>CEA/DSBT designed and operated a test bench for pellet injection cooled by liquid helium (LHe) to study the production and the acceleration of large cryogenic pellets for the ITER Disruption Mitigation System (DMS). Large (ø28.5 mm) protium (<sup>1</sup>H) pellets of ∼3 g were successfully formed in 20 mins and then accelerated above 500 m/s. However, LHe cooling is not distributed by ITER cryoplant and shall be replaced by supercritical helium (SHe) cooling.</div><div>To evaluate the feasibility of using SHe as a coolant, the CEA/DSBT test bench is modified to operate with pure gaseous helium cooling (GHe at 1.25 bara), which behave more like SHe than LHe used up to now. The main difference between GHe and LHe cooling is the temperature variation induced by the thermal heat removal. In LHe cooling, the heat exchange occurs mainly at a constant temperature due to the liquid to gas phase change (latent heat). In the opposite, in GHe cooling, only the specific heat is available for heat removal, resulting in a cooling temperature increase. Excessive temperature rise is a drawback to the goal of reduced pellet formation times, where the cell temperature must be kept as low as possible.</div><div>This paper presents a comparison of LHe and GHe cooling using the current ∅28.5 mm <em>in-situ</em> condensation cell and highlights some pellet formation key parameters such as the species (pure protium and pure neon or protium/neon mix) and the cold cell temperature. The protium pellets were the most extensively compared, as they are the fastest to produce and the most characterised with LHe cooling. All other types of DMS pellets were also briefly studied. The GHe cooling results show similar pellet formation durations, pellet aspects and speeds as those with LHe cooling. This proof of principle using gaseous cooling is a significant step in the design study of the ITER-DMS cold cell using SHe cooling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fusion Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fusion Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379625000936\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fusion Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379625000936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CEA/DSBT设计并运行了液氦冷却球团喷射试验台,以研究ITER中断缓解系统(DMS)大低温球团的生产和加速。20分钟内成功形成约3 g的大(ø28.5 mm) protium (1H)微球,然后加速到500 m/s以上。然而,LHe冷却不是由ITER低温装置分配的,而是由超临界氦(SHe)冷却代替。为了评估使用SHe作为冷却剂的可行性,对CEA/DSBT试验台进行了改进,使其使用纯气态氦冷却(GHe为1.25 bara),其性能更像SHe,而不是目前使用的LHe。GHe和LHe冷却的主要区别在于热排热引起的温度变化。在LHe冷却中,由于液气相变化(潜热),热交换主要发生在恒温下。相反,在GHe冷却中,只有比热可用于散热,导致冷却温度升高。过度的温度上升是减少球团形成时间的一个缺点,其中电池温度必须保持尽可能低。本文采用现行的∅28.5 mm原位冷凝池对LHe和GHe冷却进行了比较,并重点介绍了一些颗粒形成的关键参数,如物质(纯protium和纯neon或protium/neon混合物)和冷池温度。protium丸被广泛的比较,因为它们是最快的生产和最具特征的LHe冷却。对所有其他类型的DMS微丸也进行了简要的研究。GHe冷却的结果显示出与LHe冷却相似的球团形成时间、球团方面和速度。这种使用气体冷却的原理证明是使用SHe冷却的ITER-DMS冷电池设计研究的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility study for cryogenic pellets production with pure gaseous helium cooling for ITER Disruption Mitigation System
CEA/DSBT designed and operated a test bench for pellet injection cooled by liquid helium (LHe) to study the production and the acceleration of large cryogenic pellets for the ITER Disruption Mitigation System (DMS). Large (ø28.5 mm) protium (1H) pellets of ∼3 g were successfully formed in 20 mins and then accelerated above 500 m/s. However, LHe cooling is not distributed by ITER cryoplant and shall be replaced by supercritical helium (SHe) cooling.
To evaluate the feasibility of using SHe as a coolant, the CEA/DSBT test bench is modified to operate with pure gaseous helium cooling (GHe at 1.25 bara), which behave more like SHe than LHe used up to now. The main difference between GHe and LHe cooling is the temperature variation induced by the thermal heat removal. In LHe cooling, the heat exchange occurs mainly at a constant temperature due to the liquid to gas phase change (latent heat). In the opposite, in GHe cooling, only the specific heat is available for heat removal, resulting in a cooling temperature increase. Excessive temperature rise is a drawback to the goal of reduced pellet formation times, where the cell temperature must be kept as low as possible.
This paper presents a comparison of LHe and GHe cooling using the current ∅28.5 mm in-situ condensation cell and highlights some pellet formation key parameters such as the species (pure protium and pure neon or protium/neon mix) and the cold cell temperature. The protium pellets were the most extensively compared, as they are the fastest to produce and the most characterised with LHe cooling. All other types of DMS pellets were also briefly studied. The GHe cooling results show similar pellet formation durations, pellet aspects and speeds as those with LHe cooling. This proof of principle using gaseous cooling is a significant step in the design study of the ITER-DMS cold cell using SHe cooling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fusion Engineering and Design
Fusion Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
23.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers about experiments (both plasma and technology), theory, models, methods, and designs in areas relating to technology, engineering, and applied science aspects of magnetic and inertial fusion energy. Specific areas of interest include: MFE and IFE design studies for experiments and reactors; fusion nuclear technologies and materials, including blankets and shields; analysis of reactor plasmas; plasma heating, fuelling, and vacuum systems; drivers, targets, and special technologies for IFE, controls and diagnostics; fuel cycle analysis and tritium reprocessing and handling; operations and remote maintenance of reactors; safety, decommissioning, and waste management; economic and environmental analysis of components and systems.
期刊最新文献
Study of 4H-SiC detectors as a potential fast neutron diagnostic for fusion experiment Energy-based method for determining tensile properties of structural materials in fusion reactors using small-sized three-point bending specimens Thermal behaviour of ZrCo getter beds during hydrogen absorption at variable flow rates and concentrations Code-to-code comparison of SOLPS-ITER and SONIC edge transport codes in JT-60SA tokamak plasma conditions Theoretical background for a fast flow liquid metal divertor experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1