Taylor Furst, Muhammad I. Jalal, Prasanth Romiyo, Suyash Sau, Jonathan Stone, Tyler Schmidt
{"title":"老年髓内室管膜瘤患者手术次数较少,生存预后较差:监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析","authors":"Taylor Furst, Muhammad I. Jalal, Prasanth Romiyo, Suyash Sau, Jonathan Stone, Tyler Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Intramedullary ependymomas account for ∼50 % of all primary tumors in the spinal cord. Though gross total resection has become mainstay, other predictors of survival remain poorly characterized. The present study aims to perform a survival analysis and compare prognostic factors across pediatric, adult and geriatric cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was employed to isolate cases of intramedullary ependymomas from 2000 to 2021. Cases were grouped based on age: 0–19 years=pediatric, 20–64 years=adult, 65 + years=geriatric. Kaplan Meier followed by multivariate cox regression analyses were used to identify survival trends. Univariate comparison analyses compared age cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2045 cases were included. Geriatric patients demonstrate increased risk of mortality (pediatric vs geriatric: HR=0.23, CI [0.13–0.39], p < 0.001; adult vs geriatric: HR=0.18, CI [0.15–0.23], p < 0.001). Compared to adult patients (92.7 %), geriatric patients (85.2 %) underwent significantly less surgery (p < 0.001). Sex did not influence pediatric or geriatric survival nor did surgery statistically impact pediatric survival, but otherwise surgery not performed, male patients and grade III tumors significantly worsened overall and age-specific survival. Surgery performed in a pediatric patient led to a longer mean survival of 19.8 months, which is clinically relevant despite not meeting statistical significance. Year of diagnosis did not impact overall (p = 0.79) nor age-specific survival (pediatric: p = 0.98, adult: p = 0.91, geriatric: p = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Geriatric patients suffer from worse survival than those of younger age. Surgery decreases mortality, yet less geriatric patients are receiving surgical resection. No significant survival gains have been made over the last two decades among any age. Further study is needed to optimize medical management to compliment surgical resection and surgery should be considered more often in geriatric patients to improve survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 108807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geriatric patients undergo surgery less and have worse survival outcomes with intramedullary ependymoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Furst, Muhammad I. Jalal, Prasanth Romiyo, Suyash Sau, Jonathan Stone, Tyler Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Intramedullary ependymomas account for ∼50 % of all primary tumors in the spinal cord. Though gross total resection has become mainstay, other predictors of survival remain poorly characterized. The present study aims to perform a survival analysis and compare prognostic factors across pediatric, adult and geriatric cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was employed to isolate cases of intramedullary ependymomas from 2000 to 2021. Cases were grouped based on age: 0–19 years=pediatric, 20–64 years=adult, 65 + years=geriatric. Kaplan Meier followed by multivariate cox regression analyses were used to identify survival trends. Univariate comparison analyses compared age cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2045 cases were included. Geriatric patients demonstrate increased risk of mortality (pediatric vs geriatric: HR=0.23, CI [0.13–0.39], p < 0.001; adult vs geriatric: HR=0.18, CI [0.15–0.23], p < 0.001). Compared to adult patients (92.7 %), geriatric patients (85.2 %) underwent significantly less surgery (p < 0.001). Sex did not influence pediatric or geriatric survival nor did surgery statistically impact pediatric survival, but otherwise surgery not performed, male patients and grade III tumors significantly worsened overall and age-specific survival. Surgery performed in a pediatric patient led to a longer mean survival of 19.8 months, which is clinically relevant despite not meeting statistical significance. Year of diagnosis did not impact overall (p = 0.79) nor age-specific survival (pediatric: p = 0.98, adult: p = 0.91, geriatric: p = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Geriatric patients suffer from worse survival than those of younger age. Surgery decreases mortality, yet less geriatric patients are receiving surgical resection. No significant survival gains have been made over the last two decades among any age. Further study is needed to optimize medical management to compliment surgical resection and surgery should be considered more often in geriatric patients to improve survival.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"250 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725000903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725000903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:髓内室管膜瘤约占脊髓原发性肿瘤的50% %。虽然总切除已成为主流,但其他预测生存率的指标仍不明确。本研究旨在对儿童、成人和老年人群进行生存分析并比较预后因素。方法采用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库,分离2000 - 2021年的髓内室管膜瘤病例。病例按年龄分组:0-19岁=儿童,20-64岁=成人,65岁 + 岁=老年。Kaplan Meier随后采用多变量cox回归分析来确定生存趋势。单变量比较分析比较了年龄队列。结果共纳入病例2045例。老年患者死亡风险增加(儿科vs老年:HR=0.23, CI [0.13-0.39], p <; 0.001;成人vs老年人:HR=0.18, CI [0.15-0.23], p <; 0.001)。与成人患者(92.7 %)相比,老年患者(85.2% %)的手术次数明显减少(p <; 0.001)。性别对儿童或老年患者的生存没有影响,手术对儿童的生存也没有统计学影响,但未进行手术的男性患者和III级肿瘤显著恶化了总体生存和年龄特异性生存。一名儿童患者接受手术后平均生存期延长,为19.8个月,尽管没有达到统计学意义,但具有临床相关性。诊断年份不影响总体生存率(p = 0.79),也不影响年龄特异性生存率(儿童:p = 0.98,成人:p = 0.91,老年人:p = 0.11)。结论老年患者的生存期较低龄患者差。手术降低了死亡率,但接受手术切除的老年患者较少。在过去的二十年中,任何年龄段的生存率都没有显著的提高。需要进一步的研究来优化医疗管理以配合手术切除,并应更多地考虑在老年患者中进行手术以提高生存率。
Geriatric patients undergo surgery less and have worse survival outcomes with intramedullary ependymoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis
Objective
Intramedullary ependymomas account for ∼50 % of all primary tumors in the spinal cord. Though gross total resection has become mainstay, other predictors of survival remain poorly characterized. The present study aims to perform a survival analysis and compare prognostic factors across pediatric, adult and geriatric cohorts.
Methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was employed to isolate cases of intramedullary ependymomas from 2000 to 2021. Cases were grouped based on age: 0–19 years=pediatric, 20–64 years=adult, 65 + years=geriatric. Kaplan Meier followed by multivariate cox regression analyses were used to identify survival trends. Univariate comparison analyses compared age cohorts.
Results
2045 cases were included. Geriatric patients demonstrate increased risk of mortality (pediatric vs geriatric: HR=0.23, CI [0.13–0.39], p < 0.001; adult vs geriatric: HR=0.18, CI [0.15–0.23], p < 0.001). Compared to adult patients (92.7 %), geriatric patients (85.2 %) underwent significantly less surgery (p < 0.001). Sex did not influence pediatric or geriatric survival nor did surgery statistically impact pediatric survival, but otherwise surgery not performed, male patients and grade III tumors significantly worsened overall and age-specific survival. Surgery performed in a pediatric patient led to a longer mean survival of 19.8 months, which is clinically relevant despite not meeting statistical significance. Year of diagnosis did not impact overall (p = 0.79) nor age-specific survival (pediatric: p = 0.98, adult: p = 0.91, geriatric: p = 0.11).
Conclusions
Geriatric patients suffer from worse survival than those of younger age. Surgery decreases mortality, yet less geriatric patients are receiving surgical resection. No significant survival gains have been made over the last two decades among any age. Further study is needed to optimize medical management to compliment surgical resection and surgery should be considered more often in geriatric patients to improve survival.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.