Floor J Backes, Tirza Areli Calderón Boyle, Jonathan Lim, John Hartman, Jeanne M Schilder, Jean A Hurteau, Jessica Perhanidis, Amanda Golembesky, Ritu Salani
{"title":"美国上皮性卵巢癌患者一线维持性尼拉帕尼单药治疗的实际持续时间:CHAR1ZMA研究","authors":"Floor J Backes, Tirza Areli Calderón Boyle, Jonathan Lim, John Hartman, Jeanne M Schilder, Jean A Hurteau, Jessica Perhanidis, Amanda Golembesky, Ritu Salani","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The CHAR1ZMA study described real-world duration of first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used a US nationwide, electronic-health-record-derived, de-identified database. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with epithelial ovarian cancer who initiated first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy (January 2017-December 2022 [inclusive]) following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib monotherapy duration was measured as the time to treatment discontinuation, estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, overall and stratified by treatment duration (early discontinuers [≤90 days]; non-early discontinuers [>90 days or did not discontinue]). Analyses were repeated in a sub-group of patients with homologous recombination-deficient tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Toxicity was the most common reason for niraparib discontinuation among early discontinuers (67.7%) and was less frequent among non-early discontinuers (18.1%). Dose modifications were less frequent among early discontinuers (29.8%) than non-early discontinuers (53.6%). Disease progression was the most common reason for niraparib discontinuation among non-early discontinuers (74.8%) and was less frequent among early discontinuers (30.4%). The observed median treatment duration was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.0 to 8.1) overall (N = 560) and was 4.5 months longer among non-early discontinuers (11.7 months [95% CI 9.8 to 14.7]; n = 399). In the homologous recombination-deficient sub-group (n = 144), the observed median treatment duration was 11.6 months (95% CI 7.8. to 16.1) and was 5.1 months longer among non-early discontinuers (16.7 months [95% CI 12.0 to 22.8]; n = 114).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world study of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy, drug toxicity was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation in early discontinuers. Effective and early clinical management of drug toxicity may help mitigate these adverse events, allowing patients to remain on niraparib maintenance treatment longer and experience the potential full therapeutic benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"100044"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world duration of first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in the United States: the CHAR1ZMA study.\",\"authors\":\"Floor J Backes, Tirza Areli Calderón Boyle, Jonathan Lim, John Hartman, Jeanne M Schilder, Jean A Hurteau, Jessica Perhanidis, Amanda Golembesky, Ritu Salani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The CHAR1ZMA study described real-world duration of first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used a US nationwide, electronic-health-record-derived, de-identified database. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with epithelial ovarian cancer who initiated first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy (January 2017-December 2022 [inclusive]) following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib monotherapy duration was measured as the time to treatment discontinuation, estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, overall and stratified by treatment duration (early discontinuers [≤90 days]; non-early discontinuers [>90 days or did not discontinue]). Analyses were repeated in a sub-group of patients with homologous recombination-deficient tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Toxicity was the most common reason for niraparib discontinuation among early discontinuers (67.7%) and was less frequent among non-early discontinuers (18.1%). Dose modifications were less frequent among early discontinuers (29.8%) than non-early discontinuers (53.6%). Disease progression was the most common reason for niraparib discontinuation among non-early discontinuers (74.8%) and was less frequent among early discontinuers (30.4%). The observed median treatment duration was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.0 to 8.1) overall (N = 560) and was 4.5 months longer among non-early discontinuers (11.7 months [95% CI 9.8 to 14.7]; n = 399). In the homologous recombination-deficient sub-group (n = 144), the observed median treatment duration was 11.6 months (95% CI 7.8. to 16.1) and was 5.1 months longer among non-early discontinuers (16.7 months [95% CI 12.0 to 22.8]; n = 114).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world study of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy, drug toxicity was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation in early discontinuers. Effective and early clinical management of drug toxicity may help mitigate these adverse events, allowing patients to remain on niraparib maintenance treatment longer and experience the potential full therapeutic benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"100044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:CHAR1ZMA研究描述了上皮性卵巢癌患者一线维持尼拉帕尼单药治疗的真实持续时间。方法:这项回顾性研究使用了美国全国范围内的电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,患有上皮性卵巢癌,在一线铂基化疗后开始一线维持尼拉帕尼单药治疗(2017年1月- 2022年12月[含])。尼拉帕尼单药治疗持续时间测量为治疗停止的时间,使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计,总体和按治疗持续时间分层(早期停药[≤90天];非早期停药者[bbb90天或未停药])。在同源重组缺陷肿瘤患者亚组中重复分析。结果:毒性是早期停药者中最常见的尼拉帕尼停药原因(67.7%),而在非早期停药者中较少见(18.1%)。早期停药者(29.8%)的剂量调整频率低于非早期停药者(53.6%)。在非早期停药者中,疾病进展是尼拉帕尼停药最常见的原因(74.8%),在早期停药者中较少见(30.4%)。观察到的中位治疗持续时间总体为7.2个月(95% CI 6.0至8.1)(N = 560),非早期停药者延长4.5个月(11.7个月[95% CI 9.8至14.7];N = 399)。在同源重组缺陷亚组(n = 144)中,观察到的中位治疗时间为11.6个月(95% CI为7.8)。非早期停药者延长5.1个月(16.7个月[95% CI 12.0至22.8];N = 114)。结论:在这项现实世界的研究中,上皮性卵巢癌患者接受一线维护性尼拉帕尼单药治疗,药物毒性是早期停药者停药的最常见原因。有效和早期的药物毒性临床管理可能有助于减轻这些不良事件,使患者继续接受尼拉帕尼维持治疗更长时间,并体验潜在的全面治疗益处。
Real-world duration of first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in the United States: the CHAR1ZMA study.
Objective: The CHAR1ZMA study described real-world duration of first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Methods: This retrospective study used a US nationwide, electronic-health-record-derived, de-identified database. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with epithelial ovarian cancer who initiated first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy (January 2017-December 2022 [inclusive]) following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib monotherapy duration was measured as the time to treatment discontinuation, estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, overall and stratified by treatment duration (early discontinuers [≤90 days]; non-early discontinuers [>90 days or did not discontinue]). Analyses were repeated in a sub-group of patients with homologous recombination-deficient tumors.
Results: Toxicity was the most common reason for niraparib discontinuation among early discontinuers (67.7%) and was less frequent among non-early discontinuers (18.1%). Dose modifications were less frequent among early discontinuers (29.8%) than non-early discontinuers (53.6%). Disease progression was the most common reason for niraparib discontinuation among non-early discontinuers (74.8%) and was less frequent among early discontinuers (30.4%). The observed median treatment duration was 7.2 months (95% CI 6.0 to 8.1) overall (N = 560) and was 4.5 months longer among non-early discontinuers (11.7 months [95% CI 9.8 to 14.7]; n = 399). In the homologous recombination-deficient sub-group (n = 144), the observed median treatment duration was 11.6 months (95% CI 7.8. to 16.1) and was 5.1 months longer among non-early discontinuers (16.7 months [95% CI 12.0 to 22.8]; n = 114).
Conclusion: In this real-world study of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving first-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy, drug toxicity was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation in early discontinuers. Effective and early clinical management of drug toxicity may help mitigate these adverse events, allowing patients to remain on niraparib maintenance treatment longer and experience the potential full therapeutic benefit.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.