Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li
{"title":"商用扫描仪辅助次谐波压力估计的实验研究。","authors":"Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li","doi":"10.1121/10.0035574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended \"optimal\" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 2","pages":"1322-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experimental study on subharmonic-aided pressure estimation with commercial scanners.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0035574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended \\\"optimal\\\" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"157 2\",\"pages\":\"1322-1335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究利用从校准程序中获得的数据评估超声造影剂的次谐波辅助压力估计(SHAPE)的性能。在受控微泡稳定性和流速条件下,使用商用超声扫描仪(GE Healthcare Logiq E20,中国无锡)对流动造影剂(Sonazoid)在幻影装置中进行SHAPE。在SHAPE校准过程中收集次谐波时间强度曲线进行分析。稀释造影剂的次谐波振幅表现出随时间的下降,但不受速度的影响。SHAPE灵敏度是通过反向加压和减压序列来测量的,以减轻次谐波随时间下降的影响。与传统上推荐的最大斜率处的“最佳”力学指数(MI)水平相比,校准曲线稳定生长阶段的大范围力学指数(MI)水平显示出更高的SHAPE灵敏度。SHAPE的最大近似灵敏度为-0.04 dB/mm Hg。在MI水平范围内,次谐波振幅与压力呈线性相关(R2 > 0.9, p
An experimental study on subharmonic-aided pressure estimation with commercial scanners.
This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended "optimal" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.