右美托咪定对A型主动脉夹层术后谵妄的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1219
Yan-Rong Yu, Yi-Lin Wang, Xue-Wen Zhu, Li Li, Dong-Jin Wang, Ya-Peng Wang, Jia-Xin Ye
{"title":"右美托咪定对A型主动脉夹层术后谵妄的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Yan-Rong Yu, Yi-Lin Wang, Xue-Wen Zhu, Li Li, Dong-Jin Wang, Ya-Peng Wang, Jia-Xin Ye","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common neurocognitive complication after type A aortic dissection (TAAD), which seriously affects the recovery of patients, and the current intervention timing and treatment methods are still uncertain. This prospective observational cohort study aimed to discuss the effect of dexmedetomidine on POD in patients undergoing TAAD surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2022 and March 2023, 167 eligible patients aged 18 to 85 years who underwent TAAD surgery participated in this study. The patients were assigned to either the dexmedetomidine or the control group, which did not receive dexmedetomidine treatment. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of delirium within five days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included intubation duration, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), total postoperative hospital stay, incidence of non-delirium complications, and all-cause mortality within seven days. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, the dexmedetomidine group was made up of 120 patients, whereas the control group comprised 47. The occurrence rate of POD increased from 35.0% in the dexmedetomidine group to 42.6% in the control group, but there was no significant difference [odds ratio (OR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-1.45; P=0.36]. After 1:1 PSM, there were 42 patients in each of the dexmedetomidine and control groups. The occurrence of POD was 28.6% and 45.2% in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (OR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.20-1.20; P=0.12). The dexmedetomidine group showed a shorter ICU hospitalization time and postoperative hospital stay than the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the two groups had no statistical differences in other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative dexmedetomidine did not decrease the occurrence rate of POD in TAAD patients. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the dexmedetomidine and control groups regarding the occurrence of non-delirium complications, intubation time, ICU hospitalization time, and postoperative hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 1","pages":"161-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing type A aortic dissection surgery: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yan-Rong Yu, Yi-Lin Wang, Xue-Wen Zhu, Li Li, Dong-Jin Wang, Ya-Peng Wang, Jia-Xin Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-1219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common neurocognitive complication after type A aortic dissection (TAAD), which seriously affects the recovery of patients, and the current intervention timing and treatment methods are still uncertain. This prospective observational cohort study aimed to discuss the effect of dexmedetomidine on POD in patients undergoing TAAD surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2022 and March 2023, 167 eligible patients aged 18 to 85 years who underwent TAAD surgery participated in this study. The patients were assigned to either the dexmedetomidine or the control group, which did not receive dexmedetomidine treatment. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of delirium within five days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included intubation duration, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), total postoperative hospital stay, incidence of non-delirium complications, and all-cause mortality within seven days. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, the dexmedetomidine group was made up of 120 patients, whereas the control group comprised 47. The occurrence rate of POD increased from 35.0% in the dexmedetomidine group to 42.6% in the control group, but there was no significant difference [odds ratio (OR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-1.45; P=0.36]. After 1:1 PSM, there were 42 patients in each of the dexmedetomidine and control groups. The occurrence of POD was 28.6% and 45.2% in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (OR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.20-1.20; P=0.12). The dexmedetomidine group showed a shorter ICU hospitalization time and postoperative hospital stay than the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the two groups had no statistical differences in other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative dexmedetomidine did not decrease the occurrence rate of POD in TAAD patients. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the dexmedetomidine and control groups regarding the occurrence of non-delirium complications, intubation time, ICU hospitalization time, and postoperative hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"161-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1219\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后谵妄(POD)是a型主动脉夹层(TAAD)术后常见的神经认知并发症,严重影响患者的康复,目前干预时机和治疗方法仍不确定。本前瞻性观察队列研究旨在探讨右美托咪定对TAAD手术患者POD的影响。方法:在2022年2月至2023年3月期间,167名年龄在18至85岁之间接受TAAD手术的符合条件的患者参与了这项研究。患者被分配到右美托咪定组或对照组,对照组不接受右美托咪定治疗。研究的主要终点是术后5天内谵妄的发生率。次要结局包括插管时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、术后总住院时间、非谵妄并发症发生率和7天内全因死亡率。为了解释各组之间基线特征的差异,使用了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。结果:PSM前,右美托咪定组120例,对照组47例。右美托咪定组POD发生率为35.0%,对照组为42.6%,但差异无统计学意义[比值比(OR) 0.73;95%置信区间(CI): 0.37-1.45;P = 0.36)。1:1 PSM后,右美托咪定组和对照组各42例。右美托咪定组和对照组POD发生率分别为28.6%和45.2%,差异无统计学意义(OR 0.48;95% ci: 0.20-1.20;P = 0.12)。右美托咪定组患者ICU住院时间和术后住院时间均短于对照组,但差异无统计学意义。此外,两组在其他次要结局上无统计学差异。结论:术中右美托咪定未降低TAAD患者POD的发生率。此外,右美托咪定组与对照组在非谵妄并发症发生、插管时间、ICU住院时间、术后住院时间等方面均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing type A aortic dissection surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common neurocognitive complication after type A aortic dissection (TAAD), which seriously affects the recovery of patients, and the current intervention timing and treatment methods are still uncertain. This prospective observational cohort study aimed to discuss the effect of dexmedetomidine on POD in patients undergoing TAAD surgery.

Methods: Between February 2022 and March 2023, 167 eligible patients aged 18 to 85 years who underwent TAAD surgery participated in this study. The patients were assigned to either the dexmedetomidine or the control group, which did not receive dexmedetomidine treatment. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of delirium within five days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included intubation duration, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), total postoperative hospital stay, incidence of non-delirium complications, and all-cause mortality within seven days. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized.

Results: Before PSM, the dexmedetomidine group was made up of 120 patients, whereas the control group comprised 47. The occurrence rate of POD increased from 35.0% in the dexmedetomidine group to 42.6% in the control group, but there was no significant difference [odds ratio (OR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-1.45; P=0.36]. After 1:1 PSM, there were 42 patients in each of the dexmedetomidine and control groups. The occurrence of POD was 28.6% and 45.2% in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (OR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.20-1.20; P=0.12). The dexmedetomidine group showed a shorter ICU hospitalization time and postoperative hospital stay than the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the two groups had no statistical differences in other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine did not decrease the occurrence rate of POD in TAAD patients. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the dexmedetomidine and control groups regarding the occurrence of non-delirium complications, intubation time, ICU hospitalization time, and postoperative hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
Research trends in cytokine regulation of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a bibliometric and BERTopic analysis from 2015 to 2025. Erratum: Advancing lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis using peri-nodular features: a CT radiomics study for determining invasiveness in sub-centimeter pure ground glass nodules. Long-term mortality after coronary revascularization in Swedish dialysis patients with three-vessel disease: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in heart failure. A randomized controlled trial protocol of herbal formulas for modifying susceptible body constitution to enhance COVID-19 resistance in Hong Kong residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1