了解公众和医疗保健提供者在男性因素不育方面的知识差距。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-122
Bradley J Roth, Shelby Harper, Andrew Shumaker, Evonne Pei, Ava Adler, Neel Parekh, Raevti Bole, Sarah C Vij, Scott D Lundy
{"title":"了解公众和医疗保健提供者在男性因素不育方面的知识差距。","authors":"Bradley J Roth, Shelby Harper, Andrew Shumaker, Evonne Pei, Ava Adler, Neel Parekh, Raevti Bole, Sarah C Vij, Scott D Lundy","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While ongoing research continues to identify new causes for decreased sperm counts and idiopathic infertility, little objective data are known regarding public knowledge and perception of male infertility. In this study, we aim to better characterize male infertility knowledge across educational status, personal experience with infertility, socioeconomic characteristics, and income level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were asked to identify, among other factors, out-of-pocket treatment cost, insurance coverage, and potential risk factors for infertility. Then, a scoring system was developed to objectively quantify overall understanding of male infertility and named Knowledge of Male Fertility (KM-Fert). Results were compared by socioeconomic status and education level, with a sub-analysis of healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 242 respondents completed the survey. Only 67.4% of respondents (n=163) identified testosterone therapy as a risk factor for male infertility, while other commonly understood risk factors (e.g., smoking or obesity) were correctly identified by a large majority. Median KM-Fert score of reproductive urology subspecialists was a perfect score of 10. This was significantly higher than other respondents {10 [interquartile range (IQR): 9.25, 10] <i>vs</i>. 7 (IQR: 5, 8), P<0.001}. Education level influenced KM-Fert score (P<0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated a significantly higher median score for medical school graduates versus all other education levels except for nurse practitioner or physician assistant graduates (P=0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The general population has variable knowledge surrounding male fertility, and there is an opportunity for non-urology providers to improve their knowledge, screening, and referrals for reproductive-aged males. Reproductive urologists may be the ideal group to educate fellow HCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 1","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding general public and healthcare provider knowledge gaps in male factor infertility.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley J Roth, Shelby Harper, Andrew Shumaker, Evonne Pei, Ava Adler, Neel Parekh, Raevti Bole, Sarah C Vij, Scott D Lundy\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-24-122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While ongoing research continues to identify new causes for decreased sperm counts and idiopathic infertility, little objective data are known regarding public knowledge and perception of male infertility. In this study, we aim to better characterize male infertility knowledge across educational status, personal experience with infertility, socioeconomic characteristics, and income level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were asked to identify, among other factors, out-of-pocket treatment cost, insurance coverage, and potential risk factors for infertility. Then, a scoring system was developed to objectively quantify overall understanding of male infertility and named Knowledge of Male Fertility (KM-Fert). Results were compared by socioeconomic status and education level, with a sub-analysis of healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 242 respondents completed the survey. Only 67.4% of respondents (n=163) identified testosterone therapy as a risk factor for male infertility, while other commonly understood risk factors (e.g., smoking or obesity) were correctly identified by a large majority. Median KM-Fert score of reproductive urology subspecialists was a perfect score of 10. This was significantly higher than other respondents {10 [interquartile range (IQR): 9.25, 10] <i>vs</i>. 7 (IQR: 5, 8), P<0.001}. Education level influenced KM-Fert score (P<0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated a significantly higher median score for medical school graduates versus all other education levels except for nurse practitioner or physician assistant graduates (P=0.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The general population has variable knowledge surrounding male fertility, and there is an opportunity for non-urology providers to improve their knowledge, screening, and referrals for reproductive-aged males. Reproductive urologists may be the ideal group to educate fellow HCPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"27-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然正在进行的研究继续确定精子数量减少和特发性不育症的新原因,但关于公众对男性不育症的认识和看法,很少有客观数据。在这项研究中,我们的目的是更好地描述男性不育症知识,包括教育状况、个人不育症经历、社会经济特征和收入水平。方法:参与者被要求确定,除其他因素外,自付治疗费用,保险范围和不孕不育的潜在危险因素。然后,开发了一个客观量化男性不育总体认识的评分系统,命名为男性生育知识(KM-Fert)。结果按社会经济地位和教育水平进行比较,并对卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)进行亚分析。结果:共242人完成调查。只有67.4%的受访者(n=163)认为睾酮治疗是男性不育症的危险因素,而其他常见的危险因素(如吸烟或肥胖)被大多数人正确识别。生殖泌尿科专科的KM-Fert评分中位数为满分10分。这明显高于其他调查对象{10[四分位间距(IQR): 9.25, 10]和7 (IQR: 5,8)。结论:一般人群对男性生育能力的了解是不同的,非泌尿科医生有机会提高他们对育龄男性的知识、筛查和转诊。生殖泌尿科医生可能是教育医护人员的理想群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding general public and healthcare provider knowledge gaps in male factor infertility.

Background: While ongoing research continues to identify new causes for decreased sperm counts and idiopathic infertility, little objective data are known regarding public knowledge and perception of male infertility. In this study, we aim to better characterize male infertility knowledge across educational status, personal experience with infertility, socioeconomic characteristics, and income level.

Methods: Participants were asked to identify, among other factors, out-of-pocket treatment cost, insurance coverage, and potential risk factors for infertility. Then, a scoring system was developed to objectively quantify overall understanding of male infertility and named Knowledge of Male Fertility (KM-Fert). Results were compared by socioeconomic status and education level, with a sub-analysis of healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Results: A total of 242 respondents completed the survey. Only 67.4% of respondents (n=163) identified testosterone therapy as a risk factor for male infertility, while other commonly understood risk factors (e.g., smoking or obesity) were correctly identified by a large majority. Median KM-Fert score of reproductive urology subspecialists was a perfect score of 10. This was significantly higher than other respondents {10 [interquartile range (IQR): 9.25, 10] vs. 7 (IQR: 5, 8), P<0.001}. Education level influenced KM-Fert score (P<0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated a significantly higher median score for medical school graduates versus all other education levels except for nurse practitioner or physician assistant graduates (P=0.28).

Conclusions: The general population has variable knowledge surrounding male fertility, and there is an opportunity for non-urology providers to improve their knowledge, screening, and referrals for reproductive-aged males. Reproductive urologists may be the ideal group to educate fellow HCPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
Construction of a survival model for predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer based on propionate metabolism-related genes. From symptomatic relief to restorative medicine: a comprehensive review of diabetic erectile dysfunction. Evaluation of collagen membrane grafting in managing Peyronie's disease and penile curvature: a pilot study. Global research landscape and technological breakthroughs in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence management: a bibliometric review and visualized study. Development and validation of an MRI radiomics-based model for predicting progression risk in prostate cancer after endocrine therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1