Sarah N. Obeidalla MEd , Gordon R. Bernard MD , Lorraine B. Ware MD , V. Eric Kerchberger MD
{"title":"Acetaminophen and Clinical Outcomes in Sepsis","authors":"Sarah N. Obeidalla MEd , Gordon R. Bernard MD , Lorraine B. Ware MD , V. Eric Kerchberger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Ibuprofen in Sepsis Study (ISS) randomized trial found no difference in duration of shock, ARDS, or mortality with ibuprofen treatment for sepsis. However, higher use of acetaminophen, a known hemoprotein reductant with potentially beneficial effects in sepsis, as an antipyretic in the control arm may have masked the clinical benefits from either drug.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Does an association exist between administration of acetaminophen and clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of the previously reported ISS trial. We created a propensity score for receiving acetaminophen during the first 2 study days using sex, age, presence of shock at enrollment, trial study drug assignment (ibuprofen or placebo), febrile status at enrollment, need for mechanical ventilation, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score at enrollment, and then matched trial participants 1:1 into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups based on their propensity scores. We tested the association between receipt of acetaminophen with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included development of renal failure and ventilator-free days (VFDs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 455 patients in the original trial, 276 patients (61%) were matched into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups. In the propensity-matched analysis, we found a lower mortality among acetaminophen-exposed patients compared with acetaminophen-unexposed patients (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; <em>P</em> = .004). Additionally, acetaminophen-exposed patients experienced more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation compared with the acetaminophen-unexposed patients (OR, 2.09 for having 19-28 VFDs vs 0 or 1-18 VFDs; 95% CI, 1.12-3.95; <em>P</em> = .02). We observed no significant association between renal failure and receipt of acetaminophen.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this propensity-matched retrospective analysis, adults with sepsis who received acetaminophen showed decreased mortality and more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation. This study highlights the potential of acetaminophen as a modulator of outcomes in sepsis and warrants further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景脓毒症布洛芬研究(ISS)随机试验发现,布洛芬治疗脓毒症在休克持续时间、ARDS或死亡率方面没有差异。研究设计与方法我们对之前报道的 ISS 试验进行了回顾性倾向匹配分析。我们利用性别、年龄、入院时是否休克、试验研究药物分配(布洛芬或安慰剂)、入院时发热状态、机械通气需求以及入院时急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分等因素,为试验参与者在前 2 个研究日接受对乙酰氨基酚的倾向性评分,然后根据倾向性评分将试验参与者按 1:1 的比例分为接触对乙酰氨基酚组和未接触对乙酰氨基酚组。我们以接受对乙酰氨基酚与 30 天死亡率之间的关系作为主要结果进行了测试。结果 在原始试验的 455 名患者中,276 名患者(61%)被分为对乙酰氨基酚暴露组和对乙酰氨基酚未暴露组。在倾向匹配分析中,我们发现对乙酰氨基酚暴露组患者的死亡率低于对乙酰氨基酚未暴露组患者(危险比为 0.58;95% CI 为 0.40-0.84;P = .004)。此外,与未暴露于对乙酰氨基酚的患者相比,暴露于对乙酰氨基酚的患者的存活天数和无需机械通气的天数更多(OR,2.09,19-28 VFDs vs 0 or 1-18 VFDs;95% CI,1.12-3.95;P = .02)。在这项倾向匹配的回顾性分析中,接受对乙酰氨基酚治疗的成人败血症患者死亡率下降,存活天数增加,无需机械通气。这项研究强调了对乙酰氨基酚作为败血症预后调节剂的潜力,值得进一步研究。
The Ibuprofen in Sepsis Study (ISS) randomized trial found no difference in duration of shock, ARDS, or mortality with ibuprofen treatment for sepsis. However, higher use of acetaminophen, a known hemoprotein reductant with potentially beneficial effects in sepsis, as an antipyretic in the control arm may have masked the clinical benefits from either drug.
Research Question
Does an association exist between administration of acetaminophen and clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis?
Study Design and Methods
We performed a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of the previously reported ISS trial. We created a propensity score for receiving acetaminophen during the first 2 study days using sex, age, presence of shock at enrollment, trial study drug assignment (ibuprofen or placebo), febrile status at enrollment, need for mechanical ventilation, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score at enrollment, and then matched trial participants 1:1 into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups based on their propensity scores. We tested the association between receipt of acetaminophen with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included development of renal failure and ventilator-free days (VFDs).
Results
Of 455 patients in the original trial, 276 patients (61%) were matched into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups. In the propensity-matched analysis, we found a lower mortality among acetaminophen-exposed patients compared with acetaminophen-unexposed patients (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; P = .004). Additionally, acetaminophen-exposed patients experienced more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation compared with the acetaminophen-unexposed patients (OR, 2.09 for having 19-28 VFDs vs 0 or 1-18 VFDs; 95% CI, 1.12-3.95; P = .02). We observed no significant association between renal failure and receipt of acetaminophen.
Interpretation
In this propensity-matched retrospective analysis, adults with sepsis who received acetaminophen showed decreased mortality and more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation. This study highlights the potential of acetaminophen as a modulator of outcomes in sepsis and warrants further investigation.