Sarah N. Obeidalla MEd , Gordon R. Bernard MD , Lorraine B. Ware MD , V. Eric Kerchberger MD
{"title":"Acetaminophen and Clinical Outcomes in Sepsis","authors":"Sarah N. Obeidalla MEd ,&nbsp;Gordon R. Bernard MD ,&nbsp;Lorraine B. Ware MD ,&nbsp;V. Eric Kerchberger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Ibuprofen in Sepsis Study (ISS) randomized trial found no difference in duration of shock, ARDS, or mortality with ibuprofen treatment for sepsis. However, higher use of acetaminophen, a known hemoprotein reductant with potentially beneficial effects in sepsis, as an antipyretic in the control arm may have masked the clinical benefits from either drug.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Does an association exist between administration of acetaminophen and clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of the previously reported ISS trial. We created a propensity score for receiving acetaminophen during the first 2 study days using sex, age, presence of shock at enrollment, trial study drug assignment (ibuprofen or placebo), febrile status at enrollment, need for mechanical ventilation, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score at enrollment, and then matched trial participants 1:1 into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups based on their propensity scores. We tested the association between receipt of acetaminophen with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included development of renal failure and ventilator-free days (VFDs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 455 patients in the original trial, 276 patients (61%) were matched into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups. In the propensity-matched analysis, we found a lower mortality among acetaminophen-exposed patients compared with acetaminophen-unexposed patients (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; <em>P</em> = .004). Additionally, acetaminophen-exposed patients experienced more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation compared with the acetaminophen-unexposed patients (OR, 2.09 for having 19-28 VFDs vs 0 or 1-18 VFDs; 95% CI, 1.12-3.95; <em>P</em> = .02). We observed no significant association between renal failure and receipt of acetaminophen.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this propensity-matched retrospective analysis, adults with sepsis who received acetaminophen showed decreased mortality and more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation. This study highlights the potential of acetaminophen as a modulator of outcomes in sepsis and warrants further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景脓毒症布洛芬研究(ISS)随机试验发现,布洛芬治疗脓毒症在休克持续时间、ARDS或死亡率方面没有差异。研究设计与方法我们对之前报道的 ISS 试验进行了回顾性倾向匹配分析。我们利用性别、年龄、入院时是否休克、试验研究药物分配(布洛芬或安慰剂)、入院时发热状态、机械通气需求以及入院时急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分等因素,为试验参与者在前 2 个研究日接受对乙酰氨基酚的倾向性评分,然后根据倾向性评分将试验参与者按 1:1 的比例分为接触对乙酰氨基酚组和未接触对乙酰氨基酚组。我们以接受对乙酰氨基酚与 30 天死亡率之间的关系作为主要结果进行了测试。结果 在原始试验的 455 名患者中,276 名患者(61%)被分为对乙酰氨基酚暴露组和对乙酰氨基酚未暴露组。在倾向匹配分析中,我们发现对乙酰氨基酚暴露组患者的死亡率低于对乙酰氨基酚未暴露组患者(危险比为 0.58;95% CI 为 0.40-0.84;P = .004)。此外,与未暴露于对乙酰氨基酚的患者相比,暴露于对乙酰氨基酚的患者的存活天数和无需机械通气的天数更多(OR,2.09,19-28 VFDs vs 0 or 1-18 VFDs;95% CI,1.12-3.95;P = .02)。在这项倾向匹配的回顾性分析中,接受对乙酰氨基酚治疗的成人败血症患者死亡率下降,存活天数增加,无需机械通气。这项研究强调了对乙酰氨基酚作为败血症预后调节剂的潜力,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acetaminophen and Clinical Outcomes in Sepsis

Background

The Ibuprofen in Sepsis Study (ISS) randomized trial found no difference in duration of shock, ARDS, or mortality with ibuprofen treatment for sepsis. However, higher use of acetaminophen, a known hemoprotein reductant with potentially beneficial effects in sepsis, as an antipyretic in the control arm may have masked the clinical benefits from either drug.

Research Question

Does an association exist between administration of acetaminophen and clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis?

Study Design and Methods

We performed a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of the previously reported ISS trial. We created a propensity score for receiving acetaminophen during the first 2 study days using sex, age, presence of shock at enrollment, trial study drug assignment (ibuprofen or placebo), febrile status at enrollment, need for mechanical ventilation, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score at enrollment, and then matched trial participants 1:1 into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups based on their propensity scores. We tested the association between receipt of acetaminophen with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included development of renal failure and ventilator-free days (VFDs).

Results

Of 455 patients in the original trial, 276 patients (61%) were matched into acetaminophen-exposed and acetaminophen-unexposed groups. In the propensity-matched analysis, we found a lower mortality among acetaminophen-exposed patients compared with acetaminophen-unexposed patients (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; P = .004). Additionally, acetaminophen-exposed patients experienced more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation compared with the acetaminophen-unexposed patients (OR, 2.09 for having 19-28 VFDs vs 0 or 1-18 VFDs; 95% CI, 1.12-3.95; P = .02). We observed no significant association between renal failure and receipt of acetaminophen.

Interpretation

In this propensity-matched retrospective analysis, adults with sepsis who received acetaminophen showed decreased mortality and more days alive and free of mechanical ventilation. This study highlights the potential of acetaminophen as a modulator of outcomes in sepsis and warrants further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Initial Opioid Exposure in the ICU and 1-Year Opioid-Related Outcomes in Patients Who Are Mechanically Ventilated Developing Core Outcome (Measurement) Sets for Critical Care Research Using the Modified Delphi Method Managing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in the ICU Lactation Practices in Critically Ill Patients Feasibility of Measuring Driving Pressure and Patient Effort in Assisted Modes of Ventilation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1