IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1444465
Wiem Issaoui, Ismail Dergaa, Hatem Ghouili, Abdelfatteh El Omri, Noomen Guelmami, Philippe Chomier, Mourad Ghrairi, Helmi Ben Saad, Wassim Moalla
{"title":"A comparative analysis of autograft choices of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their effects on muscle strength and joint biomechanics.","authors":"Wiem Issaoui, Ismail Dergaa, Hatem Ghouili, Abdelfatteh El Omri, Noomen Guelmami, Philippe Chomier, Mourad Ghrairi, Helmi Ben Saad, Wassim Moalla","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1444465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is crucial to restore knee stability and function after ACL injuries, especially in physically active individuals. Despite advances in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, the choice of autograft has a significant impact on postoperative recovery, particularly on muscle strength and joint biomechanics. In this study, the effects of four autografts are investigated: Iliotibial band (ITB), combined ITB and hamstring tendon (ITB + HT), hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-tendon-bone (BTB) on quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT) recovery and hamstring to quadriceps ratio (H:Q) to assess knee stability and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two active males (mean ± standard deviation of age: 31.5 ± 6.1 years, height: 177 ± 6 cm, weight: 76 ± 11 kg, body mass index: 24.5 ± 2.2 kg/m²) with primary ACL ruptures were allocated to the four graft groups (ITB: <i>n</i> = 16, ITB + HT: <i>n</i> = 12, HT: <i>n</i> = 7, BTB: <i>n</i> = 7) and underwent a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT, respectively) as indicators of isokinetic muscle strength were assessed both postoperatively and follow-up after approximately six months (mean 6.29 ± 1.70 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in QPT and HPT recovery between the healthy and injured legs were found in all graft groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The BTB group showed the largest QPT deficit between healthy and injured legs (Δ = 133.4 Nm, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 8.05) and HPT deficit (Δ = 41.1 Nm, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 4.01). In contrast, the ITB + HT group showed the smallest deficits in QPT (Δ = 22.5 Nm, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.73) and HPT (Δ = 13.5 Nm, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.21). The BTB group also showed the largest deviation in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.23, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 2.70), while the HT group showed a more balanced recovery with smaller significant deficits in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.07, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BTB graft showed the most pronounced variations in QPT and HPT between healthy and injured legs in the short term, indicating the importance of longitudinally monitoring knee stability to determine the best autograft choice for ACLR. While all graft types contribute to muscle strength recovery, the HT graft may provide advantages in balancing muscle strength and potentially enhancing knee stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1444465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1444465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)对于恢复前交叉韧带损伤后膝关节的稳定性和功能至关重要,尤其是对于运动量大的人。尽管手术技术和康复方案不断进步,但自体移植物的选择对术后恢复仍有重大影响,尤其是对肌肉力量和关节生物力学的影响。本研究调查了四种自体移植物的效果:髂胫束(ITB)、ITB 和腘绳肌腱组合(ITB + HT)、腘绳肌腱(HT)和骨-肌腱-骨(BTB)对股四头肌和股四头肌峰值扭矩(QPT 和 HPT)恢复以及腘绳肌与股四头肌比率(H:Q)的影响,以评估膝关节稳定性和功能:42 名活跃的男性(平均年龄:31.5±6.1 岁,身高:177±6 厘米,体重:76±11 千克,体重指数:24.5±2.2 千克):前交叉韧带原发性断裂患者被分配到四个移植组(ITB:n = 16、ITB + HT:n = 12、HT:n = 7、BTB:n = 7),并接受标准化康复方案。作为等动肌力指标的股四头肌和腘绳肌峰值扭矩(QPT 和 HPT)分别在术后和大约六个月后的随访中进行了评估(平均 6.29 ± 1.70 个月):在所有移植组中,健康腿和受伤腿的 QPT 和 HPT 恢复均存在显著差异(P d = 8.05),HPT 缺陷(Δ = 41.1 牛米,Cohen's d = 4.01)。相比之下,ITB + HT 组的 QPT(Δ = 22.5 牛米,Cohen's d = 0.73)和 HPT(Δ = 13.5 牛米,Cohen's d = 1.21)缺损最小。BTB 组的 H:Q 比值偏差也最大(Δ = -0.23,Cohen's d = 2.70),而 HT 组的恢复更为均衡,H:Q 比值的显著偏差较小(Δ = -0.07,Cohen's d = 0.46):结论:BTB移植物在短期内显示出健康腿和受伤腿之间最明显的QPT和HPT差异,这表明纵向监测膝关节稳定性以确定前交叉韧带置换术最佳自体移植物选择的重要性。虽然所有类型的移植物都有助于肌力恢复,但 HT 移植物可能在平衡肌力和增强膝关节稳定性方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of autograft choices of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their effects on muscle strength and joint biomechanics.

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is crucial to restore knee stability and function after ACL injuries, especially in physically active individuals. Despite advances in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, the choice of autograft has a significant impact on postoperative recovery, particularly on muscle strength and joint biomechanics. In this study, the effects of four autografts are investigated: Iliotibial band (ITB), combined ITB and hamstring tendon (ITB + HT), hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-tendon-bone (BTB) on quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT) recovery and hamstring to quadriceps ratio (H:Q) to assess knee stability and function.

Methods: Forty-two active males (mean ± standard deviation of age: 31.5 ± 6.1 years, height: 177 ± 6 cm, weight: 76 ± 11 kg, body mass index: 24.5 ± 2.2 kg/m²) with primary ACL ruptures were allocated to the four graft groups (ITB: n = 16, ITB + HT: n = 12, HT: n = 7, BTB: n = 7) and underwent a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT, respectively) as indicators of isokinetic muscle strength were assessed both postoperatively and follow-up after approximately six months (mean 6.29 ± 1.70 months).

Results: Significant differences in QPT and HPT recovery between the healthy and injured legs were found in all graft groups (P < 0.001). The BTB group showed the largest QPT deficit between healthy and injured legs (Δ = 133.4 Nm, Cohen's d = 8.05) and HPT deficit (Δ = 41.1 Nm, Cohen's d = 4.01). In contrast, the ITB + HT group showed the smallest deficits in QPT (Δ = 22.5 Nm, Cohen's d = 0.73) and HPT (Δ = 13.5 Nm, Cohen's d = 1.21). The BTB group also showed the largest deviation in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.23, Cohen's d = 2.70), while the HT group showed a more balanced recovery with smaller significant deficits in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.07, Cohen's d = 0.46).

Conclusion: The BTB graft showed the most pronounced variations in QPT and HPT between healthy and injured legs in the short term, indicating the importance of longitudinally monitoring knee stability to determine the best autograft choice for ACLR. While all graft types contribute to muscle strength recovery, the HT graft may provide advantages in balancing muscle strength and potentially enhancing knee stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Training load in sport: current challenges and future perspectives. Speciality Grand Challenge: Existing and emerging issues for physical activity in the prevention and management of disease and the promotion of wellbeing. Corrigendum: Addressing grading bias in rock climbing: machine and deep learning approaches. Relative age effects in European soccer: their association with contextual factors, impact on youth national teams' performance, and presence at the senior level. Stakeholders' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to implementing extra physical activity in secondary schools to improve adolescents' health and academic performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1