Noam Goder, Shiran Gabay, Jawad Tome, Eran Nizri, Yael Lichter, Meir Zemel
{"title":"腹腔镜肠道手术患者的小肠超声护理点:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Noam Goder, Shiran Gabay, Jawad Tome, Eran Nizri, Yael Lichter, Meir Zemel","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10618-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized in clinical medicine, yet its role in assessing normal postoperative bowel function remains underexplored, particularly after laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study of 20 laparoscopic bowel resection patients was conducted, utilizing small bowel POCUS before surgery and daily from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 4. Small bowel width and a Small Bowel Motility Index (SBMI) were recorded in each examination. Statistical analyses involved repeated measures ANOVA to evaluate motility and width changes over study days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The small bowel motility index displayed statistically significant differences across the study days before surgery up to POD4 (P<0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between pre-surgery (10.58±1.31) and POD1 (8.20±2.30) with a mean difference of 2.38 (P=0.009). Subsequent days demonstrated significant differences between POD1 and POD3 (9.78±1.51) and POD4 (10.30±2.05) with mean differences of -1.58 (P=0.049) and -2.10 (P=0.029) respectively. In contrast, small bowel width did not exhibit statistical significance during this follow-up period (P=0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the dynamic nature of small bowel motility, highlighting its potential as a crucial parameter for postoperative assessment. Further larger studies with vareity of patients are warranted to explore the broader applications of small bowel POCUS in postoperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point of care ultrasound of small intestine in patients undergoing laparoscopic bowel surgery: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Noam Goder, Shiran Gabay, Jawad Tome, Eran Nizri, Yael Lichter, Meir Zemel\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10618-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized in clinical medicine, yet its role in assessing normal postoperative bowel function remains underexplored, particularly after laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study of 20 laparoscopic bowel resection patients was conducted, utilizing small bowel POCUS before surgery and daily from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 4. Small bowel width and a Small Bowel Motility Index (SBMI) were recorded in each examination. Statistical analyses involved repeated measures ANOVA to evaluate motility and width changes over study days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The small bowel motility index displayed statistically significant differences across the study days before surgery up to POD4 (P<0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between pre-surgery (10.58±1.31) and POD1 (8.20±2.30) with a mean difference of 2.38 (P=0.009). Subsequent days demonstrated significant differences between POD1 and POD3 (9.78±1.51) and POD4 (10.30±2.05) with mean differences of -1.58 (P=0.049) and -2.10 (P=0.029) respectively. In contrast, small bowel width did not exhibit statistical significance during this follow-up period (P=0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the dynamic nature of small bowel motility, highlighting its potential as a crucial parameter for postoperative assessment. Further larger studies with vareity of patients are warranted to explore the broader applications of small bowel POCUS in postoperative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10618-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10618-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Point of care ultrasound of small intestine in patients undergoing laparoscopic bowel surgery: a prospective observational study.
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized in clinical medicine, yet its role in assessing normal postoperative bowel function remains underexplored, particularly after laparoscopic colorectal surgeries.
Methods: A prospective cohort study of 20 laparoscopic bowel resection patients was conducted, utilizing small bowel POCUS before surgery and daily from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 4. Small bowel width and a Small Bowel Motility Index (SBMI) were recorded in each examination. Statistical analyses involved repeated measures ANOVA to evaluate motility and width changes over study days.
Results: The small bowel motility index displayed statistically significant differences across the study days before surgery up to POD4 (P<0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between pre-surgery (10.58±1.31) and POD1 (8.20±2.30) with a mean difference of 2.38 (P=0.009). Subsequent days demonstrated significant differences between POD1 and POD3 (9.78±1.51) and POD4 (10.30±2.05) with mean differences of -1.58 (P=0.049) and -2.10 (P=0.029) respectively. In contrast, small bowel width did not exhibit statistical significance during this follow-up period (P=0.112).
Conclusions: Our findings underscore the dynamic nature of small bowel motility, highlighting its potential as a crucial parameter for postoperative assessment. Further larger studies with vareity of patients are warranted to explore the broader applications of small bowel POCUS in postoperative care.