应用人工智能预测退行性胸腰椎手术并发症:系统综述。

Q3 Medicine Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.007
G. Ricciardi , J.I. Cirillo Totera , R. Pons Belmonte , L. Romero Valverde , F. López Muñoz , A. Manríquez Díaz
{"title":"应用人工智能预测退行性胸腰椎手术并发症:系统综述。","authors":"G. Ricciardi ,&nbsp;J.I. Cirillo Totera ,&nbsp;R. Pons Belmonte ,&nbsp;L. Romero Valverde ,&nbsp;F. López Muñoz ,&nbsp;A. Manríquez Díaz","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aim to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence prediction models in predicting complications in adult patients undergoing surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar pathology compared with other commonly used prediction techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted in Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs/Portal de la BVS to identify machine learning models in predicting complications in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar spine pathology between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool. Study characteristics and outcomes focusing on general or specific complications were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,341 titles were identified (763 were duplicates). Screening was performed on 1,578 titles, and 22 were selected for full-text reading, with 18 exclusions and 4 publications selected for the subsequent review. Additionally, 8 publications were included from other sources (Argentine Association of Orthopedics and Traumatology Library; manual citation search). In 5 (41.6%) articles, the effectiveness of artificial intelligence predictive models was compared with conventional techniques. All were globally classified as having a very high risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity in samples, outcomes of interest, and algorithm evaluation metrics, a meta-analysis was not performed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the available evidence is limited and carries a high risk of bias, the studies analysed suggest that these models may achieve promising performance in predicting complications, with area under the curve values mostly ranging from acceptable to excellent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":"69 5","pages":"Pages 446-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uso de inteligencia artificial para predecir complicaciones en cirugías de columna toracolumbar degenerativa: revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"G. Ricciardi ,&nbsp;J.I. Cirillo Totera ,&nbsp;R. Pons Belmonte ,&nbsp;L. Romero Valverde ,&nbsp;F. López Muñoz ,&nbsp;A. Manríquez Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aim to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence prediction models in predicting complications in adult patients undergoing surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar pathology compared with other commonly used prediction techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted in Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs/Portal de la BVS to identify machine learning models in predicting complications in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar spine pathology between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool. Study characteristics and outcomes focusing on general or specific complications were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,341 titles were identified (763 were duplicates). Screening was performed on 1,578 titles, and 22 were selected for full-text reading, with 18 exclusions and 4 publications selected for the subsequent review. Additionally, 8 publications were included from other sources (Argentine Association of Orthopedics and Traumatology Library; manual citation search). In 5 (41.6%) articles, the effectiveness of artificial intelligence predictive models was compared with conventional techniques. All were globally classified as having a very high risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity in samples, outcomes of interest, and algorithm evaluation metrics, a meta-analysis was not performed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the available evidence is limited and carries a high risk of bias, the studies analysed suggest that these models may achieve promising performance in predicting complications, with area under the curve values mostly ranging from acceptable to excellent.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 446-460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441525000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在对文献进行系统回顾,以评估人工智能预测模型与其他常用预测技术在预测退行性胸腰椎病变成人手术并发症方面的有效性。方法:在Medline/Pubmed、Cochrane Library和Lilacs/Portal de la BVS中进行系统的文献综述,以确定机器学习模型在预测2000年1月1日至2023年5月1日期间行退行性胸腰椎病理手术患者并发症中的应用。使用PROBAST工具评估偏倚风险。记录一般或特定并发症的研究特征和结果。结果:共鉴定出2341篇文献,其中重复文献763篇。对1578篇文献进行筛选,其中22篇入选全文阅读,18篇被排除,4篇入选后续综述。此外,从其他来源纳入了8份出版物(阿根廷骨科和创伤学协会图书馆;人工引文检索)。在5篇(41.6%)的文章中,人工智能预测模型与传统技术的有效性进行了比较。所有这些都被全球归类为具有非常高的偏倚风险。由于样本、感兴趣的结果和算法评估指标的异质性,没有进行meta分析。结论:虽然现有的证据有限且存在较高的偏倚风险,但分析的研究表明,这些模型在预测并发症方面可能取得很好的效果,曲线下面积值大多在可接受到优秀之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uso de inteligencia artificial para predecir complicaciones en cirugías de columna toracolumbar degenerativa: revisión sistemática

Objective

We aim to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence prediction models in predicting complications in adult patients undergoing surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar pathology compared with other commonly used prediction techniques.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted in Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs/Portal de la BVS to identify machine learning models in predicting complications in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative thoracolumbar spine pathology between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the PROBAST tool. Study characteristics and outcomes focusing on general or specific complications were recorded.

Results

A total of 2,341 titles were identified (763 were duplicates). Screening was performed on 1,578 titles, and 22 were selected for full-text reading, with 18 exclusions and 4 publications selected for the subsequent review. Additionally, 8 publications were included from other sources (Argentine Association of Orthopedics and Traumatology Library; manual citation search). In 5 (41.6%) articles, the effectiveness of artificial intelligence predictive models was compared with conventional techniques. All were globally classified as having a very high risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity in samples, outcomes of interest, and algorithm evaluation metrics, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Conclusion

Although the available evidence is limited and carries a high risk of bias, the studies analysed suggest that these models may achieve promising performance in predicting complications, with area under the curve values mostly ranging from acceptable to excellent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
[Translated article] Influence of prosthetic lateralization on tuberosity healing in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Optimization in Pubic Ramus Fractures: Is Plain Radiography Sufficient? Outcomes of Metastasectomy in Patients with Solitary Bone Metastases: Experience from a Cancer Center in Bogotá, Colombia. Comparative analysis between intramedullary screw fixation and plate osteosynthesis in midshaft clavicle fractures: Surgical efficiency and functional outcomes in contact athletes. Epidemiological trends in pediatric knee arthroscopy: a single-centre study in Spain (1998-2023).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1