IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Pain and Headache Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s11916-025-01369-0
Alan D Kaye, Amy E Brouillette, Cameron A Howe, Sheeza Wajid, Joseph R Archer, Rachael Bartolina, Jon D Hirsch, Jeffrey T Howard, Daniel Bass, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Laxmaiah Manchikanti
{"title":"Efficacy of Steroid Facet Joint Injections for Axial Spinal Pain and Post Radiofrequency Ablation Neuritis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Amy E Brouillette, Cameron A Howe, Sheeza Wajid, Joseph R Archer, Rachael Bartolina, Jon D Hirsch, Jeffrey T Howard, Daniel Bass, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Laxmaiah Manchikanti","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01369-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chronic axial spinal pain is a leading cause of disability and healthcare spending in the United States. A common source of axial spinal pain is the facet joint. Current treatments for facet joint-mediated pain include conservative treatments and interventions such as intra-articular facet joint injections (FJI), medial branch blocks (MBB), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While facet joint interventions are one of the most common spinal procedures, current scientific literature demonstrates conflicting results regarding the use of corticosteroids in these interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of local corticosteroid usage in facet joint interventions for treating chronic axial spinal pain. Separate literature searches were performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library to evaluate the use of local corticosteroids in intra-articular FJI, MBB, and for the prevention of post-neurotomy neuritis (PNN). Inclusion criteria included a randomized clinical trial (RCT) or control trial while unique inclusion criteria was used for the differing uses of local corticosteroids. The exclusion criteria for studies included (i) studies written in a non-English language; (ii) articles without full-text access or abstract-only papers; (iii) and studies focused on non-human subjects. Final literature searches were conducted in August 2024. Two studies with 131 patients, four studies with 440 patients, and two studies with 203 patients were selected for the assessment of local corticosteroid use on intra-articular FJI, MBB, and PNN, respectively. A quality assessment tool recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess bias risk in included studies. Results were synthesized through a meta-analysis to evaluate intra-articular FJI while a literature analysis was completed to investigate MBB and PNN. This study found that the use of corticosteroid intra-articular FJI and MBB provides significant improvement in pain relief and functionality from baseline for the treatment of lower back pain and chronic axial spinal pain, respectively. However, the use of corticosteroids post-RFA has not been proven to reduce the occurrence of PNN. Limitations to the studies used included blinding bias, absence of placebo groups, subjective inclusion criteria, limited generalizability and small sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01369-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:在美国,慢性脊柱轴痛是导致残疾和医疗支出的主要原因。脊柱轴向疼痛的常见来源是面关节。目前治疗面关节引起的疼痛的方法包括保守疗法和干预措施,如关节内面关节注射(FJI)、内侧支阻滞(MBB)和射频消融(RFA)。虽然面关节介入治疗是最常见的脊柱手术之一,但目前的科学文献显示,在这些介入治疗中使用皮质类固醇的结果相互矛盾:为了确定局部皮质类固醇在治疗慢性轴性脊柱疼痛的面关节介入疗法中的使用效果,我们进行了一项系统性研究。我们使用 PubMed、Google Scholar、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 分别进行了文献检索,以评估局部皮质类固醇在关节内 FJI、MBB 和预防神经切除术后神经炎 (PNN) 中的使用情况。纳入标准包括随机临床试验(RCT)或对照试验,而针对局部皮质类固醇的不同用途则采用了独特的纳入标准。研究的排除标准包括:(i) 以非英语撰写的研究;(ii) 没有全文访问权限的文章或仅有摘要的论文;(iii) 以非人类为研究对象的研究。最终文献检索于 2024 年 8 月进行。在评估局部使用皮质类固醇对关节内 FJI、MBB 和 PNN 的影响时,分别选择了 2 项研究(131 名患者)、4 项研究(440 名患者)和 2 项研究(203 名患者)。采用 Cochrane 协作组织推荐的质量评估工具来评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。通过荟萃分析对结果进行综合,以评估关节内 FJI,同时完成文献分析以调查 MBB 和 PNN。该研究发现,使用皮质类固醇关节内 FJI 和 MBB 治疗下背痛和慢性脊柱轴性疼痛,可分别显著改善疼痛缓解程度和功能基线。然而,RFA 术后使用皮质类固醇尚未证明能减少 PNN 的发生。所用研究的局限性包括盲法偏差、缺乏安慰剂组、主观纳入标准、推广性有限以及样本量较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Steroid Facet Joint Injections for Axial Spinal Pain and Post Radiofrequency Ablation Neuritis: A Systematic Review.

Purpose of review: Chronic axial spinal pain is a leading cause of disability and healthcare spending in the United States. A common source of axial spinal pain is the facet joint. Current treatments for facet joint-mediated pain include conservative treatments and interventions such as intra-articular facet joint injections (FJI), medial branch blocks (MBB), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While facet joint interventions are one of the most common spinal procedures, current scientific literature demonstrates conflicting results regarding the use of corticosteroids in these interventions.

Recent findings: A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of local corticosteroid usage in facet joint interventions for treating chronic axial spinal pain. Separate literature searches were performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library to evaluate the use of local corticosteroids in intra-articular FJI, MBB, and for the prevention of post-neurotomy neuritis (PNN). Inclusion criteria included a randomized clinical trial (RCT) or control trial while unique inclusion criteria was used for the differing uses of local corticosteroids. The exclusion criteria for studies included (i) studies written in a non-English language; (ii) articles without full-text access or abstract-only papers; (iii) and studies focused on non-human subjects. Final literature searches were conducted in August 2024. Two studies with 131 patients, four studies with 440 patients, and two studies with 203 patients were selected for the assessment of local corticosteroid use on intra-articular FJI, MBB, and PNN, respectively. A quality assessment tool recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess bias risk in included studies. Results were synthesized through a meta-analysis to evaluate intra-articular FJI while a literature analysis was completed to investigate MBB and PNN. This study found that the use of corticosteroid intra-articular FJI and MBB provides significant improvement in pain relief and functionality from baseline for the treatment of lower back pain and chronic axial spinal pain, respectively. However, the use of corticosteroids post-RFA has not been proven to reduce the occurrence of PNN. Limitations to the studies used included blinding bias, absence of placebo groups, subjective inclusion criteria, limited generalizability and small sample sizes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Mixed Pain Research Over Three Decades (1993-2024): A Bibliometric Analysis. Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Blocks for Pain Management Following Total Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review. The Current Status and Future Prospects of Intra-articular Injection Therapy for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review. Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review. A Systematic Review of Sacroiliac Joint Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma (Prp) and Stem Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1