质子泵抑制剂与种植牙失败风险之间有关系吗?利用 BigMouth 储存库进行的大规模回顾性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.003
Georgios S Chatzopoulos, Larry F Wolff
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与种植牙失败风险之间有关系吗?利用 BigMouth 储存库进行的大规模回顾性研究。","authors":"Georgios S Chatzopoulos, Larry F Wolff","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this retrospective large-scale study was to investigate long-term the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and risk of dental implant failure. This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients rehabilitated with dental implants in the dental clinics of the universities that contribute data to the BigMouth network. Patients' characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, race, tobacco use, systemic medical conditions, and intake of PPIs were analysed. Implant failure was defined as the removal of a dental implant for any reason. A total of 20,274 patients who received a total of 50,333 dental implants over a 12-year period were included. At the patient level, omeprazole users exhibited 1.77 (95% CI: 1.30 to 2.42) odds of experiencing implant loss compared with non-users. The use of PPIs was significantly associated with implant loss, with PPI users demonstrating 1.40 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.88) odds of implant failure. At the implant level, implants placed in pantoprazole users showed a significant protection against implant loss, while implants in omeprazole users demonstrated a significantly lower survival time compared with those in non-users. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that implants placed in omeprazole users exhibited a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.96) compared with those placed in non-users. Within the limitations of this study, omeprazole was significantly associated with implant failure both at a patient and implant level. At patient level, PPI users demonstrated a significantly higher risk of dental implant failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there any relation between proton pump inhibitors and risk of dental implant failure? A large-scale retrospective study using the BigMouth repository.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios S Chatzopoulos, Larry F Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this retrospective large-scale study was to investigate long-term the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and risk of dental implant failure. This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients rehabilitated with dental implants in the dental clinics of the universities that contribute data to the BigMouth network. Patients' characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, race, tobacco use, systemic medical conditions, and intake of PPIs were analysed. Implant failure was defined as the removal of a dental implant for any reason. A total of 20,274 patients who received a total of 50,333 dental implants over a 12-year period were included. At the patient level, omeprazole users exhibited 1.77 (95% CI: 1.30 to 2.42) odds of experiencing implant loss compared with non-users. The use of PPIs was significantly associated with implant loss, with PPI users demonstrating 1.40 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.88) odds of implant failure. At the implant level, implants placed in pantoprazole users showed a significant protection against implant loss, while implants in omeprazole users demonstrated a significantly lower survival time compared with those in non-users. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that implants placed in omeprazole users exhibited a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.96) compared with those placed in non-users. Within the limitations of this study, omeprazole was significantly associated with implant failure both at a patient and implant level. At patient level, PPI users demonstrated a significantly higher risk of dental implant failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.01.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项大规模回顾性研究旨在长期调查质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与牙科植入失败风险之间的关系。这是一项回顾性分析,研究对象是向 BigMouth 网络提供数据的大学牙科诊所中接受牙科植入物修复的一组患者。分析了患者的特征,包括年龄、性别、民族、种族、吸烟情况、全身性疾病和 PPIs 摄入量。种植失败的定义是因任何原因而拔除牙科种植体。研究共纳入了 20274 名患者,他们在 12 年间共接受了 50333 次牙科植入手术。在患者层面,与未使用奥美拉唑的患者相比,使用奥美拉唑的患者出现种植体脱落的几率为 1.77(95% CI:1.30 至 2.42)。使用 PPIs 与种植体脱落有显著相关性,PPI 使用者出现种植体脱落的几率为 1.40(95% CI:1.04 至 1.88)。在植入物层面,泮托拉唑使用者植入的植入物可显著防止植入物脱落,而奥美拉唑使用者植入的植入物存活时间明显低于非使用者。Cox 回归分析表明,与未使用奥美拉唑者相比,使用奥美拉唑者植入假体的危险比(HR:1.45,95% CI:1.07 至 1.96)明显更高。在本研究的局限性范围内,奥美拉唑在患者和种植体两个层面上都与种植失败有显著关联。在患者层面,PPI 使用者种植牙失败的风险明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is there any relation between proton pump inhibitors and risk of dental implant failure? A large-scale retrospective study using the BigMouth repository.

The aim of this retrospective large-scale study was to investigate long-term the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and risk of dental implant failure. This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients rehabilitated with dental implants in the dental clinics of the universities that contribute data to the BigMouth network. Patients' characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, race, tobacco use, systemic medical conditions, and intake of PPIs were analysed. Implant failure was defined as the removal of a dental implant for any reason. A total of 20,274 patients who received a total of 50,333 dental implants over a 12-year period were included. At the patient level, omeprazole users exhibited 1.77 (95% CI: 1.30 to 2.42) odds of experiencing implant loss compared with non-users. The use of PPIs was significantly associated with implant loss, with PPI users demonstrating 1.40 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.88) odds of implant failure. At the implant level, implants placed in pantoprazole users showed a significant protection against implant loss, while implants in omeprazole users demonstrated a significantly lower survival time compared with those in non-users. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that implants placed in omeprazole users exhibited a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.96) compared with those placed in non-users. Within the limitations of this study, omeprazole was significantly associated with implant failure both at a patient and implant level. At patient level, PPI users demonstrated a significantly higher risk of dental implant failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Navigating treatment ambiguities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of equivocal PET-CT findings and decision-making strategies following primary non-surgical treatment. Comment on "Clinical effectiveness of polynucleotide TMJ injection compared with physiotherapy: A 3-month randomised clinical trial". In reply to the comment on "Clinical effectiveness of polynucleotides TMJ injections compared to physiotherapy. A 3-month randomised clinical trial". Editorial Board Training and learning resources available for singly-qualified dental graduates entering into junior oral and maxillofacial surgery roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1