前列腺细胞外囊泡和临床意义前列腺癌的预后生物标志物:一项前瞻性单机构试点研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Prostate Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1002/pros.24861
Cameron J Britton, Jack R Andrews, Ali Arafa, Yohan Kim, Laureano Rangel Latuche, Phillip J Schulte, Vidhu B Joshi, Mohamed E Ahmed, R Jeffrey Karnes, Fabrice Lucien
{"title":"前列腺细胞外囊泡和临床意义前列腺癌的预后生物标志物:一项前瞻性单机构试点研究。","authors":"Cameron J Britton, Jack R Andrews, Ali Arafa, Yohan Kim, Laureano Rangel Latuche, Phillip J Schulte, Vidhu B Joshi, Mohamed E Ahmed, R Jeffrey Karnes, Fabrice Lucien","doi":"10.1002/pros.24861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Commercial biomarkers and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have been utilized to triage men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and determine patients most likely to harbor clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We studied combinations of mpMRI, PSA-based and novel extracellular vesicle (EV)-based biomarkers to determine the optimal pre-biopsy testing to predict csPCa at biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men presenting with elevated PSA (≥ 2 ng/mL) were prospectively enrolled and all men underwent clinically indicated mpMRI and blinded study blood draws to determine PSA, prostate health index (PHI) scoring, and EV serum levels. MRI-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy was performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. Bootstrapping analysis was performed to provide more accurate assessment of predictive abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 175 consecutive men were prospectively enrolled. Median age in the study population was 65 years. Combinations of biomarkers and MRI demonstrated better predictive ability for csPCa on biopsy than individual modalities. Predictive ability was greatest for PHI density (PHID)-mpMRI with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) while combinations of PSA density -mpMRI (AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73-0.89) and STEAP1-mpMRI (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86) demonstrated similar ability to predict csPCa. The study is limited by small, predominantly white patient cohort and requires external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inclusion of prostate density with biomarkers increases prognostic ability for detecting csPCa. EV density can refine prediction of csPCa and in combination with PHID-mpMRI leads to superior specificity, thereby decreasing unnecessary biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"594-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Extracellular Vesicles and Prognostic Biomarkers of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Institution Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron J Britton, Jack R Andrews, Ali Arafa, Yohan Kim, Laureano Rangel Latuche, Phillip J Schulte, Vidhu B Joshi, Mohamed E Ahmed, R Jeffrey Karnes, Fabrice Lucien\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.24861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Commercial biomarkers and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have been utilized to triage men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and determine patients most likely to harbor clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We studied combinations of mpMRI, PSA-based and novel extracellular vesicle (EV)-based biomarkers to determine the optimal pre-biopsy testing to predict csPCa at biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men presenting with elevated PSA (≥ 2 ng/mL) were prospectively enrolled and all men underwent clinically indicated mpMRI and blinded study blood draws to determine PSA, prostate health index (PHI) scoring, and EV serum levels. MRI-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy was performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. Bootstrapping analysis was performed to provide more accurate assessment of predictive abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 175 consecutive men were prospectively enrolled. Median age in the study population was 65 years. Combinations of biomarkers and MRI demonstrated better predictive ability for csPCa on biopsy than individual modalities. Predictive ability was greatest for PHI density (PHID)-mpMRI with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) while combinations of PSA density -mpMRI (AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73-0.89) and STEAP1-mpMRI (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86) demonstrated similar ability to predict csPCa. The study is limited by small, predominantly white patient cohort and requires external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inclusion of prostate density with biomarkers increases prognostic ability for detecting csPCa. EV density can refine prediction of csPCa and in combination with PHID-mpMRI leads to superior specificity, thereby decreasing unnecessary biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"594-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24861\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:商业生物标志物和多参数MRI (mpMRI)已被用于鉴别前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高的男性,并确定最有可能患有临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的患者。我们研究了mpMRI、psa和新型细胞外囊泡(EV)生物标志物的组合,以确定活检前预测csPCa的最佳检测方法。方法:前瞻性纳入PSA升高(≥2 ng/mL)的男性,所有男性均接受临床指示的mpMRI和盲法研究抽血,以确定PSA、前列腺健康指数(PHI)评分和EV血清水平。所有患者均行mri融合经会阴前列腺活检。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值,构建受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。进行自举分析以提供更准确的预测能力评估。结果:最终,175名连续男性被纳入前瞻性研究。研究人群的中位年龄为65岁。生物标志物和MRI的结合表明活检对csPCa的预测能力比单独的方式更好。PHI密度(PHID)-mpMRI的预测能力最强,AUC为0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92),而PSA密度-mpMRI的组合(AUC: 0.81;95% CI: 0.73-0.89)和STEAP1-mpMRI (AUC: 0.77;95% CI: 0.70-0.86)显示出类似的预测csPCa的能力。该研究受限于以白人为主的小型患者队列,需要外部验证。结论:前列腺密度与生物标志物的结合提高了检测csPCa的预后能力。EV密度可以改善csPCa的预测,并与PHID-mpMRI相结合,具有更高的特异性,从而减少不必要的活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prostate Extracellular Vesicles and Prognostic Biomarkers of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Institution Pilot Study.

Background: Commercial biomarkers and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have been utilized to triage men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and determine patients most likely to harbor clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We studied combinations of mpMRI, PSA-based and novel extracellular vesicle (EV)-based biomarkers to determine the optimal pre-biopsy testing to predict csPCa at biopsy.

Methods: Men presenting with elevated PSA (≥ 2 ng/mL) were prospectively enrolled and all men underwent clinically indicated mpMRI and blinded study blood draws to determine PSA, prostate health index (PHI) scoring, and EV serum levels. MRI-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy was performed in all patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. Bootstrapping analysis was performed to provide more accurate assessment of predictive abilities.

Results: Ultimately, 175 consecutive men were prospectively enrolled. Median age in the study population was 65 years. Combinations of biomarkers and MRI demonstrated better predictive ability for csPCa on biopsy than individual modalities. Predictive ability was greatest for PHI density (PHID)-mpMRI with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) while combinations of PSA density -mpMRI (AUC: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73-0.89) and STEAP1-mpMRI (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86) demonstrated similar ability to predict csPCa. The study is limited by small, predominantly white patient cohort and requires external validation.

Conclusions: Inclusion of prostate density with biomarkers increases prognostic ability for detecting csPCa. EV density can refine prediction of csPCa and in combination with PHID-mpMRI leads to superior specificity, thereby decreasing unnecessary biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
期刊最新文献
Incremental Predictive Value of the Oncotype Genomic Prostate Score for Adverse Pathology in Active Surveillance Candidates. Effect of Marital Status on Years of Life Lost From Metastatic Prostate Cancer According to Race/Ethnicity. Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Pathological Upgrading in Men With Biopsy Gleason 3 + 3 Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-Based Study. Evaluation of Loss of the Y Chromosome in Peripheral Blood as a Biomarker for Prostate Cancer. Treatment Response and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients Carrying the Germline MMS22L F722fs Mutation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1