使用双变量probit模型的剂量发现研究中药效-毒性反应的最佳设计

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109848
Belmiro P.M. Duarte , Anthony C. Atkinson
{"title":"使用双变量probit模型的剂量发现研究中药效-毒性反应的最佳设计","authors":"Belmiro P.M. Duarte ,&nbsp;Anthony C. Atkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phase I clinical trials are the first-in-human studies that primarily focus on the safety profile of drugs. Traditionally, the primary aim of a phase I clinical trial is to establish the maximum tolerated dose and characterize the toxicity profile of the tested agents. As a secondary aim, some phase I studies also include studies to obtain preliminary efficacy information about the experimental agents. In our research, we consider the optimal design of experiments in extended phase I clinical trials where both efficacy and toxicity are measured and the maximum tolerated dose has been established. We represent the response of both outcomes using a bivariate probit model for correlated responses and propose systematic numerical approaches based on Semidefinite Programming to address the problem. We construct locally optimal experimental designs for the following situations: (i) responses with efficacy and toxicity strongly correlated versus non-correlated, by varying the correlation parameter; (ii) <em>a priori</em> known correlation versus unknown correlation; (iii) unconstrained versus constrained designs, where the constraints represent safety limits, budget constraints and probability bounds; (iv) single versus combined drugs. Additionally, we consider four distinct optimality criteria: D–, A–, E–, and K–optimality. Our methodologies are extensively tested, and we demonstrate the optimality of the designs using equivalence theorems. To enrich our analysis, an equivalence theorem for the K–optimality criterion is derived.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 109848"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal designs for efficacy-toxicity response in dose finding studies using the bivariate probit model\",\"authors\":\"Belmiro P.M. Duarte ,&nbsp;Anthony C. Atkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Phase I clinical trials are the first-in-human studies that primarily focus on the safety profile of drugs. Traditionally, the primary aim of a phase I clinical trial is to establish the maximum tolerated dose and characterize the toxicity profile of the tested agents. As a secondary aim, some phase I studies also include studies to obtain preliminary efficacy information about the experimental agents. In our research, we consider the optimal design of experiments in extended phase I clinical trials where both efficacy and toxicity are measured and the maximum tolerated dose has been established. We represent the response of both outcomes using a bivariate probit model for correlated responses and propose systematic numerical approaches based on Semidefinite Programming to address the problem. We construct locally optimal experimental designs for the following situations: (i) responses with efficacy and toxicity strongly correlated versus non-correlated, by varying the correlation parameter; (ii) <em>a priori</em> known correlation versus unknown correlation; (iii) unconstrained versus constrained designs, where the constraints represent safety limits, budget constraints and probability bounds; (iv) single versus combined drugs. Additionally, we consider four distinct optimality criteria: D–, A–, E–, and K–optimality. Our methodologies are extensively tested, and we demonstrate the optimality of the designs using equivalence theorems. To enrich our analysis, an equivalence theorem for the K–optimality criterion is derived.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525001982\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525001982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

I期临床试验是第一次人体研究,主要关注药物的安全性。传统上,一期临床试验的主要目的是确定最大耐受剂量并确定被试药物的毒性特征。作为次要目的,一些I期研究还包括获得实验药物的初步功效信息的研究。在我们的研究中,我们考虑在延长的I期临床试验中实验的最佳设计,其中测量了疗效和毒性,并确定了最大耐受剂量。我们使用相关响应的二元概率模型来表示两种结果的响应,并提出基于半定规划的系统数值方法来解决这个问题。我们针对以下情况构建了局部最优的实验设计:(i)通过改变相关参数,药效和毒性反应是强相关的还是不相关的;(ii)先验的已知相关与未知相关;(iii)无约束与约束设计,其中约束代表安全限制、预算约束和概率界限;(iv)单药与联合用药。此外,我们考虑四种不同的最优性标准:D -, A -, E -和k -最优性。我们的方法经过了广泛的测试,我们使用等效定理证明了设计的最优性。为了丰富我们的分析,我们导出了k -最优性准则的等价定理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal designs for efficacy-toxicity response in dose finding studies using the bivariate probit model
Phase I clinical trials are the first-in-human studies that primarily focus on the safety profile of drugs. Traditionally, the primary aim of a phase I clinical trial is to establish the maximum tolerated dose and characterize the toxicity profile of the tested agents. As a secondary aim, some phase I studies also include studies to obtain preliminary efficacy information about the experimental agents. In our research, we consider the optimal design of experiments in extended phase I clinical trials where both efficacy and toxicity are measured and the maximum tolerated dose has been established. We represent the response of both outcomes using a bivariate probit model for correlated responses and propose systematic numerical approaches based on Semidefinite Programming to address the problem. We construct locally optimal experimental designs for the following situations: (i) responses with efficacy and toxicity strongly correlated versus non-correlated, by varying the correlation parameter; (ii) a priori known correlation versus unknown correlation; (iii) unconstrained versus constrained designs, where the constraints represent safety limits, budget constraints and probability bounds; (iv) single versus combined drugs. Additionally, we consider four distinct optimality criteria: D–, A–, E–, and K–optimality. Our methodologies are extensively tested, and we demonstrate the optimality of the designs using equivalence theorems. To enrich our analysis, an equivalence theorem for the K–optimality criterion is derived.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Toward digital twin-enabled venous flow modelling: Interactive valve geometry and lab-on-chip generation framework Prediction of tumor control probability in prostate cancer radiotherapy using a biophysical model incorporating cancer stem cell and hypoxia A multiscale modeling approach to study the role of mechanics and inflammation in the pathophysiology of articular cartilage Comparative analysis of traditional and deep learning time series architectures for influenza A infectious disease forecasting Policy optimization for multi-variant COVID-19 pandemic under unequal isolation and booster shot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1