影响全科医生对老年人开处方决定的因素,对虚弱的洞察:希腊初级保健的定性研究。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s40266-025-01188-3
Alexandros Paraskevopoulos, Björn Wettermark, Ioanna Tsiligianni
{"title":"影响全科医生对老年人开处方决定的因素,对虚弱的洞察:希腊初级保健的定性研究。","authors":"Alexandros Paraskevopoulos, Björn Wettermark, Ioanna Tsiligianni","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01188-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polypharmacy is increasing among older individuals worldwide. Deprescribing has been suggested as a strategy to reduce polypharmacy, but it has had a limited impact.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the facilitators and barriers to deprescribing in older adults, as perceived by primary care general practitioners, focusing particularly on factors influencing deprescribing in frail individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was employed and semistructured interviews were conducted between 9 April and 29 May 2024 with a sample of 30 general practitioners working in primary care facilities in Crete, Greece. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed on the basis of the Theoretical Domains Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several barriers to deprescribing were revealed, including a lack of expertise and motivation, inadequate communication skills, time constraints, and negative beliefs toward deprescribing held by physicians and patients. The lack of an established role for general practitioners in primary care, the absence of a national initiative targeting polypharmacy, and the influence of pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives were highlighted as challenges. The identified facilitators included the incorporation of deprescribing recommendations and considerations for frail patients into guidelines, fostering a strong doctor-patient relationship, promoting shared decision-making, facilitating effective collaboration with caregivers, and utilizing nonpharmacological therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>General practitioners encounter both barriers and facilitators when making deprescribing decisions for older adults, particularly those with frailty syndrome. Researchers and policymakers can use the findings of this research to guide future interventions and promote successful deprescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"339-352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing General Practitioners' Deprescribing Decisions for Older Adults, with Insights into Frailty: a Qualitative Study in Greek Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandros Paraskevopoulos, Björn Wettermark, Ioanna Tsiligianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40266-025-01188-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polypharmacy is increasing among older individuals worldwide. Deprescribing has been suggested as a strategy to reduce polypharmacy, but it has had a limited impact.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the facilitators and barriers to deprescribing in older adults, as perceived by primary care general practitioners, focusing particularly on factors influencing deprescribing in frail individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was employed and semistructured interviews were conducted between 9 April and 29 May 2024 with a sample of 30 general practitioners working in primary care facilities in Crete, Greece. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed on the basis of the Theoretical Domains Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several barriers to deprescribing were revealed, including a lack of expertise and motivation, inadequate communication skills, time constraints, and negative beliefs toward deprescribing held by physicians and patients. The lack of an established role for general practitioners in primary care, the absence of a national initiative targeting polypharmacy, and the influence of pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives were highlighted as challenges. The identified facilitators included the incorporation of deprescribing recommendations and considerations for frail patients into guidelines, fostering a strong doctor-patient relationship, promoting shared decision-making, facilitating effective collaboration with caregivers, and utilizing nonpharmacological therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>General practitioners encounter both barriers and facilitators when making deprescribing decisions for older adults, particularly those with frailty syndrome. Researchers and policymakers can use the findings of this research to guide future interventions and promote successful deprescribing practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"339-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003592/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01188-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01188-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在世界范围内,老年人服用多种药物的情况正在增加。减少处方已被建议作为一种策略,以减少多药,但它的影响有限。目的:本研究调查了初级保健全科医生认为的老年人开处方的促进因素和障碍,特别关注影响体弱个体开处方的因素。方法:采用定性方法,并于2024年4月9日至5月29日对30名在希腊克里特岛初级保健机构工作的全科医生进行了半结构化访谈。采访被逐字记录下来。在理论领域框架的基础上进行主题分析。结果:揭示了一些障碍,包括缺乏专业知识和动机,沟通技巧不足,时间限制,以及医生和患者对处方的负面看法。这些挑战包括全科医生在初级保健方面缺乏既定的作用,缺乏针对多种药物的国家倡议,以及药剂师和制药代表的影响。确定的促进因素包括将对虚弱患者的处方建议和考虑纳入指南,培养牢固的医患关系,促进共同决策,促进与护理人员的有效合作,以及利用非药物治疗。结论:全科医生在为老年人,特别是那些患有虚弱综合征的老年人做出处方决定时,遇到了障碍和便利因素。研究人员和政策制定者可以利用这项研究的结果来指导未来的干预措施,并促进成功的处方实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Influencing General Practitioners' Deprescribing Decisions for Older Adults, with Insights into Frailty: a Qualitative Study in Greek Primary Care.

Introduction: Polypharmacy is increasing among older individuals worldwide. Deprescribing has been suggested as a strategy to reduce polypharmacy, but it has had a limited impact.

Objective: This study investigated the facilitators and barriers to deprescribing in older adults, as perceived by primary care general practitioners, focusing particularly on factors influencing deprescribing in frail individuals.

Methods: A qualitative approach was employed and semistructured interviews were conducted between 9 April and 29 May 2024 with a sample of 30 general practitioners working in primary care facilities in Crete, Greece. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed on the basis of the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results: Several barriers to deprescribing were revealed, including a lack of expertise and motivation, inadequate communication skills, time constraints, and negative beliefs toward deprescribing held by physicians and patients. The lack of an established role for general practitioners in primary care, the absence of a national initiative targeting polypharmacy, and the influence of pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives were highlighted as challenges. The identified facilitators included the incorporation of deprescribing recommendations and considerations for frail patients into guidelines, fostering a strong doctor-patient relationship, promoting shared decision-making, facilitating effective collaboration with caregivers, and utilizing nonpharmacological therapy.

Conclusions: General practitioners encounter both barriers and facilitators when making deprescribing decisions for older adults, particularly those with frailty syndrome. Researchers and policymakers can use the findings of this research to guide future interventions and promote successful deprescribing practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Frail Older Adults with Overactive Bladder. Attitudes Toward Deprescribing Among Community-Dwelling Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Community Pharmacies. Longitudinal Non-interventional Changes of the FORTA Score are Associated with Changes of Cognitive and Physical Function Tests in Community-Dwelling Older People. Potentially Inappropriate Prescription and Its Association with Index Hospitalization: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study Using TIME Criteria. Harms of Continued Antihypertensives: An Overview of Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1