在食管癌新辅助治疗中偶然使用血管紧张素系统抑制剂:生存分析。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.02.012
Abraham Geller MD , Eric Abston MD, PhD , Ashok Muniappan MD , Christina Costantino MD , Hexiao Tang MD, PhD , Michael Lanuti MD
{"title":"在食管癌新辅助治疗中偶然使用血管紧张素系统抑制剂:生存分析。","authors":"Abraham Geller MD ,&nbsp;Eric Abston MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ashok Muniappan MD ,&nbsp;Christina Costantino MD ,&nbsp;Hexiao Tang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Lanuti MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system signaling affects tumorigenesis and treatment susceptibility of various cancers. We investigate the impact of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in patients treated for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving trimodal therapy from 2002 to 2017 at a single institution were abstracted. Primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival, analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method, Cox regression, and propensity score–matched analysis. Secondary outcomes included pathologic complete response and tumor regression grade.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 375 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were included; 92 patients (25%) were angiotensin system inhibitor users, and 283 patients (75%) were angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. Median follow-up was 32.4 months. Compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers, angiotensin system inhibitor users were older (mean age, 62 vs 64 years) and had higher rates of comorbidities (<em>P</em> &lt; .05 for all). Distribution of tumor stages was similar between groups (<em>P</em> = .3). Compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed improved median overall survival (30 vs 59 months, <em>P</em> = .025) and disease-free survival (18 vs 26 months, <em>P</em> = .032). After controlling for age and comorbidities, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.633, <em>P</em> = .031) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.661, <em>P</em> = .036) compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. Among 182 propensity score–matched patients, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed greater median overall survival (59 vs 26 months, <em>P</em> = .025) and disease-free survival (25 vs 13 months, <em>P</em> = .030) than angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. The hazard ratio was 0.623 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.410-0.946, <em>P</em> = .027) and 0.651 for disease-free survival (95% CI, 0.440-0.961, <em>P</em> = .031), both favoring angiotensin system inhibitor users. No differences between groups were identified with respect to secondary outcomes (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition during esophageal cancer treatment is associated with improved outcomes. Our study suggests that angiotensin system inhibitors may provide additional survival benefits in the multi-modality treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"170 2","pages":"Pages 379-388.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental use of angiotensin system inhibitors during neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma: An analysis of survival\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Geller MD ,&nbsp;Eric Abston MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ashok Muniappan MD ,&nbsp;Christina Costantino MD ,&nbsp;Hexiao Tang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Lanuti MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.02.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system signaling affects tumorigenesis and treatment susceptibility of various cancers. We investigate the impact of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in patients treated for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving trimodal therapy from 2002 to 2017 at a single institution were abstracted. Primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival, analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method, Cox regression, and propensity score–matched analysis. Secondary outcomes included pathologic complete response and tumor regression grade.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 375 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were included; 92 patients (25%) were angiotensin system inhibitor users, and 283 patients (75%) were angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. Median follow-up was 32.4 months. Compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers, angiotensin system inhibitor users were older (mean age, 62 vs 64 years) and had higher rates of comorbidities (<em>P</em> &lt; .05 for all). Distribution of tumor stages was similar between groups (<em>P</em> = .3). Compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed improved median overall survival (30 vs 59 months, <em>P</em> = .025) and disease-free survival (18 vs 26 months, <em>P</em> = .032). After controlling for age and comorbidities, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.633, <em>P</em> = .031) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.661, <em>P</em> = .036) compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. Among 182 propensity score–matched patients, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed greater median overall survival (59 vs 26 months, <em>P</em> = .025) and disease-free survival (25 vs 13 months, <em>P</em> = .030) than angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. The hazard ratio was 0.623 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.410-0.946, <em>P</em> = .027) and 0.651 for disease-free survival (95% CI, 0.440-0.961, <em>P</em> = .031), both favoring angiotensin system inhibitor users. No differences between groups were identified with respect to secondary outcomes (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition during esophageal cancer treatment is associated with improved outcomes. Our study suggests that angiotensin system inhibitors may provide additional survival benefits in the multi-modality treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"170 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 379-388.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522325001217\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522325001217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肾素-血管紧张素醛固酮系统(RAAS)信号通路影响多种肿瘤的发生和治疗易感性。我们研究了血管紧张素系统抑制剂(ASI)对局部晚期食管腺癌(EAC)患者生存的影响。方法:选取2002 - 2017年在同一医院接受三模式治疗的EAC患者。主要结局为总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),采用Kaplan-Meier方法、Cox回归和倾向评分匹配分析进行分析。次要结局包括病理完全缓解和肿瘤消退等级。结果:纳入375例EAC患者。92例患者(25%)为ASI使用者(ASI+);283例患者(75%)未使用ASI (ASI-)。中位随访时间为32.4个月。与ASI-相比,ASI+患者年龄更大(平均年龄62岁比64岁),合并症发生率更高(P-, ASI+显示改善的中位OS(30个月比59个月,P= 0.025)和DFS(18个月比26个月,P= 0.032)。在控制年龄和合并症后,与ASI-相比,ASI+的OS (HR .633, P= 0.031)和DFS (HR .661, P= 0.036)均有改善。在182例倾向评分匹配的患者中,ASI+的中位OS(59个月vs 26个月,P= 0.025)和DFS(25个月vs 13个月,P= 0.030)均高于ASI-。OS的HR为0.623 (95%CI为0.410 -)。946, P= 0.027), DFS为0.651 (95%CI为0.440 -。961, P= 0.031),均支持ASI+。在次要结局方面,组间无差异(P < 0.05)。结论:食管癌治疗过程中RAAS抑制与预后改善相关。我们的研究表明,ASIs可能在EAC的多模式治疗中提供额外的生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidental use of angiotensin system inhibitors during neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma: An analysis of survival

Objective

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system signaling affects tumorigenesis and treatment susceptibility of various cancers. We investigate the impact of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in patients treated for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving trimodal therapy from 2002 to 2017 at a single institution were abstracted. Primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival, analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method, Cox regression, and propensity score–matched analysis. Secondary outcomes included pathologic complete response and tumor regression grade.

Results

A total of 375 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were included; 92 patients (25%) were angiotensin system inhibitor users, and 283 patients (75%) were angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. Median follow-up was 32.4 months. Compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers, angiotensin system inhibitor users were older (mean age, 62 vs 64 years) and had higher rates of comorbidities (P < .05 for all). Distribution of tumor stages was similar between groups (P = .3). Compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed improved median overall survival (30 vs 59 months, P = .025) and disease-free survival (18 vs 26 months, P = .032). After controlling for age and comorbidities, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.633, P = .031) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.661, P = .036) compared with angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. Among 182 propensity score–matched patients, angiotensin system inhibitor users showed greater median overall survival (59 vs 26 months, P = .025) and disease-free survival (25 vs 13 months, P = .030) than angiotensin system inhibitor nonusers. The hazard ratio was 0.623 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.410-0.946, P = .027) and 0.651 for disease-free survival (95% CI, 0.440-0.961, P = .031), both favoring angiotensin system inhibitor users. No differences between groups were identified with respect to secondary outcomes (P > .05).

Conclusions

Angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition during esophageal cancer treatment is associated with improved outcomes. Our study suggests that angiotensin system inhibitors may provide additional survival benefits in the multi-modality treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Interpretable artificial intelligence to predict preoperative risk factors for failure to rescue after coronary artery bypass grafting Outcomes among patients bridged to heart transplant with microaxial flow versus durable left ventricular assist device support Early promise, enduring questions: Endovascular repair for type A aortic dissection continues to seek stronger evidence Stroke after aortic arch surgery with short circulatory arrest times: The role of cerebral perfusion strategies Safety risks of intratracheal lipid nanoparticle gene delivery to the lung and potential mitigation strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1