{"title":"组织动力学如何影响护士从业人员的决策纬度、社会支持、工作自我认同和工作不安全感","authors":"Isabella Wright, Anja Vorster, Eamon Merrick","doi":"10.1111/jan.16842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To identify whether nurse practitioners (NPs) in New Zealand (NZ) have the organisational opportunities to make decisions related to performing their role.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study of self-reported decision-making, social support, psychosocial demands and identification with role in a representative population of NPs employed in a range of practice settings in NZ.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study utilised the internationally validated Job Content Questionnaire. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using co-efficient α and confirmatory factor analysis. Linear regression analyses were conducted to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between the constructs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal reliability. Factor analysis supported a five-factor model, with <i>decision latitude, psychological job demands, co-worker support, supervisor support</i> and <i>job insecurity</i> as the main factors fitting the theoretical model. Regression models suggested that NPs (<i>n</i> = 169) have more control over their decision-making when supported by their colleagues rather than supervisors. NPs perceive improved relationships with healthcare consumers if they feel an increase in support from their colleagues; this relationship is mediated by the freedom to make decisions. NPs in rural settings had more job security when they felt valued and appreciated at work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The presence of collegial support significantly influences the freedom and autonomy of NPs in making decisions. Workforce policy, the organisation of practice and vocational training may be effective ways of helping NPs expand access to healthcare services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession and Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>Collegial and supervisory support are critical for NPs to work to their full scope. A funded, first-year-in-practice vocational training program designed to support role transition, foster collegial support and build a community of practice for newly qualified NPs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>For the first time, nurse practitioner decision-making and autonomy determinants have been described in NZ. These findings should be considered within the context of international evidence and in global nursing workforce policies that seek to create opportunities for NPs to work to the limit of their scope.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines—STROBE checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 12","pages":"8704-8713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Organisational Dynamics Impact Decision Latitude, Social Support, Self-Identity Through Work and Job Insecurity for Nurse Practitioners\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Wright, Anja Vorster, Eamon Merrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify whether nurse practitioners (NPs) in New Zealand (NZ) have the organisational opportunities to make decisions related to performing their role.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study of self-reported decision-making, social support, psychosocial demands and identification with role in a representative population of NPs employed in a range of practice settings in NZ.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study utilised the internationally validated Job Content Questionnaire. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using co-efficient α and confirmatory factor analysis. Linear regression analyses were conducted to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between the constructs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal reliability. Factor analysis supported a five-factor model, with <i>decision latitude, psychological job demands, co-worker support, supervisor support</i> and <i>job insecurity</i> as the main factors fitting the theoretical model. Regression models suggested that NPs (<i>n</i> = 169) have more control over their decision-making when supported by their colleagues rather than supervisors. NPs perceive improved relationships with healthcare consumers if they feel an increase in support from their colleagues; this relationship is mediated by the freedom to make decisions. NPs in rural settings had more job security when they felt valued and appreciated at work.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The presence of collegial support significantly influences the freedom and autonomy of NPs in making decisions. Workforce policy, the organisation of practice and vocational training may be effective ways of helping NPs expand access to healthcare services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for the Profession and Patient Care</h3>\\n \\n <p>Collegial and supervisory support are critical for NPs to work to their full scope. A funded, first-year-in-practice vocational training program designed to support role transition, foster collegial support and build a community of practice for newly qualified NPs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Impact</h3>\\n \\n <p>For the first time, nurse practitioner decision-making and autonomy determinants have been described in NZ. These findings should be considered within the context of international evidence and in global nursing workforce policies that seek to create opportunities for NPs to work to the limit of their scope.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines—STROBE checklist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>No patient or public contribution.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"8704-8713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16842\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Organisational Dynamics Impact Decision Latitude, Social Support, Self-Identity Through Work and Job Insecurity for Nurse Practitioners
Aim
To identify whether nurse practitioners (NPs) in New Zealand (NZ) have the organisational opportunities to make decisions related to performing their role.
Design
A cross-sectional study of self-reported decision-making, social support, psychosocial demands and identification with role in a representative population of NPs employed in a range of practice settings in NZ.
Methods
This study utilised the internationally validated Job Content Questionnaire. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using co-efficient α and confirmatory factor analysis. Linear regression analyses were conducted to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between the constructs.
Results
All scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal reliability. Factor analysis supported a five-factor model, with decision latitude, psychological job demands, co-worker support, supervisor support and job insecurity as the main factors fitting the theoretical model. Regression models suggested that NPs (n = 169) have more control over their decision-making when supported by their colleagues rather than supervisors. NPs perceive improved relationships with healthcare consumers if they feel an increase in support from their colleagues; this relationship is mediated by the freedom to make decisions. NPs in rural settings had more job security when they felt valued and appreciated at work.
Conclusion
The presence of collegial support significantly influences the freedom and autonomy of NPs in making decisions. Workforce policy, the organisation of practice and vocational training may be effective ways of helping NPs expand access to healthcare services.
Implications for the Profession and Patient Care
Collegial and supervisory support are critical for NPs to work to their full scope. A funded, first-year-in-practice vocational training program designed to support role transition, foster collegial support and build a community of practice for newly qualified NPs.
Impact
For the first time, nurse practitioner decision-making and autonomy determinants have been described in NZ. These findings should be considered within the context of international evidence and in global nursing workforce policies that seek to create opportunities for NPs to work to the limit of their scope.
Reporting Method
The authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines—STROBE checklist.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.