{"title":"综合医疗服务背景下的患者住院护理体验:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Beibei Xiong, Daniel X. Bailey, Christine Stirling, Ziyinyue Zeng, Emmy Trinh, Melinda Martin-Khan","doi":"10.1111/jan.16826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the care experiences of patients with chronic conditions in hospitals and identify areas for improvement in the context of comprehensive care delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A sequential explanatory mixed-method study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study includes a cross-sectional survey (<i>n</i> = 311) and semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 43) with patients with chronic conditions who attended an Australian hospital. Quantitative data were analysed using RStudio and presented using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Survey responses were categorised into themes aligned with interview findings and qualitative insights were used to contextualise and explain quantitative results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the care experience of patients with chronic conditions in hospitals was positive, but there was room for improvement. Ten themes were identified where improvement was needed, including patient inclusion in shared decision-making, patients' needs and care coordination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Various gaps in care were identified that affected patients' hospital experiences. Many of these gaps are amenable to change, highlighting significant opportunities for improving patient hospital experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Healthcare professionals should make more efforts to involve patients in shared decision-making, work collaboratively, address both the medical and psychological needs of patients and provide them with guidance and information.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>The findings revealed the patient's hospital experiences in the context of comprehensive care delivery and identified areas requiring improvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>The CROSS and The COREQ guidelines were followed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The study protocol was presented to stakeholders from two hospitals in Australia, a Patient and Carer Advisory Board and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and discussions were held to assess the relevance and significance of this study to clinical practice and health policy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What Does This Paper Contribute?</h3>\n \n <p>This research offers valuable feedback on patients' care experiences in hospital settings following the implementation of the national Comprehensive Care Standard, providing insights into gaps in care and informing global efforts to enhance patient-centred comprehensive care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"81 10","pages":"6907-6923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16826","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Experiences of Hospital Care in the Context of Comprehensive Care Delivery: A Mixed Method Study\",\"authors\":\"Beibei Xiong, Daniel X. Bailey, Christine Stirling, Ziyinyue Zeng, Emmy Trinh, Melinda Martin-Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the care experiences of patients with chronic conditions in hospitals and identify areas for improvement in the context of comprehensive care delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sequential explanatory mixed-method study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study includes a cross-sectional survey (<i>n</i> = 311) and semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 43) with patients with chronic conditions who attended an Australian hospital. Quantitative data were analysed using RStudio and presented using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Survey responses were categorised into themes aligned with interview findings and qualitative insights were used to contextualise and explain quantitative results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, the care experience of patients with chronic conditions in hospitals was positive, but there was room for improvement. Ten themes were identified where improvement was needed, including patient inclusion in shared decision-making, patients' needs and care coordination.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Various gaps in care were identified that affected patients' hospital experiences. Many of these gaps are amenable to change, highlighting significant opportunities for improving patient hospital experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Healthcare professionals should make more efforts to involve patients in shared decision-making, work collaboratively, address both the medical and psychological needs of patients and provide them with guidance and information.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Impact</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings revealed the patient's hospital experiences in the context of comprehensive care delivery and identified areas requiring improvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CROSS and The COREQ guidelines were followed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study protocol was presented to stakeholders from two hospitals in Australia, a Patient and Carer Advisory Board and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and discussions were held to assess the relevance and significance of this study to clinical practice and health policy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What Does This Paper Contribute?</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research offers valuable feedback on patients' care experiences in hospital settings following the implementation of the national Comprehensive Care Standard, providing insights into gaps in care and informing global efforts to enhance patient-centred comprehensive care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"81 10\",\"pages\":\"6907-6923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jan.16826\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Experiences of Hospital Care in the Context of Comprehensive Care Delivery: A Mixed Method Study
Aims
To explore the care experiences of patients with chronic conditions in hospitals and identify areas for improvement in the context of comprehensive care delivery.
Design
A sequential explanatory mixed-method study.
Methods
The study includes a cross-sectional survey (n = 311) and semi-structured interviews (n = 43) with patients with chronic conditions who attended an Australian hospital. Quantitative data were analysed using RStudio and presented using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Survey responses were categorised into themes aligned with interview findings and qualitative insights were used to contextualise and explain quantitative results.
Results
Overall, the care experience of patients with chronic conditions in hospitals was positive, but there was room for improvement. Ten themes were identified where improvement was needed, including patient inclusion in shared decision-making, patients' needs and care coordination.
Conclusion
Various gaps in care were identified that affected patients' hospital experiences. Many of these gaps are amenable to change, highlighting significant opportunities for improving patient hospital experiences.
Implications
Healthcare professionals should make more efforts to involve patients in shared decision-making, work collaboratively, address both the medical and psychological needs of patients and provide them with guidance and information.
Impact
The findings revealed the patient's hospital experiences in the context of comprehensive care delivery and identified areas requiring improvement.
Reporting Method
The CROSS and The COREQ guidelines were followed.
Patient or Public Contribution
The study protocol was presented to stakeholders from two hospitals in Australia, a Patient and Carer Advisory Board and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and discussions were held to assess the relevance and significance of this study to clinical practice and health policy.
What Does This Paper Contribute?
This research offers valuable feedback on patients' care experiences in hospital settings following the implementation of the national Comprehensive Care Standard, providing insights into gaps in care and informing global efforts to enhance patient-centred comprehensive care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.