物联网红外折射窗口干燥机干燥木瓜皮质量评估的先进建模方法

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Food Process Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/jfpe.70059
Harsh Dadhaneeya, Prabhat K. Nema, Sophia Chanu Warepam
{"title":"物联网红外折射窗口干燥机干燥木瓜皮质量评估的先进建模方法","authors":"Harsh Dadhaneeya,&nbsp;Prabhat K. Nema,&nbsp;Sophia Chanu Warepam","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this research is the comprehensive comparison of advanced modeling tools for predicting the quality parameters of IoT-enabled IR-assisted RW-dried papaya leather. The models used in the current research were “response surface methodology (RSM),” “artificial neural network (ANN),” “machine learning regression algorithms (MLRA),” and “adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).” This comprehensive compression could be differentiated based on the model's fitness and prediction capabilities. The fitness of the model was assessed using statistical metrics such as “root mean square error (RMSE),” “mean square error (MAE),” and “coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>).” While the prediction capability was evaluated by using tactics like predicting error, predicting accuracy, chi-square, and associated <i>p</i>-values. The results indicated that both the RSM and MLRA models had substantial predictive capabilities and achieved a prediction accuracy of 98.992 and 97.169, respectively. This study concluded that the model's fitness was getting excellent in the Alpha ANN (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9943) and ANFIS (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9903) models. However, when evaluating the prediction capabilities, the RSM and MLRA models outperformed the others.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Modeling Approaches for Quality Assessment of Papaya Leather Dried in IoT-Enabled IR-Assisted Refractance Window Dryer\",\"authors\":\"Harsh Dadhaneeya,&nbsp;Prabhat K. Nema,&nbsp;Sophia Chanu Warepam\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfpe.70059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this research is the comprehensive comparison of advanced modeling tools for predicting the quality parameters of IoT-enabled IR-assisted RW-dried papaya leather. The models used in the current research were “response surface methodology (RSM),” “artificial neural network (ANN),” “machine learning regression algorithms (MLRA),” and “adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).” This comprehensive compression could be differentiated based on the model's fitness and prediction capabilities. The fitness of the model was assessed using statistical metrics such as “root mean square error (RMSE),” “mean square error (MAE),” and “coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>).” While the prediction capability was evaluated by using tactics like predicting error, predicting accuracy, chi-square, and associated <i>p</i>-values. The results indicated that both the RSM and MLRA models had substantial predictive capabilities and achieved a prediction accuracy of 98.992 and 97.169, respectively. This study concluded that the model's fitness was getting excellent in the Alpha ANN (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9943) and ANFIS (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9903) models. However, when evaluating the prediction capabilities, the RSM and MLRA models outperformed the others.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Process Engineering\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Process Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advanced Modeling Approaches for Quality Assessment of Papaya Leather Dried in IoT-Enabled IR-Assisted Refractance Window Dryer

The aim of this research is the comprehensive comparison of advanced modeling tools for predicting the quality parameters of IoT-enabled IR-assisted RW-dried papaya leather. The models used in the current research were “response surface methodology (RSM),” “artificial neural network (ANN),” “machine learning regression algorithms (MLRA),” and “adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).” This comprehensive compression could be differentiated based on the model's fitness and prediction capabilities. The fitness of the model was assessed using statistical metrics such as “root mean square error (RMSE),” “mean square error (MAE),” and “coefficient of determination (R2).” While the prediction capability was evaluated by using tactics like predicting error, predicting accuracy, chi-square, and associated p-values. The results indicated that both the RSM and MLRA models had substantial predictive capabilities and achieved a prediction accuracy of 98.992 and 97.169, respectively. This study concluded that the model's fitness was getting excellent in the Alpha ANN (R2 = 0.9943) and ANFIS (R2 = 0.9903) models. However, when evaluating the prediction capabilities, the RSM and MLRA models outperformed the others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Neural Network Techniques and Multi-Linear Regression to Predict Properties and Classify Pepper Seeds Food Processing Innovations are a Powerful Enabler of the Future of Food, Making a Compelling Case for Entrepreneurship and Collaboration Between Industry and Academia to Ensure a Sustainable Future Research on the Contact Dynamics of Binary Non-Spherical Particles Based on Hertz Theory Modeling the Biphasic and Monophasic Microbial Growth in Pasteurized Cow Milk Under Isothermal Temperature Abuse Competitiveness of Vacuum Steam Thawing in Four Typical Novel Thawing Methods: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1