胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与 2 型糖尿病老年患者的抑郁风险 :目标试验模拟研究

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-01347
Huilin Tang, Ying Lu, William T Donahoo, Sarah C Westen, Yong Chen, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与 2 型糖尿病老年患者的抑郁风险 :目标试验模拟研究","authors":"Huilin Tang, Ying Lu, William T Donahoo, Sarah C Westen, Yong Chen, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-01347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown potential antidepressant effects, population studies yield inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk for depression in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating treatment with GLP-1RAs versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Target trial emulation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. National Medicare administrative data from January 2014 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults aged 66 years or older with T2D initiating treatment with a GLP-1RA were matched 1:1 on propensity score with those initiating treatment with either an SGLT2i or a DPP4i.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary end point was incident depression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI within matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 665 matched pairs of older adults were included in the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus SGLT2is; the rate difference of depression between GLP-1RA users and SGLT2i users was 3.48 (95% CI, -0.81 to 7.78) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 1.07 (CI, 0.98 to 1.18). In the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus DPP4is (13 711 matched pairs), the rate difference was -5.78 (CI, -10.49 to -1.07) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 0.90 (CI, 0.82 to 0.98).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Unmeasured confounders (such as hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> levels and body mass index), outcome misclassification, and limited generalizability to all GLP-1RA users (for example, younger populations or those without T2D receiving the drug for obesity treatment).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among older adults with T2D, the incidence of depression was relatively low. Use of GLP-1RAs was associated with a modestly lower risk for depression compared with use of DPP4is, but not SGLT2is.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Huilin Tang, Ying Lu, William T Donahoo, Sarah C Westen, Yong Chen, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-01347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown potential antidepressant effects, population studies yield inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk for depression in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating treatment with GLP-1RAs versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Target trial emulation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. National Medicare administrative data from January 2014 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults aged 66 years or older with T2D initiating treatment with a GLP-1RA were matched 1:1 on propensity score with those initiating treatment with either an SGLT2i or a DPP4i.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary end point was incident depression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI within matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 665 matched pairs of older adults were included in the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus SGLT2is; the rate difference of depression between GLP-1RA users and SGLT2i users was 3.48 (95% CI, -0.81 to 7.78) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 1.07 (CI, 0.98 to 1.18). In the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus DPP4is (13 711 matched pairs), the rate difference was -5.78 (CI, -10.49 to -1.07) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 0.90 (CI, 0.82 to 0.98).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Unmeasured confounders (such as hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> levels and body mass index), outcome misclassification, and limited generalizability to all GLP-1RA users (for example, younger populations or those without T2D receiving the drug for obesity treatment).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among older adults with T2D, the incidence of depression was relatively low. Use of GLP-1RAs was associated with a modestly lower risk for depression compared with use of DPP4is, but not SGLT2is.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01347\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Background: Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown potential antidepressant effects, population studies yield inconsistent results.

Objective: To compare the risk for depression in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating treatment with GLP-1RAs versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is).

Design: Target trial emulation study.

Setting: U.S. National Medicare administrative data from January 2014 to December 2020.

Patients: Adults aged 66 years or older with T2D initiating treatment with a GLP-1RA were matched 1:1 on propensity score with those initiating treatment with either an SGLT2i or a DPP4i.

Measurements: The primary end point was incident depression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI within matched groups.

Results: A total of 14 665 matched pairs of older adults were included in the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus SGLT2is; the rate difference of depression between GLP-1RA users and SGLT2i users was 3.48 (95% CI, -0.81 to 7.78) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 1.07 (CI, 0.98 to 1.18). In the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus DPP4is (13 711 matched pairs), the rate difference was -5.78 (CI, -10.49 to -1.07) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 0.90 (CI, 0.82 to 0.98).

Limitation: Unmeasured confounders (such as hemoglobin A1c levels and body mass index), outcome misclassification, and limited generalizability to all GLP-1RA users (for example, younger populations or those without T2D receiving the drug for obesity treatment).

Conclusion: Among older adults with T2D, the incidence of depression was relatively low. Use of GLP-1RAs was associated with a modestly lower risk for depression compared with use of DPP4is, but not SGLT2is.

Primary funding source: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Annals Graphic Medicine - Firsthand Experiences and Reflections of the Wards. Comparing the Health of Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries: Risk Scores Versus Reality. Development of Prompt Templates for Large Language Model-Driven Screening in Systematic Reviews. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study. Large Language Models for Screening Search Results in Systematic Reviews: Are We There Yet?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1