评估机器人手术胃癌治疗的作用:机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)和欧洲联合会国际消化外科学会(EFISDS)联合工作组的综合综述。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.3390/curroncol32020083
Luigi Marano, Tomasz Cwalinski, Sergii Girnyi, Jaroslaw Skokowski, Aman Goyal, Silvia Malerba, Francesco Paolo Prete, Piotr Mocarski, Magdalena Kamila Kania, Maciej Świerblewski, Marek Strzemski, Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón, Johnn Henry Herrera Kok, Karol Polom, Witold Kycler, Valentin Calu, Pasquale Talento, Antonio Brillantino, Francesco Antonio Ciarleglio, Luigi Brusciano, Nicola Cillara, Ruslan Duka, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Natale Calomino, Mario Testini, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Yogesh Vashist
{"title":"评估机器人手术胃癌治疗的作用:机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)和欧洲联合会国际消化外科学会(EFISDS)联合工作组的综合综述。","authors":"Luigi Marano, Tomasz Cwalinski, Sergii Girnyi, Jaroslaw Skokowski, Aman Goyal, Silvia Malerba, Francesco Paolo Prete, Piotr Mocarski, Magdalena Kamila Kania, Maciej Świerblewski, Marek Strzemski, Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón, Johnn Henry Herrera Kok, Karol Polom, Witold Kycler, Valentin Calu, Pasquale Talento, Antonio Brillantino, Francesco Antonio Ciarleglio, Luigi Brusciano, Nicola Cillara, Ruslan Duka, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Natale Calomino, Mario Testini, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Yogesh Vashist","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32020083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) represents a significant advancement in the surgical management of gastric cancer, offering superior dexterity, enhanced visualization, and improved ergonomics compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). This review systematically evaluates the current evidence on perioperative outcomes, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and economic considerations, providing insights into RAMIG's potential role in modern gastric cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough analysis of retrospective, prospective, and meta-analytic studies was conducted to compare RAMIG with LG. Key outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node retrieval, postoperative complications, learning curve duration, and cost-effectiveness, were assessed. Emphasis was placed on both short-term and long-term oncological outcomes to determine the clinical value of RAMIG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence indicates that RAMIG is associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity rates, and a shorter learning curve, with proficiency achieved after 11-25 cases compared to 40-60 cases for LG. The robotic platform's articulated instruments and enhanced three-dimensional visualization enable more precise lymphadenectomy, particularly in complex anatomical regions. Despite these advantages, operative time remains longer, and costs remain higher due to system acquisition, maintenance, and consumable expenses. However, emerging data suggest a gradual narrowing of cost disparities. While short-term outcomes are favorable, further high-quality, multicenter studies are needed to validate long-term oncological efficacy and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAMIG offers significant technical and clinical advantages over conventional LG, particularly in terms of precision and learning efficiency. However, the long-term oncological benefits and economic feasibility require further validation. Future research should focus on cost optimization, advanced technological integration such as near-infrared fluorescence and artificial intelligence, and multicenter trials to solidify RAMIG's role as a standard approach for gastric cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Role of Robotic Surgery Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review by the Robotic Global Surgical Society (TROGSS) and European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery (EFISDS) Joint Working Group.\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Marano, Tomasz Cwalinski, Sergii Girnyi, Jaroslaw Skokowski, Aman Goyal, Silvia Malerba, Francesco Paolo Prete, Piotr Mocarski, Magdalena Kamila Kania, Maciej Świerblewski, Marek Strzemski, Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón, Johnn Henry Herrera Kok, Karol Polom, Witold Kycler, Valentin Calu, Pasquale Talento, Antonio Brillantino, Francesco Antonio Ciarleglio, Luigi Brusciano, Nicola Cillara, Ruslan Duka, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Natale Calomino, Mario Testini, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J Oviedo, Yogesh Vashist\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32020083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) represents a significant advancement in the surgical management of gastric cancer, offering superior dexterity, enhanced visualization, and improved ergonomics compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). This review systematically evaluates the current evidence on perioperative outcomes, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and economic considerations, providing insights into RAMIG's potential role in modern gastric cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough analysis of retrospective, prospective, and meta-analytic studies was conducted to compare RAMIG with LG. Key outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node retrieval, postoperative complications, learning curve duration, and cost-effectiveness, were assessed. Emphasis was placed on both short-term and long-term oncological outcomes to determine the clinical value of RAMIG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence indicates that RAMIG is associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity rates, and a shorter learning curve, with proficiency achieved after 11-25 cases compared to 40-60 cases for LG. The robotic platform's articulated instruments and enhanced three-dimensional visualization enable more precise lymphadenectomy, particularly in complex anatomical regions. Despite these advantages, operative time remains longer, and costs remain higher due to system acquisition, maintenance, and consumable expenses. However, emerging data suggest a gradual narrowing of cost disparities. While short-term outcomes are favorable, further high-quality, multicenter studies are needed to validate long-term oncological efficacy and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAMIG offers significant technical and clinical advantages over conventional LG, particularly in terms of precision and learning efficiency. However, the long-term oncological benefits and economic feasibility require further validation. Future research should focus on cost optimization, advanced technological integration such as near-infrared fluorescence and artificial intelligence, and multicenter trials to solidify RAMIG's role as a standard approach for gastric cancer surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020083\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人辅助微创胃切除术(RAMIG)代表了胃癌手术管理的重大进步,与腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)相比,它提供了优越的灵活性,增强的可视化和改进的人体工程学。本综述系统地评估了目前关于围手术期预后、肿瘤疗效、学习曲线和经济考虑的证据,为RAMIG在现代胃癌手术中的潜在作用提供了见解。方法:通过回顾性、前瞻性和荟萃分析研究对RAMIG和LG进行比较。评估主要结果,包括手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结回收、术后并发症、学习曲线持续时间和成本-效果。重点放在短期和长期肿瘤预后来确定RAMIG的临床价值。结果:有证据表明RAMIG与术中出血量减少、发病率降低和学习曲线缩短相关,11-25例患者达到熟练程度,而LG为40-60例。机器人平台的铰接式仪器和增强的三维可视化可以实现更精确的淋巴结切除术,特别是在复杂的解剖区域。尽管有这些优势,但由于系统获取、维护和消耗性费用,操作时间更长,成本更高。然而,新出现的数据表明,成本差距正在逐渐缩小。虽然短期结果是有利的,但需要进一步的高质量、多中心研究来验证长期肿瘤疗效和生存结果。结论:RAMIG与传统的LG相比,具有显著的技术和临床优势,特别是在准确性和学习效率方面。然而,长期的肿瘤效益和经济可行性需要进一步验证。未来的研究应侧重于成本优化、近红外荧光和人工智能等先进技术整合以及多中心试验,以巩固RAMIG作为胃癌手术标准方法的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Role of Robotic Surgery Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review by the Robotic Global Surgical Society (TROGSS) and European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery (EFISDS) Joint Working Group.

Introduction: Robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) represents a significant advancement in the surgical management of gastric cancer, offering superior dexterity, enhanced visualization, and improved ergonomics compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). This review systematically evaluates the current evidence on perioperative outcomes, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and economic considerations, providing insights into RAMIG's potential role in modern gastric cancer surgery.

Methods: A thorough analysis of retrospective, prospective, and meta-analytic studies was conducted to compare RAMIG with LG. Key outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node retrieval, postoperative complications, learning curve duration, and cost-effectiveness, were assessed. Emphasis was placed on both short-term and long-term oncological outcomes to determine the clinical value of RAMIG.

Results: Evidence indicates that RAMIG is associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity rates, and a shorter learning curve, with proficiency achieved after 11-25 cases compared to 40-60 cases for LG. The robotic platform's articulated instruments and enhanced three-dimensional visualization enable more precise lymphadenectomy, particularly in complex anatomical regions. Despite these advantages, operative time remains longer, and costs remain higher due to system acquisition, maintenance, and consumable expenses. However, emerging data suggest a gradual narrowing of cost disparities. While short-term outcomes are favorable, further high-quality, multicenter studies are needed to validate long-term oncological efficacy and survival outcomes.

Conclusion: RAMIG offers significant technical and clinical advantages over conventional LG, particularly in terms of precision and learning efficiency. However, the long-term oncological benefits and economic feasibility require further validation. Future research should focus on cost optimization, advanced technological integration such as near-infrared fluorescence and artificial intelligence, and multicenter trials to solidify RAMIG's role as a standard approach for gastric cancer surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Management of Facial Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Vitiligo with Topical Ruxolitinib: Quantitative Assessment Using a Semi-Automatic Tool. Family Relationships as Modifiable Targets for Caregiver Quality of Life in Hospice Care: A Multicenter Study. Optimizing the Efficacy-Toxicity Paradigm in Pediatric Oncology: A Narrative Review of Immunotherapy and Survivorship Outcomes. Early Neurological Improvement and Ambulation Recovery After Delayed Surgery in Surgically Selected Nonambulatory Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Factors Associated with Autopsy Consent in Pediatric Oncology: A 10-Year Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1