Lasse Mausehund, Anri Patron, Sami Äyrämö, Tron Krosshaug
{"title":"切割技术的聚类分析-评估前交叉韧带损伤风险的一种有价值的方法?","authors":"Lasse Mausehund, Anri Patron, Sami Äyrämö, Tron Krosshaug","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive efforts to pinpoint singular biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, research findings are still inconclusive. By combining multiple biomechanical variables, cluster analyses could help us identify safe and risky cutting technique strategies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify common movement strategies during cutting maneuvers and to assess their association with ACL injury risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 754 female elite handball and football players, including 59 with a history of ACL injury, performed a sport-specific cutting task while 3D biomechanics were recorded. Over an 8-year follow-up period, 43 of these players sustained a primary ACL injury and 13 players a secondary ACL injury. Cutting technique was described using 36 discrete kinematic variables. To identify different cutting techniques, we employed a K-means clustering algorithm on data subsets involving different numbers of kinematic variables (36, 13 and 5 variables) and different sports (handball, football, and both combined). To assess the impact of the identified cutting technique clusters on ACL injury risk, we compared the proportion of injured players between these clusters using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test and adjusted rand indices (ARI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two distinguishable cutting technique clusters in the subset involving both sports and five kinematics variables (average silhouette score, ASS = 0.35). However, these clusters were formed based on sport- or task-related differences (Fisher's <i>p</i> < 0.001, ARI = 0.83) rather than injury-related differences (Fisher's <i>p</i> = 0.417, ARI = 0.00). We also found two cutting technique clusters in the handball (ASS = 0.23) and football (ASS = 0.30) subsets with five kinematic variables. However, none of these clusters appeared to be associated with ACL injury risk (Fisher's <i>p</i> > 0.05, ARI = 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No safe or risky cutting technique strategies could be discerned among female elite handball and football players. Cluster analysis of cutting technique, using a K-means algorithm, did not prove to be a valuable approach for assessing ACL injury risk in this dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1463272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cluster analysis of cutting technique-a valuable approach for assessing anterior cruciate ligament injury risk?\",\"authors\":\"Lasse Mausehund, Anri Patron, Sami Äyrämö, Tron Krosshaug\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive efforts to pinpoint singular biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, research findings are still inconclusive. By combining multiple biomechanical variables, cluster analyses could help us identify safe and risky cutting technique strategies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify common movement strategies during cutting maneuvers and to assess their association with ACL injury risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 754 female elite handball and football players, including 59 with a history of ACL injury, performed a sport-specific cutting task while 3D biomechanics were recorded. Over an 8-year follow-up period, 43 of these players sustained a primary ACL injury and 13 players a secondary ACL injury. Cutting technique was described using 36 discrete kinematic variables. To identify different cutting techniques, we employed a K-means clustering algorithm on data subsets involving different numbers of kinematic variables (36, 13 and 5 variables) and different sports (handball, football, and both combined). To assess the impact of the identified cutting technique clusters on ACL injury risk, we compared the proportion of injured players between these clusters using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test and adjusted rand indices (ARI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two distinguishable cutting technique clusters in the subset involving both sports and five kinematics variables (average silhouette score, ASS = 0.35). However, these clusters were formed based on sport- or task-related differences (Fisher's <i>p</i> < 0.001, ARI = 0.83) rather than injury-related differences (Fisher's <i>p</i> = 0.417, ARI = 0.00). We also found two cutting technique clusters in the handball (ASS = 0.23) and football (ASS = 0.30) subsets with five kinematic variables. However, none of these clusters appeared to be associated with ACL injury risk (Fisher's <i>p</i> > 0.05, ARI = 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No safe or risky cutting technique strategies could be discerned among female elite handball and football players. Cluster analysis of cutting technique, using a K-means algorithm, did not prove to be a valuable approach for assessing ACL injury risk in this dataset.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1463272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管广泛的努力查明单一生物力学危险因素的前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤,研究结果仍然没有定论。通过结合多个生物力学变量,聚类分析可以帮助我们确定安全和有风险的切割技术策略。目的:确定切割动作中常见的运动策略,并评估其与前交叉韧带损伤风险的关系。方法:对754名女性优秀手球和足球运动员(其中59名有前交叉韧带损伤史)进行运动特异性切割任务,同时记录三维生物力学。在8年的随访期间,43名球员遭受了原发性ACL损伤,13名球员遭受了继发性ACL损伤。用36个离散的运动学变量描述了切削工艺。为了识别不同的切割技术,我们对涉及不同数量的运动学变量(36、13和5个变量)和不同运动(手球、足球和两者结合)的数据子集采用了K-means聚类算法。为了评估确定的切割技术集群对ACL损伤风险的影响,我们使用Fisher-Freeman-Halton精确检验和调整后的兰德指数(ARI)比较了这些集群之间受伤球员的比例。结果:我们在涉及运动和五个运动学变量的子集中确定了两个可区分的切割技术集群(平均轮廓评分,ASS = 0.35)。然而,这些聚类是基于运动或任务相关差异形成的(Fisher’sp = 0.417, ARI = 0.00)。我们还发现两个切割技术集群在手球(ASS = 0.23)和足球(ASS = 0.30)子集与五个运动学变量。然而,这些聚类似乎与ACL损伤风险无关(Fisher’s p < 0.05, ARI = 0.00)。结论:在女子优秀手球和足球运动员中不存在安全或危险的切球技术策略。在该数据集中,使用K-means算法的切割技术聚类分析并未被证明是评估ACL损伤风险的有价值的方法。
Cluster analysis of cutting technique-a valuable approach for assessing anterior cruciate ligament injury risk?
Background: Despite extensive efforts to pinpoint singular biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, research findings are still inconclusive. By combining multiple biomechanical variables, cluster analyses could help us identify safe and risky cutting technique strategies.
Purpose: To identify common movement strategies during cutting maneuvers and to assess their association with ACL injury risk.
Methods: A total of 754 female elite handball and football players, including 59 with a history of ACL injury, performed a sport-specific cutting task while 3D biomechanics were recorded. Over an 8-year follow-up period, 43 of these players sustained a primary ACL injury and 13 players a secondary ACL injury. Cutting technique was described using 36 discrete kinematic variables. To identify different cutting techniques, we employed a K-means clustering algorithm on data subsets involving different numbers of kinematic variables (36, 13 and 5 variables) and different sports (handball, football, and both combined). To assess the impact of the identified cutting technique clusters on ACL injury risk, we compared the proportion of injured players between these clusters using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test and adjusted rand indices (ARI).
Results: We identified two distinguishable cutting technique clusters in the subset involving both sports and five kinematics variables (average silhouette score, ASS = 0.35). However, these clusters were formed based on sport- or task-related differences (Fisher's p < 0.001, ARI = 0.83) rather than injury-related differences (Fisher's p = 0.417, ARI = 0.00). We also found two cutting technique clusters in the handball (ASS = 0.23) and football (ASS = 0.30) subsets with five kinematic variables. However, none of these clusters appeared to be associated with ACL injury risk (Fisher's p > 0.05, ARI = 0.00).
Conclusion: No safe or risky cutting technique strategies could be discerned among female elite handball and football players. Cluster analysis of cutting technique, using a K-means algorithm, did not prove to be a valuable approach for assessing ACL injury risk in this dataset.