想象一下疼痛联盟和面向退伍军人的阿片类药物营销的可能性:给军队和退伍军人医疗保健的教训。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13040434
Christopher K Haddock, Luther Elliott, Andrew Kolodny, Christopher M Kaipust, Walker S C Poston, Jennifer D Oliva, Eleanor T Lewis, Elizabeth M Oliva, Nattinee Jitnarin, Chunki Fong
{"title":"想象一下疼痛联盟和面向退伍军人的阿片类药物营销的可能性:给军队和退伍军人医疗保健的教训。","authors":"Christopher K Haddock, Luther Elliott, Andrew Kolodny, Christopher M Kaipust, Walker S C Poston, Jennifer D Oliva, Eleanor T Lewis, Elizabeth M Oliva, Nattinee Jitnarin, Chunki Fong","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The opioid crisis has disproportionately impacted U.S. military veterans, who face heightened risks of opioid use disorder and overdose due to chronic pain and mental health conditions. The pharmaceutical industry's role in misrepresenting opioid risks-leading to over USD 50 billion in legal settlements-has included targeted marketing to vulnerable populations. This study examines Janssen Pharmaceuticals' \"Imagine the Possibilities Pain Coalition\" (IPPC), which aimed to increase opioid use among veterans with chronic non-cancer pain. Insights from this public health industry document analysis offer guidance for military medicine and healthcare policymaking. <b>Methods</b>: Using the Opioid Industry Document Archive (OIDA), housed at Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, San Francisco, researchers conducted retrospective content analysis. Documents referencing veterans were identified through keyword searches on Johns Hopkins' SciServer portal and reviewed using CoCounsel, an AI-based legal document platform <i>using a human-in-the-loop</i> approach. Relevant documents were examined by the authors to extract material aligned with the research focus. <b>Results</b>: The IPPC employed strategies to influence opioid prescribing for veterans. These included educational materials that minimized addiction risks and exaggerated long-term benefits and empathy-driven narratives prioritizing immediate pain relief over potential harms. Ghostwriting ensured favorable perspectives on opioids in scientific literature, aligning with broader industry strategies to promote opioids for chronic pain. <b>Conclusions</b>: The targeted marketing of opioids to veterans has exacerbated the opioid crisis, as documented in government reports and litigation. Rigorous oversight of industry-funded coalitions and evidence-based practices are critical to insulating military healthcare from corporate influence and addressing the opioid crisis among veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Imagine the Possibilities Pain Coalition</i> and Opioid Marketing to Veterans: Lessons for Military and Veterans Healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher K Haddock, Luther Elliott, Andrew Kolodny, Christopher M Kaipust, Walker S C Poston, Jennifer D Oliva, Eleanor T Lewis, Elizabeth M Oliva, Nattinee Jitnarin, Chunki Fong\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13040434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The opioid crisis has disproportionately impacted U.S. military veterans, who face heightened risks of opioid use disorder and overdose due to chronic pain and mental health conditions. The pharmaceutical industry's role in misrepresenting opioid risks-leading to over USD 50 billion in legal settlements-has included targeted marketing to vulnerable populations. This study examines Janssen Pharmaceuticals' \\\"Imagine the Possibilities Pain Coalition\\\" (IPPC), which aimed to increase opioid use among veterans with chronic non-cancer pain. Insights from this public health industry document analysis offer guidance for military medicine and healthcare policymaking. <b>Methods</b>: Using the Opioid Industry Document Archive (OIDA), housed at Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, San Francisco, researchers conducted retrospective content analysis. Documents referencing veterans were identified through keyword searches on Johns Hopkins' SciServer portal and reviewed using CoCounsel, an AI-based legal document platform <i>using a human-in-the-loop</i> approach. Relevant documents were examined by the authors to extract material aligned with the research focus. <b>Results</b>: The IPPC employed strategies to influence opioid prescribing for veterans. These included educational materials that minimized addiction risks and exaggerated long-term benefits and empathy-driven narratives prioritizing immediate pain relief over potential harms. Ghostwriting ensured favorable perspectives on opioids in scientific literature, aligning with broader industry strategies to promote opioids for chronic pain. <b>Conclusions</b>: The targeted marketing of opioids to veterans has exacerbated the opioid crisis, as documented in government reports and litigation. Rigorous oversight of industry-funded coalitions and evidence-based practices are critical to insulating military healthcare from corporate influence and addressing the opioid crisis among veterans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:阿片类药物危机对美国退伍军人造成了不成比例的影响,由于慢性疼痛和精神健康状况,他们面临着阿片类药物使用障碍和过量使用的高风险。制药行业在歪曲阿片类药物风险方面的作用——导致超过500亿美元的法律和解——包括针对弱势群体的定向营销。这项研究调查了杨森制药公司的“想象疼痛的可能性联盟”(IPPC),该联盟旨在增加患有慢性非癌症疼痛的退伍军人的阿片类药物使用。该公共卫生行业文件分析的见解为军事医学和卫生保健政策制定提供了指导。方法:研究人员利用约翰霍普金斯大学和加州大学旧金山分校阿片类药物行业文档档案馆(OIDA)进行回顾性内容分析。在约翰霍普金斯大学的SciServer门户网站上,通过关键词搜索识别涉及退伍军人的文件,并使用CoCounsel进行审查,CoCounsel是一个基于人工智能的法律文件平台,采用“人在循环”的方法。作者对相关文献进行了审查,以提取与研究重点一致的材料。结果:国际计划生育委员会采取了影响退伍军人阿片类药物处方的策略。其中包括最小化成瘾风险和夸大长期益处的教育材料,以及优先考虑立即缓解疼痛而不是潜在危害的移情驱动叙事。代写确保了阿片类药物在科学文献中的有利观点,与推广阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的更广泛行业战略保持一致。结论:正如政府报告和诉讼中所记载的那样,针对退伍军人的阿片类药物定向营销加剧了阿片类药物危机。严格监督行业资助的联盟和基于证据的做法,对于使军事医疗不受企业影响和解决退伍军人中的阿片类药物危机至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Imagine the Possibilities Pain Coalition and Opioid Marketing to Veterans: Lessons for Military and Veterans Healthcare.

Background/Objectives: The opioid crisis has disproportionately impacted U.S. military veterans, who face heightened risks of opioid use disorder and overdose due to chronic pain and mental health conditions. The pharmaceutical industry's role in misrepresenting opioid risks-leading to over USD 50 billion in legal settlements-has included targeted marketing to vulnerable populations. This study examines Janssen Pharmaceuticals' "Imagine the Possibilities Pain Coalition" (IPPC), which aimed to increase opioid use among veterans with chronic non-cancer pain. Insights from this public health industry document analysis offer guidance for military medicine and healthcare policymaking. Methods: Using the Opioid Industry Document Archive (OIDA), housed at Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, San Francisco, researchers conducted retrospective content analysis. Documents referencing veterans were identified through keyword searches on Johns Hopkins' SciServer portal and reviewed using CoCounsel, an AI-based legal document platform using a human-in-the-loop approach. Relevant documents were examined by the authors to extract material aligned with the research focus. Results: The IPPC employed strategies to influence opioid prescribing for veterans. These included educational materials that minimized addiction risks and exaggerated long-term benefits and empathy-driven narratives prioritizing immediate pain relief over potential harms. Ghostwriting ensured favorable perspectives on opioids in scientific literature, aligning with broader industry strategies to promote opioids for chronic pain. Conclusions: The targeted marketing of opioids to veterans has exacerbated the opioid crisis, as documented in government reports and litigation. Rigorous oversight of industry-funded coalitions and evidence-based practices are critical to insulating military healthcare from corporate influence and addressing the opioid crisis among veterans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
What's Happening in the Exam Room? A Mixed-Methods Study About the Provision of Patient-Centered Contraceptive Care for Baltimore Latine Patients. Condition-Specific Healthcare Expenditures for Treated Knee Injuries and Shoulder Disorders in the Post-Pandemic United States. Observed Versus Expected Use of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer in the Lazio Region (Italy): An Integrated Population-Based and Literature-Informed Framework for Healthcare Planning. Association Between Caries Risk and Public Water Fluoridation in Balsas, Maranhão: A Cross-Sectional Study. Developing Methods for Observing Awe Narration in Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1