CD34+造血干细胞计数在阿尔茨海默病中的meta分析

IF 3 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.3390/diseases13020025
Vinay Suresh, Malavika Rudrakumar, Anmol Kaur, Victor Ghosh, Poorvikha Satish, Amogh Verma, Priyanka Roy, Mainak Bardhan
{"title":"CD34+造血干细胞计数在阿尔茨海默病中的meta分析","authors":"Vinay Suresh, Malavika Rudrakumar, Anmol Kaur, Victor Ghosh, Poorvikha Satish, Amogh Verma, Priyanka Roy, Mainak Bardhan","doi":"10.3390/diseases13020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the presence and quantity of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) through a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the databases identified the observational and interventional studies reporting baseline CD34+ cell counts in AD patients. The data on mean counts and the measures of variation were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using common and random effects models to compare the CD34+ cell counts between the AD patients and controls. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using tau<sup>2</sup>, tau, and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the ROBINS-I tool.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Five studies were included, comprising four observational studies and one open-label trial, with a total of 271 participants (139 AD patients and 132 controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis indicated an increase in CD34+ cell counts of the AD patients when compared to the controls. The common effects model showed a moderate SMD of 0.2964 (95% CI:0.0490-0.5437). However, the random effects model yielded a non-significant SMD of 0.2326 (95% CI: -0.4832-0.9484). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 87.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AD patients may exhibit higher circulating CD34+ cell counts than the controls, but substantial heterogeneity and potential biases limit definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Counts in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Suresh, Malavika Rudrakumar, Anmol Kaur, Victor Ghosh, Poorvikha Satish, Amogh Verma, Priyanka Roy, Mainak Bardhan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases13020025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the presence and quantity of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) through a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the databases identified the observational and interventional studies reporting baseline CD34+ cell counts in AD patients. The data on mean counts and the measures of variation were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using common and random effects models to compare the CD34+ cell counts between the AD patients and controls. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using tau<sup>2</sup>, tau, and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the ROBINS-I tool.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Five studies were included, comprising four observational studies and one open-label trial, with a total of 271 participants (139 AD patients and 132 controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis indicated an increase in CD34+ cell counts of the AD patients when compared to the controls. The common effects model showed a moderate SMD of 0.2964 (95% CI:0.0490-0.5437). However, the random effects model yielded a non-significant SMD of 0.2326 (95% CI: -0.4832-0.9484). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 87.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AD patients may exhibit higher circulating CD34+ cell counts than the controls, but substantial heterogeneity and potential biases limit definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13020025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过荟萃分析评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者体内CD34+造血干细胞的存在和数量:对数据库进行系统检索,确定了报告AD患者CD34+细胞基线计数的观察性和干预性研究。提取了平均计数和变异度量的数据。使用共同效应和随机效应模型计算标准化均值差异(SMDs),以比较AD患者和对照组之间的CD34+细胞计数。使用tau2、tau和I2统计量评估研究之间的异质性。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险:共纳入了五项研究,包括四项观察性研究和一项开放标签试验,共有 271 人参与(139 名 AD 患者和 132 名对照组):荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,AD 患者的 CD34+ 细胞计数有所增加。共同效应模型显示,中度 SMD 为 0.2964(95% CI:0.0490-0.5437)。然而,随机效应模型得出的SMD为0.2326(95% CI:-0.4832-0.9484),并不显著。研究之间存在显著的异质性(I2 = 87.1%,P < 0.0001):AD患者的循环CD34+细胞计数可能高于对照组,但严重的异质性和潜在的偏倚限制了明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Counts in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: To assess the presence and quantity of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) through a meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic search of the databases identified the observational and interventional studies reporting baseline CD34+ cell counts in AD patients. The data on mean counts and the measures of variation were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using common and random effects models to compare the CD34+ cell counts between the AD patients and controls. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using tau2, tau, and I2 statistics. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the ROBINS-I tool.

Patients: Five studies were included, comprising four observational studies and one open-label trial, with a total of 271 participants (139 AD patients and 132 controls).

Results: The meta-analysis indicated an increase in CD34+ cell counts of the AD patients when compared to the controls. The common effects model showed a moderate SMD of 0.2964 (95% CI:0.0490-0.5437). However, the random effects model yielded a non-significant SMD of 0.2326 (95% CI: -0.4832-0.9484). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 87.1%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: AD patients may exhibit higher circulating CD34+ cell counts than the controls, but substantial heterogeneity and potential biases limit definitive conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy, Organ Preservation and Beyond: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Management. Preoperative Melatonin for Women Undergoing Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Alternative Therapeutic Approaches in the Management of Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review. Tailored Surgical Treatment and Outcomes in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Case Series of Five Consecutive Paradigmatic Cases. EVG-Based Periarterial/Perivenous Invasion (periA/V) as a High-Sensitivity Surrogate Marker for Lymph Node Metastasis in pT1 Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Special Type.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1