肝硬化伴明显血小板减少患者门诊选择性食管静脉曲张绑扎的疗效。

IF 3 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.3390/diseases13020027
Nisar Amin, Mark Ayoub, Julton Tomanguillo, Harleen Chela, Veysel Tahan, Ebubekir Daglilar
{"title":"肝硬化伴明显血小板减少患者门诊选择性食管静脉曲张绑扎的疗效。","authors":"Nisar Amin, Mark Ayoub, Julton Tomanguillo, Harleen Chela, Veysel Tahan, Ebubekir Daglilar","doi":"10.3390/diseases13020027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines advise against platelet transfusion prior to emergent esophageal variceal band ligation (EVL) in cirrhotic patients with platelet counts below 50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL. However, recommendations for elective EVL remain unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes of cirrhotic patients undergoing outpatient EVL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with cirrhosis, with or without significant thrombocytopenia (<50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL), were identified using the TriNetX database. Patients who received platelet transfusions within one week prior to or on the day of EVL were excluded. Cirrhotic patients with significant thrombocytopenia undergoing outpatient elective EVL were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those with platelet counts between 30 and 49 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL and (2) those with platelet counts ≥50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare rates of post-EVL esophageal variceal bleeding and 14-day mortality between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16,718 cirrhotic patients undergoing outpatient EVL were included in the analysis. Of these, 17.2% (n = 2874) had significant thrombocytopenia, while 82.8% (n = 13,844) had platelet counts ≥50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL. Two well-matched cohorts (2864 patients each) were created using 1:1 PSM. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding 14-day post-EVL esophageal variceal bleeding (13.7% vs. 15.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.12), 14-day mortality (5.7% vs. 5.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.28), and 28-day mortality (8.4% vs. 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elective EVL appears to be safe in cirrhotic patients with platelet counts as low as 30 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL, challenging the current threshold of 50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL for platelet transfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Outpatient Elective Esophageal Varices Band Ligation in Cirrhosis Patients with Significant Thrombocytopenia.\",\"authors\":\"Nisar Amin, Mark Ayoub, Julton Tomanguillo, Harleen Chela, Veysel Tahan, Ebubekir Daglilar\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diseases13020027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines advise against platelet transfusion prior to emergent esophageal variceal band ligation (EVL) in cirrhotic patients with platelet counts below 50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL. However, recommendations for elective EVL remain unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes of cirrhotic patients undergoing outpatient EVL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with cirrhosis, with or without significant thrombocytopenia (<50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL), were identified using the TriNetX database. Patients who received platelet transfusions within one week prior to or on the day of EVL were excluded. Cirrhotic patients with significant thrombocytopenia undergoing outpatient elective EVL were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those with platelet counts between 30 and 49 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL and (2) those with platelet counts ≥50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare rates of post-EVL esophageal variceal bleeding and 14-day mortality between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16,718 cirrhotic patients undergoing outpatient EVL were included in the analysis. Of these, 17.2% (n = 2874) had significant thrombocytopenia, while 82.8% (n = 13,844) had platelet counts ≥50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL. Two well-matched cohorts (2864 patients each) were created using 1:1 PSM. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding 14-day post-EVL esophageal variceal bleeding (13.7% vs. 15.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.12), 14-day mortality (5.7% vs. 5.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.28), and 28-day mortality (8.4% vs. 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elective EVL appears to be safe in cirrhotic patients with platelet counts as low as 30 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL, challenging the current threshold of 50 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL for platelet transfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13020027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13020027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的指南建议血小板计数低于50 × 103/μL的肝硬化患者在紧急食管静脉曲张束结扎(EVL)之前不要输注血小板。然而,对于选择性EVL的建议仍不明确。本研究评估接受门诊EVL治疗的肝硬化患者的预后。方法:使用TriNetX数据库对年龄在18岁及以上诊断为肝硬化,伴或不伴明显血小板减少(3/μL)的成年患者进行鉴定。排除EVL前一周或EVL当日接受血小板输注的患者。肝硬化明显血小板减少患者行门诊选择性EVL分为两组:(1)血小板计数在30 ~ 49 × 103/μL之间的患者和(2)血小板计数≥50 × 103/μL的患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较两个队列evl后食管静脉曲张出血率和14天死亡率。结果:共有16,718例接受门诊EVL的肝硬化患者被纳入分析。其中,17.2% (n = 2874)有明显的血小板减少症,82.8% (n = 13844)的血小板计数≥50 × 103/μL。两个匹配良好的队列(每个2864例患者)使用1:1的PSM创建。evl术后14天食道静脉曲张出血组间差异无统计学意义(13.7% vs 15.2%;P = 0.12), 14天死亡率(5.7% vs. 5.0%;P = 0.28), 28天死亡率(8.4% vs. 7.5%;P = 0.20)。结论:对于血小板计数低至30 × 103/μL的肝硬化患者,选择性EVL似乎是安全的,挑战了目前血小板输注50 × 103/μL的阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Outpatient Elective Esophageal Varices Band Ligation in Cirrhosis Patients with Significant Thrombocytopenia.

Background: Current guidelines advise against platelet transfusion prior to emergent esophageal variceal band ligation (EVL) in cirrhotic patients with platelet counts below 50 × 103/μL. However, recommendations for elective EVL remain unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes of cirrhotic patients undergoing outpatient EVL.

Methods: Adult patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with cirrhosis, with or without significant thrombocytopenia (<50 × 103/μL), were identified using the TriNetX database. Patients who received platelet transfusions within one week prior to or on the day of EVL were excluded. Cirrhotic patients with significant thrombocytopenia undergoing outpatient elective EVL were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those with platelet counts between 30 and 49 × 103/μL and (2) those with platelet counts ≥50 × 103/μL. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare rates of post-EVL esophageal variceal bleeding and 14-day mortality between the two cohorts.

Results: A total of 16,718 cirrhotic patients undergoing outpatient EVL were included in the analysis. Of these, 17.2% (n = 2874) had significant thrombocytopenia, while 82.8% (n = 13,844) had platelet counts ≥50 × 103/μL. Two well-matched cohorts (2864 patients each) were created using 1:1 PSM. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding 14-day post-EVL esophageal variceal bleeding (13.7% vs. 15.2%; p = 0.12), 14-day mortality (5.7% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.28), and 28-day mortality (8.4% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.20).

Conclusions: Elective EVL appears to be safe in cirrhotic patients with platelet counts as low as 30 × 103/μL, challenging the current threshold of 50 × 103/μL for platelet transfusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy, Organ Preservation and Beyond: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Management. Preoperative Melatonin for Women Undergoing Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Alternative Therapeutic Approaches in the Management of Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review. Tailored Surgical Treatment and Outcomes in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Case Series of Five Consecutive Paradigmatic Cases. EVG-Based Periarterial/Perivenous Invasion (periA/V) as a High-Sensitivity Surrogate Marker for Lymph Node Metastasis in pT1 Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Special Type.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1