Konstantinos Priftis, Daphne Gasparre, Denyse Carazzolo, Valeria Vaccaro, Roberta Toffano, Marco Pitteri, Massimo Grassi
{"title":"数字跨度和双音节非词跨度:意大利标准。","authors":"Konstantinos Priftis, Daphne Gasparre, Denyse Carazzolo, Valeria Vaccaro, Roberta Toffano, Marco Pitteri, Massimo Grassi","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We standardized a new version of the Digit span test and the first version of the Bisyllabic non-word span test, both measuring the phonological loop, in an Italian sample of neurologically healthy adults (n = 225). All stimuli were administered to the participants through a computerized procedure to avoid the influence of the examiner on participants' performance. We used a preliminary test to exclude the presence of sensory-perceptual and articulatory-motor difficulties that might have influenced the results. The results revealed that both Age and Education were significant predictors of participants' performance on the Digit span test. By contrast, only Age predicted significantly participants' performance on the Bisyllabic non-word span test. The average Digit span was approximately twice as large as the average Bisyllabic non-word span, suggesting that the latter might be a strategy-free measure of the phonological loop. The Bisyllabic non-word span is an innovative and specific measure for identifying phonological short-term memory deficits. For all tests, adjusted and equivalent scores are provided to facilitate results interpretation and clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digit span and Bisyllabic non-word span: Italian norms.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Priftis, Daphne Gasparre, Denyse Carazzolo, Valeria Vaccaro, Roberta Toffano, Marco Pitteri, Massimo Grassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnp.12420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We standardized a new version of the Digit span test and the first version of the Bisyllabic non-word span test, both measuring the phonological loop, in an Italian sample of neurologically healthy adults (n = 225). All stimuli were administered to the participants through a computerized procedure to avoid the influence of the examiner on participants' performance. We used a preliminary test to exclude the presence of sensory-perceptual and articulatory-motor difficulties that might have influenced the results. The results revealed that both Age and Education were significant predictors of participants' performance on the Digit span test. By contrast, only Age predicted significantly participants' performance on the Bisyllabic non-word span test. The average Digit span was approximately twice as large as the average Bisyllabic non-word span, suggesting that the latter might be a strategy-free measure of the phonological loop. The Bisyllabic non-word span is an innovative and specific measure for identifying phonological short-term memory deficits. For all tests, adjusted and equivalent scores are provided to facilitate results interpretation and clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digit span and Bisyllabic non-word span: Italian norms.
We standardized a new version of the Digit span test and the first version of the Bisyllabic non-word span test, both measuring the phonological loop, in an Italian sample of neurologically healthy adults (n = 225). All stimuli were administered to the participants through a computerized procedure to avoid the influence of the examiner on participants' performance. We used a preliminary test to exclude the presence of sensory-perceptual and articulatory-motor difficulties that might have influenced the results. The results revealed that both Age and Education were significant predictors of participants' performance on the Digit span test. By contrast, only Age predicted significantly participants' performance on the Bisyllabic non-word span test. The average Digit span was approximately twice as large as the average Bisyllabic non-word span, suggesting that the latter might be a strategy-free measure of the phonological loop. The Bisyllabic non-word span is an innovative and specific measure for identifying phonological short-term memory deficits. For all tests, adjusted and equivalent scores are provided to facilitate results interpretation and clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including:
• clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups
• behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes
• cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging
• multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science
The following types of paper are invited:
• papers reporting original empirical investigations
• theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data
• review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications
• brief reports and comments
• case reports
• fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors)
• special issues.