MC3T3-E1细胞在不同培养基中的遗传谱分析:对体外筛选发展的影响

IF 4.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biomedicines Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.3390/biomedicines13020489
Makoto Izumiya, Hidehiko Nobuoka, Hono Endo, Rintaro Ueno, Masaki Mimura, Naoto Saito, Hisao Haniu
{"title":"MC3T3-E1细胞在不同培养基中的遗传谱分析:对体外筛选发展的影响","authors":"Makoto Izumiya, Hidehiko Nobuoka, Hono Endo, Rintaro Ueno, Masaki Mimura, Naoto Saito, Hisao Haniu","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines13020489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The translation of in vitro biomaterial evaluations into successful clinical applications often fails due to discrepancies with in vivo results. Previously, we demonstrated that differences in culture medium conditions influence the bone formation process. This study aimed to investigate the influence of culture media on gene expression during calcification induction in osteoblasts. <b>Methods</b>: Using MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in α Minimum Essential Medium without L-ascorbic acid (αMEM(-)) and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), we screened gene expression profiles through microarray analysis and validated key findings with quantitative PCR. Additionally, we compared these gene expression patterns with those in primary osteoblasts (POBs) cultured under the same medium conditions. <b>Results</b>: The results revealed distinct gene expression profiles in MC3T3-E1 cells depending on the culture medium, while POBs exhibited minimal differences between media, except for the gene <i>Alpl</i>. In αMEM(-), <i>Alpl</i> expression in POBs was significantly increased approximately 4-fold via calcification stimulation (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). POBs cultured in DMEM showed calcification appearance differing from the αMEM(-) condition, even though no significant increase in <i>Alpl</i> expression via calcification stimulation was observed. <b>Conclusions</b>: Differences in media appear to remarkably impact osteoblast gene expression and mineralization. These findings may help improve biomaterial evaluation when transitioning from in vitro assessments to in vivo evaluations. Moreover, our results suggest the possibility that gene expression differences observed in MC3T3-E1 cells reflect the diverse bone formation processes in vivo. Focusing on these genes could facilitate the development of screening methods for bone formation, supporting future clinical applications in orthopedics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic Profiling of MC3T3-E1 Cells in Different Media: Implications for In Vitro Screening Development.\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Izumiya, Hidehiko Nobuoka, Hono Endo, Rintaro Ueno, Masaki Mimura, Naoto Saito, Hisao Haniu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomedicines13020489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The translation of in vitro biomaterial evaluations into successful clinical applications often fails due to discrepancies with in vivo results. Previously, we demonstrated that differences in culture medium conditions influence the bone formation process. This study aimed to investigate the influence of culture media on gene expression during calcification induction in osteoblasts. <b>Methods</b>: Using MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in α Minimum Essential Medium without L-ascorbic acid (αMEM(-)) and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), we screened gene expression profiles through microarray analysis and validated key findings with quantitative PCR. Additionally, we compared these gene expression patterns with those in primary osteoblasts (POBs) cultured under the same medium conditions. <b>Results</b>: The results revealed distinct gene expression profiles in MC3T3-E1 cells depending on the culture medium, while POBs exhibited minimal differences between media, except for the gene <i>Alpl</i>. In αMEM(-), <i>Alpl</i> expression in POBs was significantly increased approximately 4-fold via calcification stimulation (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). POBs cultured in DMEM showed calcification appearance differing from the αMEM(-) condition, even though no significant increase in <i>Alpl</i> expression via calcification stimulation was observed. <b>Conclusions</b>: Differences in media appear to remarkably impact osteoblast gene expression and mineralization. These findings may help improve biomaterial evaluation when transitioning from in vitro assessments to in vivo evaluations. Moreover, our results suggest the possibility that gene expression differences observed in MC3T3-E1 cells reflect the diverse bone formation processes in vivo. Focusing on these genes could facilitate the development of screening methods for bone formation, supporting future clinical applications in orthopedics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicines\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:将体外生物材料评价转化为成功的临床应用往往会因为与体内结果的差异而失败。之前,我们证明了培养基条件的差异会影响骨形成过程。本研究旨在探讨培养基对成骨细胞钙化诱导过程中基因表达的影响。方法:采用不含l -抗坏血酸的α Minimum Essential Medium (α mem(-))和Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)培养基培养MC3T3-E1细胞,通过芯片分析筛选基因表达谱,并通过定量PCR验证关键发现。此外,我们将这些基因表达模式与在相同培养基条件下培养的原代成骨细胞(pob)中的基因表达模式进行了比较。结果:MC3T3-E1细胞的基因表达谱因培养基的不同而不同,而pob细胞除Alpl基因外,在培养基之间差异不大。在αMEM(-)中,通过钙化刺激,pob中Alpl的表达显著增加了约4倍(p < 0.0001)。在DMEM中培养的pob表现出不同于αMEM(-)条件下的钙化外观,尽管钙化刺激未观察到Alpl表达的显著增加。结论:培养基的差异似乎显著影响成骨细胞基因表达和矿化。这些发现可能有助于从体外评估过渡到体内评估时改善生物材料的评估。此外,我们的研究结果表明,MC3T3-E1细胞中观察到的基因表达差异可能反映了体内不同的骨形成过程。关注这些基因可以促进骨形成筛选方法的发展,支持未来骨科的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genetic Profiling of MC3T3-E1 Cells in Different Media: Implications for In Vitro Screening Development.

Background/Objectives: The translation of in vitro biomaterial evaluations into successful clinical applications often fails due to discrepancies with in vivo results. Previously, we demonstrated that differences in culture medium conditions influence the bone formation process. This study aimed to investigate the influence of culture media on gene expression during calcification induction in osteoblasts. Methods: Using MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in α Minimum Essential Medium without L-ascorbic acid (αMEM(-)) and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), we screened gene expression profiles through microarray analysis and validated key findings with quantitative PCR. Additionally, we compared these gene expression patterns with those in primary osteoblasts (POBs) cultured under the same medium conditions. Results: The results revealed distinct gene expression profiles in MC3T3-E1 cells depending on the culture medium, while POBs exhibited minimal differences between media, except for the gene Alpl. In αMEM(-), Alpl expression in POBs was significantly increased approximately 4-fold via calcification stimulation (p < 0.0001). POBs cultured in DMEM showed calcification appearance differing from the αMEM(-) condition, even though no significant increase in Alpl expression via calcification stimulation was observed. Conclusions: Differences in media appear to remarkably impact osteoblast gene expression and mineralization. These findings may help improve biomaterial evaluation when transitioning from in vitro assessments to in vivo evaluations. Moreover, our results suggest the possibility that gene expression differences observed in MC3T3-E1 cells reflect the diverse bone formation processes in vivo. Focusing on these genes could facilitate the development of screening methods for bone formation, supporting future clinical applications in orthopedics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Clinical Signs and CBCT-Confirmed TMJ Involvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: The Diagnostic Value of Facial Asymmetry and Mandibular Mobility. Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets Are Associated with Diabetic Kidney Disease and Overall Survival in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Development of Type II Glucose Transporter Inhibitors: Phloretin as a GLUT-2 Screening Template from In Silico Modeling to In Vitro Assessment. NSAID Use Attenuates the Protective Effect of Physical Activity on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES 2009-2010. Evaluation of the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Selected Plant Extracts in an In Vitro Model of Inflammation Using LPS-Stimulated Macrophages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1