一项多中心、随机III期试验:克拉德里滨加入依达柔比星和阿糖胞苷作为新生急性髓性白血病患者的诱导方案

IF 10.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2437
Xiang Zhang, Yue Han, Huiying Qiu, Miaoxinqi Han, Aining Sun, Shengli Xue, Zhengming Jin, Miao Miao, Ying Wang, Chengcheng Fu, Xiaowen Tang, Suning Chen, Caixia Li, Lian Bai, Zhihong Lin, Jun Chen, Haohao Han, Jia Chen, Depei Wu
{"title":"一项多中心、随机III期试验:克拉德里滨加入依达柔比星和阿糖胞苷作为新生急性髓性白血病患者的诱导方案","authors":"Xiang Zhang, Yue Han, Huiying Qiu, Miaoxinqi Han, Aining Sun, Shengli Xue, Zhengming Jin, Miao Miao, Ying Wang, Chengcheng Fu, Xiaowen Tang, Suning Chen, Caixia Li, Lian Bai, Zhihong Lin, Jun Chen, Haohao Han, Jia Chen, Depei Wu","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of an induction regimen composed of idarubicin, cytarabine, and cladribine (IAC) in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adult patients with newly diagnosed AML were randomized to the IAC group (cladribine 5 mg/m2/day for 5 days, idarubicin 8 mg/m2/day for 3 days, and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days) and the IA group (idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days) at a 1:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) after induction. Secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 618 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 80.5% in the IAC group compared with 72.4% in the IA group (P = 0.029). The 2-year OS was 81.3% in the IAC group compared with 70.0% in the IA group (P = 0.011). Patients on the IAC regimen achieved a higher CR rate compared to those on the IA regimen, particularly in those with adverse risk (69.8% vs. 49.1%, P = 0.008), 2-year OS (80.1% vs. IA 58.1%, P = 0.014), and disease-free survival (78.8% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.009). In the subgroup of patients older than 45 years of age, the IAC regimen exerted better CR (77.1% vs. 62.6%, P = 0.033) and 2-year OS (74.7% vs. IA 55.0%, P = 0.019). There were no differences in chemotherapy-related toxicities between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cladribine added to the IA regimen was safe and effective in de novo AML. Patients with adverse risk or those between 45 and 60 years of age might benefit significantly on both response and survival with the IAC regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":"1407-1414"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cladribine Added to Idarubicin and Cytarabine as an Induction Regimen for Patients with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Zhang, Yue Han, Huiying Qiu, Miaoxinqi Han, Aining Sun, Shengli Xue, Zhengming Jin, Miao Miao, Ying Wang, Chengcheng Fu, Xiaowen Tang, Suning Chen, Caixia Li, Lian Bai, Zhihong Lin, Jun Chen, Haohao Han, Jia Chen, Depei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of an induction regimen composed of idarubicin, cytarabine, and cladribine (IAC) in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adult patients with newly diagnosed AML were randomized to the IAC group (cladribine 5 mg/m2/day for 5 days, idarubicin 8 mg/m2/day for 3 days, and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days) and the IA group (idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days) at a 1:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) after induction. Secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 618 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 80.5% in the IAC group compared with 72.4% in the IA group (P = 0.029). The 2-year OS was 81.3% in the IAC group compared with 70.0% in the IA group (P = 0.011). Patients on the IAC regimen achieved a higher CR rate compared to those on the IA regimen, particularly in those with adverse risk (69.8% vs. 49.1%, P = 0.008), 2-year OS (80.1% vs. IA 58.1%, P = 0.014), and disease-free survival (78.8% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.009). In the subgroup of patients older than 45 years of age, the IAC regimen exerted better CR (77.1% vs. 62.6%, P = 0.033) and 2-year OS (74.7% vs. IA 55.0%, P = 0.019). There were no differences in chemotherapy-related toxicities between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cladribine added to the IA regimen was safe and effective in de novo AML. Patients with adverse risk or those between 45 and 60 years of age might benefit significantly on both response and survival with the IAC regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1407-1414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2437\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2437","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估由依达柔比星、阿糖胞苷和克拉德里滨(IAC)组成的诱导方案对新发急性髓性白血病(AML)患者的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:新诊断的成年AML患者按1:2的比例随机分为IAC组(克拉多滨5mg /m2/天,伊达柔比星8mg /m2/天,3天,阿糖胞苷100mg /m2/天,7天)和IA组(伊达柔比星12mg /m2/天,3天,阿糖胞苷100mg /m2/天,7天)。主要终点是诱导后完全缓解(CR)。次要终点包括2年总生存期(OS)、无病生存期和累积复发率。结果:共纳入618例新诊断的AML成年患者。IAC组总CR率为80.5%,IA组为72.4% (P = 0.029)。IAC组2年OS为81.3%,IA组为70.0% (P = 0.011)。与IA方案相比,IAC方案患者的CR率更高,特别是在不良风险(69.8%对49.1%,P = 0.008), 2年OS(80.1%对IA 58.1%, P = 0.014)和无病生存(78.8%对51.3%,P = 0.009)的患者中。在年龄大于45岁的患者亚组中,IAC方案具有更好的CR (77.1% vs. 62.6%, P = 0.033)和2年OS (74.7% vs. IA 55.0%, P = 0.019)。两组间化疗相关毒性无差异。结论:Cladribine联合IA方案治疗新发AML安全有效。有不良风险的患者或年龄在45 - 60岁之间的患者可能在IAC方案的反应和生存方面都有显著的获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cladribine Added to Idarubicin and Cytarabine as an Induction Regimen for Patients with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of an induction regimen composed of idarubicin, cytarabine, and cladribine (IAC) in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Patients and methods: Adult patients with newly diagnosed AML were randomized to the IAC group (cladribine 5 mg/m2/day for 5 days, idarubicin 8 mg/m2/day for 3 days, and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days) and the IA group (idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days) at a 1:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) after induction. Secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse.

Results: A total of 618 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 80.5% in the IAC group compared with 72.4% in the IA group (P = 0.029). The 2-year OS was 81.3% in the IAC group compared with 70.0% in the IA group (P = 0.011). Patients on the IAC regimen achieved a higher CR rate compared to those on the IA regimen, particularly in those with adverse risk (69.8% vs. 49.1%, P = 0.008), 2-year OS (80.1% vs. IA 58.1%, P = 0.014), and disease-free survival (78.8% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.009). In the subgroup of patients older than 45 years of age, the IAC regimen exerted better CR (77.1% vs. 62.6%, P = 0.033) and 2-year OS (74.7% vs. IA 55.0%, P = 0.019). There were no differences in chemotherapy-related toxicities between the groups.

Conclusions: Cladribine added to the IA regimen was safe and effective in de novo AML. Patients with adverse risk or those between 45 and 60 years of age might benefit significantly on both response and survival with the IAC regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
Early ctDNA stratifies survival in locally advanced and oligometastatic lung cancer treated with radiotherapy. Multi-Omic Landscape of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in a Real-World Patient Cohort of 1,427 Cases. Evaluation of Tissue from Patients with Prostate Cancer Identifies B7-H3 as an Androgen-Regulated, Broadly-Expressed, Combinatorial Therapeutic Target. Tumor microenvironment gene engineering with LOAd703 in patients with solid malignancies: LOKON002 phase I/IIb clinical trial. A Randomized, Phase II Clinical Trial of FLT-PET and FDG-PET for Early Response Assessment of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1