Yaxin Zhang, Jidong Wang, Baoliang Jiao, Dongwei Feng, Zhaowei Li
{"title":"Ilizarov骨转运技术治疗胫骨骨缺损的功能结局及并发症分析。","authors":"Yaxin Zhang, Jidong Wang, Baoliang Jiao, Dongwei Feng, Zhaowei Li","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trifocal bone transport (TF) rather than bifocal bone transport (BF) can shorten the treatment time when treating of large bone defect in tibia. However, few studies have reported efficacy and complications among different bone transport.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of bone transport technique for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study including 48 patients who underwent bone transport for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia from May 2015 to September 2019. A total of 30 were treated by bifocal bone transport (BF group) and 18 by trifocal bone transport (TF group). Patient demographic data, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative variables, complications and clinical outcomes of the two groups were recorded and compared at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative complications were also evaluated according to Paley classification. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated at the last clinical follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients with an average follow-up of 27.5 months. All patients achieved complete union in the docking site and consolidation in the regenerate bone. Compared to the BF group, the TF group had a longer bone defect length(9.08 ± 1.74 > 6.33 ± 3.15, P < 0.01) but a shorter external fixation index (42.22 ± 2.41 < 65.82 ± 6.98, P < 0.001). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.6 and 1.7 for BF and TF patients (P > 0.05). At the postoperative follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the bone and functional results (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For tibial bone defects, both bifocal and trifocal bone transport can achieve good clinical results. Compared to the bifocal bone transport, The trifocal bone transport can significantly shorten the external fixation index without increasing the incidence of associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of functional outcomes and complications of tibial bone defects treated with Ilizarov bone transport technique.\",\"authors\":\"Yaxin Zhang, Jidong Wang, Baoliang Jiao, Dongwei Feng, Zhaowei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trifocal bone transport (TF) rather than bifocal bone transport (BF) can shorten the treatment time when treating of large bone defect in tibia. However, few studies have reported efficacy and complications among different bone transport.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of bone transport technique for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study including 48 patients who underwent bone transport for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia from May 2015 to September 2019. A total of 30 were treated by bifocal bone transport (BF group) and 18 by trifocal bone transport (TF group). Patient demographic data, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative variables, complications and clinical outcomes of the two groups were recorded and compared at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative complications were also evaluated according to Paley classification. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated at the last clinical follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients with an average follow-up of 27.5 months. All patients achieved complete union in the docking site and consolidation in the regenerate bone. Compared to the BF group, the TF group had a longer bone defect length(9.08 ± 1.74 > 6.33 ± 3.15, P < 0.01) but a shorter external fixation index (42.22 ± 2.41 < 65.82 ± 6.98, P < 0.001). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.6 and 1.7 for BF and TF patients (P > 0.05). At the postoperative follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the bone and functional results (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For tibial bone defects, both bifocal and trifocal bone transport can achieve good clinical results. Compared to the bifocal bone transport, The trifocal bone transport can significantly shorten the external fixation index without increasing the incidence of associated complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08454-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在治疗胫骨大面积骨缺损时,三焦骨转运(TF)比双焦骨转运(BF)能缩短治疗时间。然而,很少有研究报道不同骨运输方式的疗效和并发症。目的:评价骨转运技术治疗胫骨大面积骨缺损的疗效及并发症。方法:对2015年5月至2019年9月行骨转运治疗胫骨大面积骨缺损的48例患者进行回顾性研究。双焦点骨运输组30例,三焦点骨运输组18例。记录两组患者的人口学资料、术中结果、术后变量、并发症和临床结果,并在至少24个月的随访中进行比较。根据Paley分类对术后并发症进行评估。最后一次临床随访时,参照美国Ilizarov方法研究与应用协会(ASAMI)标准对患者的骨骼和功能进行评估。结果:所有患者平均随访27.5个月。所有患者在对接部位均实现完全愈合,再生骨均实现实变。与BF组相比,TF组骨缺损长度更长(9.08±1.74 bb0 6.33±3.15 bb0, P 0.05)。术后随访,两组患者骨功能指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:对于胫骨骨缺损,双焦点和三焦点骨转运均可取得良好的临床效果。与双焦点骨运输相比,三焦点骨运输可显著缩短外固定指数,且不增加相关并发症的发生率。
Analysis of functional outcomes and complications of tibial bone defects treated with Ilizarov bone transport technique.
Background: Trifocal bone transport (TF) rather than bifocal bone transport (BF) can shorten the treatment time when treating of large bone defect in tibia. However, few studies have reported efficacy and complications among different bone transport.
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of bone transport technique for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia.
Methods: The retrospective study including 48 patients who underwent bone transport for the treatment of large bone defect in tibia from May 2015 to September 2019. A total of 30 were treated by bifocal bone transport (BF group) and 18 by trifocal bone transport (TF group). Patient demographic data, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative variables, complications and clinical outcomes of the two groups were recorded and compared at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative complications were also evaluated according to Paley classification. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated at the last clinical follow-up.
Results: All patients with an average follow-up of 27.5 months. All patients achieved complete union in the docking site and consolidation in the regenerate bone. Compared to the BF group, the TF group had a longer bone defect length(9.08 ± 1.74 > 6.33 ± 3.15, P < 0.01) but a shorter external fixation index (42.22 ± 2.41 < 65.82 ± 6.98, P < 0.001). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.6 and 1.7 for BF and TF patients (P > 0.05). At the postoperative follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the bone and functional results (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: For tibial bone defects, both bifocal and trifocal bone transport can achieve good clinical results. Compared to the bifocal bone transport, The trifocal bone transport can significantly shorten the external fixation index without increasing the incidence of associated complications.
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.