基于深度学习的全景x线片根尖周病变检测。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15040510
Viktor Szabó, Kaan Orhan, Csaba Dobó-Nagy, Dániel Sándor Veres, David Manulis, Matvey Ezhov, Alex Sanders, Bence Tamás Szabó
{"title":"基于深度学习的全景x线片根尖周病变检测。","authors":"Viktor Szabó, Kaan Orhan, Csaba Dobó-Nagy, Dániel Sándor Veres, David Manulis, Matvey Ezhov, Alex Sanders, Bence Tamás Szabó","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15040510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Our study aimed to determine the accuracy of the artificial intelligence-based Diagnocat system (DC) in detecting periapical lesions (PL) on panoramic radiographs (PRs). <b>Methods:</b> 616 teeth were selected from 357 panoramic radiographs, including 308 teeth with clearly visible periapical radiolucency and 308 without any periapical lesion. Three groups were generated: teeth with radiographic signs of caries (Group 1), teeth with coronal restoration (Group 2), and teeth with root canal filling (Group 3). The PRs were uploaded to the Diagnocat system for evaluation. The performance of the convolutional neural network in detecting PLs was assessed by its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as the diagnostic accuracy value. We investigated the possible effect of the palatoglossal air space (PGAS) on the evaluation of the AI tool. <b>Results:</b> DC identified periapical lesions in 240 (77.9%) cases out of the 308 teeth with PL and detected no PL in 68 (22.1%) teeth with PL. The AI-based system detected no PL in any of the groups without PL. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of DC were 0.78, 1.00, and 0.89, respectively. Considering these parameters for each group, Group 2 showed the highest values at 0.84, 1.00, and 0.95, respectively. Fisher's Exact test showed that PGAS does not significantly affect (<i>p</i> = 1) the detection of PL in the upper teeth. The AI-based system showed lower probability values for detecting PL in the case of central incisors, wisdom teeth, and canines. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of DC for detecting PL on canines showed lower values at 0.27 and 0.64, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The CNN-based Diagnocat system can support the diagnosis of PL on PRs and serves as a decision-support tool during radiographic assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-Based Periapical Lesion Detection on Panoramic Radiographs.\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Szabó, Kaan Orhan, Csaba Dobó-Nagy, Dániel Sándor Veres, David Manulis, Matvey Ezhov, Alex Sanders, Bence Tamás Szabó\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15040510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Our study aimed to determine the accuracy of the artificial intelligence-based Diagnocat system (DC) in detecting periapical lesions (PL) on panoramic radiographs (PRs). <b>Methods:</b> 616 teeth were selected from 357 panoramic radiographs, including 308 teeth with clearly visible periapical radiolucency and 308 without any periapical lesion. Three groups were generated: teeth with radiographic signs of caries (Group 1), teeth with coronal restoration (Group 2), and teeth with root canal filling (Group 3). The PRs were uploaded to the Diagnocat system for evaluation. The performance of the convolutional neural network in detecting PLs was assessed by its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as the diagnostic accuracy value. We investigated the possible effect of the palatoglossal air space (PGAS) on the evaluation of the AI tool. <b>Results:</b> DC identified periapical lesions in 240 (77.9%) cases out of the 308 teeth with PL and detected no PL in 68 (22.1%) teeth with PL. The AI-based system detected no PL in any of the groups without PL. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of DC were 0.78, 1.00, and 0.89, respectively. Considering these parameters for each group, Group 2 showed the highest values at 0.84, 1.00, and 0.95, respectively. Fisher's Exact test showed that PGAS does not significantly affect (<i>p</i> = 1) the detection of PL in the upper teeth. The AI-based system showed lower probability values for detecting PL in the case of central incisors, wisdom teeth, and canines. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of DC for detecting PL on canines showed lower values at 0.27 and 0.64, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The CNN-based Diagnocat system can support the diagnosis of PL on PRs and serves as a decision-support tool during radiographic assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854226/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040510\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在确定基于人工智能的诊断系统(DC)在全景x线片(pr)上检测根尖周病变(PL)的准确性。方法:从357张全景x线片中选择616颗牙,其中根尖周透光度清晰的牙308颗,根尖周无病变的牙308颗。产生三组:有龋齿影像学表现的牙齿(1组)、冠状修复的牙齿(2组)和根管填充的牙齿(3组)。将pr上传到诊断系统进行评估。通过其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值以及诊断准确性来评估卷积神经网络检测PLs的性能。我们研究了腭舌空气空间(PGAS)对人工智能工具评估的可能影响。结果:308例牙周病变中,DC检出牙周病变240例(77.9%),有牙周病变68例(22.1%)未检出牙周病变。无牙周病变组均未检出牙周病变,DC的总体敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为0.78、1.00和0.89。综合各组参数,组2最高,分别为0.84、1.00、0.95。Fisher's Exact检验显示PGAS对上牙PL的检测无显著影响(p = 1)。基于人工智能的系统在中门牙、智齿和犬齿的情况下检测PL的概率值较低。DC检测犬PL的灵敏度和诊断准确率较低,分别为0.27和0.64。结论:基于cnn的诊断系统可支持pr上PL的诊断,可作为影像学评估的决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Learning-Based Periapical Lesion Detection on Panoramic Radiographs.

Background/Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the accuracy of the artificial intelligence-based Diagnocat system (DC) in detecting periapical lesions (PL) on panoramic radiographs (PRs). Methods: 616 teeth were selected from 357 panoramic radiographs, including 308 teeth with clearly visible periapical radiolucency and 308 without any periapical lesion. Three groups were generated: teeth with radiographic signs of caries (Group 1), teeth with coronal restoration (Group 2), and teeth with root canal filling (Group 3). The PRs were uploaded to the Diagnocat system for evaluation. The performance of the convolutional neural network in detecting PLs was assessed by its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as the diagnostic accuracy value. We investigated the possible effect of the palatoglossal air space (PGAS) on the evaluation of the AI tool. Results: DC identified periapical lesions in 240 (77.9%) cases out of the 308 teeth with PL and detected no PL in 68 (22.1%) teeth with PL. The AI-based system detected no PL in any of the groups without PL. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of DC were 0.78, 1.00, and 0.89, respectively. Considering these parameters for each group, Group 2 showed the highest values at 0.84, 1.00, and 0.95, respectively. Fisher's Exact test showed that PGAS does not significantly affect (p = 1) the detection of PL in the upper teeth. The AI-based system showed lower probability values for detecting PL in the case of central incisors, wisdom teeth, and canines. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of DC for detecting PL on canines showed lower values at 0.27 and 0.64, respectively. Conclusions: The CNN-based Diagnocat system can support the diagnosis of PL on PRs and serves as a decision-support tool during radiographic assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Corneal Toxicity of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine: Multimodal Imaging Features and Implications for Ophthalmologic Management. Meta-Analytic Modeling to Define Decision Thresholds for Cerebrospinal Fluid Heparin-Binding Protein in Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis. Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review. Preoperative Gadoxetic-Acid-Enhanced MRI Features Associated with Rapid Recurrence (<6 Months) After Curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Investigation of the Prevalence of Associated Genetic Mutations (Co-Mutations) in Patients with Actionable Driver Mutations in Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1