从传统方法到人工智能,消除内镜下息肉测量的猜测工作。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002161
Anthony Kerbage, Tarek Souaid, Kailash Singh, Carol A Burke
{"title":"从传统方法到人工智能,消除内镜下息肉测量的猜测工作。","authors":"Anthony Kerbage, Tarek Souaid, Kailash Singh, Carol A Burke","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colonoscopy is a crucial tool for evaluating lower gastrointestinal disease, monitoring high-risk patients for colorectal neoplasia, and screening for colorectal cancer. In the United States, over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually, with a significant portion dedicated to post-polypectomy follow-up. Accurate measurement of colorectal polyp size during colonoscopy is essential, as it influences patient management, including the determination of surveillance intervals, resection strategies, and the assessment of malignancy risk. Despite its importance, many endoscopists typically rely on visual estimation alone, which is often imprecise due to technological and human biases, frequently leading to overestimations of polyp size and unnecessarily shortened surveillance intervals. To address these challenges, multiple tools and technologies have been developed to enhance the accuracy of polyp size estimation. The review examines the evolution of polyp measurement techniques, ranging from through-the-scope tools to computer-based and artificial intelligence-assisted technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"497-503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the Guess Work Out of Endoscopic Polyp Measurement: From Traditional Methods to AI.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Kerbage, Tarek Souaid, Kailash Singh, Carol A Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colonoscopy is a crucial tool for evaluating lower gastrointestinal disease, monitoring high-risk patients for colorectal neoplasia, and screening for colorectal cancer. In the United States, over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually, with a significant portion dedicated to post-polypectomy follow-up. Accurate measurement of colorectal polyp size during colonoscopy is essential, as it influences patient management, including the determination of surveillance intervals, resection strategies, and the assessment of malignancy risk. Despite its importance, many endoscopists typically rely on visual estimation alone, which is often imprecise due to technological and human biases, frequently leading to overestimations of polyp size and unnecessarily shortened surveillance intervals. To address these challenges, multiple tools and technologies have been developed to enhance the accuracy of polyp size estimation. The review examines the evolution of polyp measurement techniques, ranging from through-the-scope tools to computer-based and artificial intelligence-assisted technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"497-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结肠镜检查是评估下消化道疾病、监测结直肠肿瘤高危患者和筛查结直肠癌的重要工具。在美国,每年进行超过1400万次结肠镜检查,其中很大一部分用于息肉切除术后的随访。结肠镜检查时准确测量结直肠息肉大小至关重要,因为它影响患者的治疗,包括监测间隔的确定、切除策略和恶性肿瘤风险的评估。尽管它很重要,但许多内窥镜医生通常只依靠视觉估计,由于技术和人类的偏见,这往往是不精确的,经常导致对息肉大小的高估和不必要的缩短监测间隔。为了应对这些挑战,已经开发了多种工具和技术来提高息肉大小估计的准确性。该综述审查了息肉测量技术的发展,范围从贯穿范围的工具到基于计算机和人工智能辅助的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking the Guess Work Out of Endoscopic Polyp Measurement: From Traditional Methods to AI.

Colonoscopy is a crucial tool for evaluating lower gastrointestinal disease, monitoring high-risk patients for colorectal neoplasia, and screening for colorectal cancer. In the United States, over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually, with a significant portion dedicated to post-polypectomy follow-up. Accurate measurement of colorectal polyp size during colonoscopy is essential, as it influences patient management, including the determination of surveillance intervals, resection strategies, and the assessment of malignancy risk. Despite its importance, many endoscopists typically rely on visual estimation alone, which is often imprecise due to technological and human biases, frequently leading to overestimations of polyp size and unnecessarily shortened surveillance intervals. To address these challenges, multiple tools and technologies have been developed to enhance the accuracy of polyp size estimation. The review examines the evolution of polyp measurement techniques, ranging from through-the-scope tools to computer-based and artificial intelligence-assisted technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
A Population-Based Assessment of Physical Activity and Exercise in Persons With IBD. When Normal Imaging Says Enough: Rethinking the Role of Patency Capsule in Crohn's Disease. Impact of Primary Language on Early Repeat Screening Colonoscopy. Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis Warranted in All Patients With Biliary Obstruction Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Outcomes of HIV-positive Patients With Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the United States: An Analysis From the National Inpatient Sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1