医护人员抗SARS-CoV-2 MMR疫苗的有效性和免疫原性

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Viruses-Basel Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3390/v17020215
Hyeri Seok, Joon-Yong Bae, Jooyun Kim, Won Suk Choi, Heedo Park, Jungmin Lee, Sohyun Lee, Chulwoo Kim, Man-Seong Park, Dae Won Park
{"title":"医护人员抗SARS-CoV-2 MMR疫苗的有效性和免疫原性","authors":"Hyeri Seok, Joon-Yong Bae, Jooyun Kim, Won Suk Choi, Heedo Park, Jungmin Lee, Sohyun Lee, Chulwoo Kim, Man-Seong Park, Dae Won Park","doi":"10.3390/v17020215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and immunogenicity of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers at one medical institution. The effectiveness of the MMR vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated in overall healthcare workers (HCWs). In addition, neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were measured according to the subjects' measles immunity status with serum samples collected before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period. The effectiveness of the MMR vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in all HCWs and measles IgG-positive subjects was 34% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-2.70) and 34% (aOR = 0.66, CI = 0.38-18.4), respectively. The neutralizing antibody levels for SARS-CoV-2 were low in all groups regardless of the measles immune status. The MMR vaccine alone may not provide sufficient protection against SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Immunogenicity of the MMR Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 Among Healthcare Workers.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeri Seok, Joon-Yong Bae, Jooyun Kim, Won Suk Choi, Heedo Park, Jungmin Lee, Sohyun Lee, Chulwoo Kim, Man-Seong Park, Dae Won Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v17020215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and immunogenicity of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers at one medical institution. The effectiveness of the MMR vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated in overall healthcare workers (HCWs). In addition, neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were measured according to the subjects' measles immunity status with serum samples collected before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period. The effectiveness of the MMR vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in all HCWs and measles IgG-positive subjects was 34% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-2.70) and 34% (aOR = 0.66, CI = 0.38-18.4), respectively. The neutralizing antibody levels for SARS-CoV-2 were low in all groups regardless of the measles immune status. The MMR vaccine alone may not provide sufficient protection against SARS-CoV-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17020215\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17020215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一家医疗机构医护人员接种麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)疫苗对SARS-CoV-2的有效性和免疫原性。在全体卫生保健工作者(HCWs)中评估了针对SARS-CoV-2的MMR疫苗的有效性。此外,根据受试者在2019冠状病毒病大流行前的麻疹免疫状况,采集血清样本,检测对SARS-CoV-2的中和抗体。在所有HCWs和麻疹igg阳性受试者中,MMR疫苗对SARS-CoV-2的有效性分别为34%(校正优势比[aOR] = 1.20, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.53-2.70)和34% (aOR = 0.66, CI = 0.38-18.4)。无论麻疹免疫状态如何,所有组的SARS-CoV-2中和抗体水平均较低。单独使用MMR疫苗可能无法提供针对SARS-CoV-2的足够保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and Immunogenicity of the MMR Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 Among Healthcare Workers.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and immunogenicity of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers at one medical institution. The effectiveness of the MMR vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated in overall healthcare workers (HCWs). In addition, neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were measured according to the subjects' measles immunity status with serum samples collected before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period. The effectiveness of the MMR vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in all HCWs and measles IgG-positive subjects was 34% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-2.70) and 34% (aOR = 0.66, CI = 0.38-18.4), respectively. The neutralizing antibody levels for SARS-CoV-2 were low in all groups regardless of the measles immune status. The MMR vaccine alone may not provide sufficient protection against SARS-CoV-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Viruses-Basel
Viruses-Basel VIROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
First Report of Orthonairovirus songlingense in Haemaphysalis concinna Ticks from Russia. Burden of Malaria and Dengue Across Global, Asian, and Chinese Populations Based on GBD 2021 Data: A Quantitative Assessment of Importation Risks to China. Correction: Bulatov et al. Camelpox Virus in Western Kazakhstan: Assessment of the Role of Local Fauna as Reservoirs of Infection. Viruses 2024, 16, 1626. Epidemiological and Virological Characteristics of H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus in Jiangsu Province, China, 2024. Analysis of Epidemiological and Molecular Characteristics of Bocavirus in Guangzhou.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1