糖尿病护理咨询的机器人辅助方法:提高患者参与度,发现治疗问题。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicina-Lithuania Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.3390/medicina61020352
Yuya Asada, Tomomi Horiguchi, Kunimasa Yagi, Mako Komatsu, Ayaka Yamashita, Ren Ueta, Naoto Yamaaki, Mikifumi Shikida, Shuichi Nishio, Michiko Inagaki
{"title":"糖尿病护理咨询的机器人辅助方法:提高患者参与度,发现治疗问题。","authors":"Yuya Asada, Tomomi Horiguchi, Kunimasa Yagi, Mako Komatsu, Ayaka Yamashita, Ren Ueta, Naoto Yamaaki, Mikifumi Shikida, Shuichi Nishio, Michiko Inagaki","doi":"10.3390/medicina61020352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Diabetes is a rapidly increasing global health challenge compounded by a critical shortage of diabetes care and education specialists. Robot-assisted diabetes care offers a cost-effective and scalable alternative to traditional methods such as training and dispatching human experts. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using robots for diabetes care consultations by examining their ability to elicit meaningful patient feedback, identify therapeutic issues, and assess their potential as substitutes for human specialists. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A robot-assisted consultation programme was developed by selecting an appropriate robot, designing the programme content, and tailoring back-channel communication elements. Experienced diabetes care nurses operated the robot during the consultations. Patient feedback was collected through a 17-item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale (evaluating functionality, impressions, and effects). Additionally, a five-item questionnaire was used to assess whether the programme helped patients reflect on the key therapeutic domains of diabetes knowledge, diet, exercise, medications, and blood glucose control. <i>Results</i>: This study included 32 participants (22 males; mean age, 69.7 ± 12.6 years; mean HbA1c, 7.2 ± 1.0%). None of the participants reported any discomfort during the consultation. Sixteen of the seventeen feedback items scored above the median of 3, as did all five therapeutic reflection items. The interview content analysis revealed the programme's ability to differentiate patients facing issues in treatment compliance from those effectively managing their condition. Robots can elicit valuable patient narratives like human specialists. <i>Conclusions</i>: The results of this pilot study support the feasibility of robot-assisted diabetes care to assist human experts. Future research should explore the programme's application with healthcare professionals with limited experience in diabetes care, further demonstrating its scalability and utility in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-Assisted Approach to Diabetes Care Consultations: Enhancing Patient Engagement and Identifying Therapeutic Issues.\",\"authors\":\"Yuya Asada, Tomomi Horiguchi, Kunimasa Yagi, Mako Komatsu, Ayaka Yamashita, Ren Ueta, Naoto Yamaaki, Mikifumi Shikida, Shuichi Nishio, Michiko Inagaki\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina61020352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Diabetes is a rapidly increasing global health challenge compounded by a critical shortage of diabetes care and education specialists. Robot-assisted diabetes care offers a cost-effective and scalable alternative to traditional methods such as training and dispatching human experts. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using robots for diabetes care consultations by examining their ability to elicit meaningful patient feedback, identify therapeutic issues, and assess their potential as substitutes for human specialists. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A robot-assisted consultation programme was developed by selecting an appropriate robot, designing the programme content, and tailoring back-channel communication elements. Experienced diabetes care nurses operated the robot during the consultations. Patient feedback was collected through a 17-item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale (evaluating functionality, impressions, and effects). Additionally, a five-item questionnaire was used to assess whether the programme helped patients reflect on the key therapeutic domains of diabetes knowledge, diet, exercise, medications, and blood glucose control. <i>Results</i>: This study included 32 participants (22 males; mean age, 69.7 ± 12.6 years; mean HbA1c, 7.2 ± 1.0%). None of the participants reported any discomfort during the consultation. Sixteen of the seventeen feedback items scored above the median of 3, as did all five therapeutic reflection items. The interview content analysis revealed the programme's ability to differentiate patients facing issues in treatment compliance from those effectively managing their condition. Robots can elicit valuable patient narratives like human specialists. <i>Conclusions</i>: The results of this pilot study support the feasibility of robot-assisted diabetes care to assist human experts. Future research should explore the programme's application with healthcare professionals with limited experience in diabetes care, further demonstrating its scalability and utility in diverse healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":\"61 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020352\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robot-Assisted Approach to Diabetes Care Consultations: Enhancing Patient Engagement and Identifying Therapeutic Issues.

Background and Objectives: Diabetes is a rapidly increasing global health challenge compounded by a critical shortage of diabetes care and education specialists. Robot-assisted diabetes care offers a cost-effective and scalable alternative to traditional methods such as training and dispatching human experts. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using robots for diabetes care consultations by examining their ability to elicit meaningful patient feedback, identify therapeutic issues, and assess their potential as substitutes for human specialists. Materials and Methods: A robot-assisted consultation programme was developed by selecting an appropriate robot, designing the programme content, and tailoring back-channel communication elements. Experienced diabetes care nurses operated the robot during the consultations. Patient feedback was collected through a 17-item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale (evaluating functionality, impressions, and effects). Additionally, a five-item questionnaire was used to assess whether the programme helped patients reflect on the key therapeutic domains of diabetes knowledge, diet, exercise, medications, and blood glucose control. Results: This study included 32 participants (22 males; mean age, 69.7 ± 12.6 years; mean HbA1c, 7.2 ± 1.0%). None of the participants reported any discomfort during the consultation. Sixteen of the seventeen feedback items scored above the median of 3, as did all five therapeutic reflection items. The interview content analysis revealed the programme's ability to differentiate patients facing issues in treatment compliance from those effectively managing their condition. Robots can elicit valuable patient narratives like human specialists. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study support the feasibility of robot-assisted diabetes care to assist human experts. Future research should explore the programme's application with healthcare professionals with limited experience in diabetes care, further demonstrating its scalability and utility in diverse healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
期刊最新文献
Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging the Gap Between Mechanisms, Risk, and Therapy. Assessment of Pain, Diet, and Analgesic Use in Orthodontic Patients: An Observational Study. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Obesity Risk Prediction and Management: Approaches, Insights, and Recommendations. Can Clinical, Psychological, and Cognitive Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Help to Discriminate Women with Fibromyalgia from Those with Other Localized/Regional Pain Conditions? A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Diagnostic Criteria, Clinical Features, and Prognosis-A Focused Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1