荷兰人生命最后一年的健康和长期护理费用。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s10198-025-01763-w
Christel E van Dijk, Tristan Langereis, Jan-Willem H Dik, Trynke Hoekstra, Bernard van den Berg
{"title":"荷兰人生命最后一年的健康和长期护理费用。","authors":"Christel E van Dijk, Tristan Langereis, Jan-Willem H Dik, Trynke Hoekstra, Bernard van den Berg","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01763-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowing the determinants of rising health and long-term care costs is crucial to support cost containment policies and to predict future expenditures. According to the \"red herring\" debate, not ageing per se, but proximity to death is the most important determinant of future expenditures. This study aims to update and expand the existing Dutch literature after two major reforms in health and long-term care. Insurance claims data from 2018-2019 of 13,738,193 insured individuals were included. Using negative binomial regression analyses, the association between deceased individuals and survivors on total health and long-term care costs was investigated, as well as per health care sector. Costs rose sharply in the two months prior to death. Regression models showed an association with total health and long-term care costs of 10.8 for deceased individuals compared with survivors (crude model) and 3.3 (adjusted model). Especially including age and chronic diseases decreased the association. The largest differences in costs between deceased individuals and survivors in the adjusted model were found for geriatric rehabilitation care and primary care stays (16.7), home nursing (10,6), and long-term care (9.3). Not just the costs of deceased individuals are important for health care costs, but also age, as measured by being in the highest age category, and chronic diseases. The costs of deceased individuals were heterogeneous across health care sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1149-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The health and long-term care costs in the last year of life in The Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Christel E van Dijk, Tristan Langereis, Jan-Willem H Dik, Trynke Hoekstra, Bernard van den Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01763-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Knowing the determinants of rising health and long-term care costs is crucial to support cost containment policies and to predict future expenditures. According to the \\\"red herring\\\" debate, not ageing per se, but proximity to death is the most important determinant of future expenditures. This study aims to update and expand the existing Dutch literature after two major reforms in health and long-term care. Insurance claims data from 2018-2019 of 13,738,193 insured individuals were included. Using negative binomial regression analyses, the association between deceased individuals and survivors on total health and long-term care costs was investigated, as well as per health care sector. Costs rose sharply in the two months prior to death. Regression models showed an association with total health and long-term care costs of 10.8 for deceased individuals compared with survivors (crude model) and 3.3 (adjusted model). Especially including age and chronic diseases decreased the association. The largest differences in costs between deceased individuals and survivors in the adjusted model were found for geriatric rehabilitation care and primary care stays (16.7), home nursing (10,6), and long-term care (9.3). Not just the costs of deceased individuals are important for health care costs, but also age, as measured by being in the highest age category, and chronic diseases. The costs of deceased individuals were heterogeneous across health care sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1149-1162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01763-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01763-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解保健和长期护理费用上升的决定因素对于支持成本控制政策和预测未来支出至关重要。根据“转移注意力”的辩论,不是老龄化本身,而是临近死亡是未来支出的最重要决定因素。本研究旨在更新和扩大现有的荷兰文献在卫生和长期护理两大改革后。该研究包括2018-2019年13738193名投保人的保险索赔数据。使用负二项回归分析,调查了死者和幸存者在总健康和长期护理费用以及每个卫生保健部门之间的关系。死亡前两个月,费用急剧上升。回归模型显示,与幸存者(原始模型)和3.3(调整模型)相比,死亡个体与总健康和长期护理成本的相关性为10.8。特别是包括年龄和慢性疾病的相关性降低。在调整后的模型中,死者和幸存者之间的成本差异最大的是老年康复护理和初级护理住院(16.7)、家庭护理(10.6)和长期护理(9.3)。不仅死者的费用对医疗保健费用很重要,年龄(以最高年龄类别衡量)和慢性病也很重要。各个卫生保健部门的死亡费用各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The health and long-term care costs in the last year of life in The Netherlands.

Knowing the determinants of rising health and long-term care costs is crucial to support cost containment policies and to predict future expenditures. According to the "red herring" debate, not ageing per se, but proximity to death is the most important determinant of future expenditures. This study aims to update and expand the existing Dutch literature after two major reforms in health and long-term care. Insurance claims data from 2018-2019 of 13,738,193 insured individuals were included. Using negative binomial regression analyses, the association between deceased individuals and survivors on total health and long-term care costs was investigated, as well as per health care sector. Costs rose sharply in the two months prior to death. Regression models showed an association with total health and long-term care costs of 10.8 for deceased individuals compared with survivors (crude model) and 3.3 (adjusted model). Especially including age and chronic diseases decreased the association. The largest differences in costs between deceased individuals and survivors in the adjusted model were found for geriatric rehabilitation care and primary care stays (16.7), home nursing (10,6), and long-term care (9.3). Not just the costs of deceased individuals are important for health care costs, but also age, as measured by being in the highest age category, and chronic diseases. The costs of deceased individuals were heterogeneous across health care sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
A comparative analysis of managed entry agreements in Europe: trends, reporting practices, and financial outcomes. Comparing universal health coverage models: an analysis of policy transmission efficiency in SAARC and ASEAN countries. Development and validation of solomon's socioeconomic status index (SESI): a multidimensional household classification tool for South Asia. Who pays and Who benefits? A distributional health-economic evaluation of strengthening the UK soft drinks industry levy. Getting fairer over time? Assessing changes in health technology funding processes using the accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1