经腹机器人辅助肾部分切除术和ct引导下经皮冷冻消融治疗肝移植术后新生肾肿瘤。

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Life-Basel Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.3390/life15020254
Emanuele Balzano, Lorenzo Bernardi, Gianvito Candita, Arianna Trizzino, Lorenzo Petagna, Elena Bozzi, Paola Scalise, Alessandra Cristaudi, Giovanni Tincani, Daniele Pezzati, Davide Ghinolfi, Laura Crocetti
{"title":"经腹机器人辅助肾部分切除术和ct引导下经皮冷冻消融治疗肝移植术后新生肾肿瘤。","authors":"Emanuele Balzano, Lorenzo Bernardi, Gianvito Candita, Arianna Trizzino, Lorenzo Petagna, Elena Bozzi, Paola Scalise, Alessandra Cristaudi, Giovanni Tincani, Daniele Pezzati, Davide Ghinolfi, Laura Crocetti","doi":"10.3390/life15020254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of de novo kidney tumors (DKTs) after liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to previous transplant surgery and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity. Minimally invasive renal-sparing strategies like robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) are favored, but a transperitoneal approach may be limited by the previous transplant surgery and the location of the DKT; in such cases, CT-guided cryoablation may be an alternative option. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare RPN and cryoablation for the treatment of DKT in LT recipients. The primary endpoints were the efficacy (R0 resection in RPN, absence of the tumor at first follow-up for cryoablation) and the safety of the procedures (postoperative morbidity and increase in creatine level). The periprocedural costs and the oncologic efficacy (recurrence and overall survival) were the secondary endpoints. Twelve LT recipients (91.7% males, mean age 65 years) underwent RPN (n = 6) or cryoablation (n = 6) for DKT; the median interval between LT and diagnosis of DKT was 142.5 vs. 117.5 months, respectively. Efficacy was obtained in all patients after RPN and cryoablation. Postoperative morbidity was 16.7% in each group, and the postoperative increase in creatinine values was similar. Hospital stay was shorter following cryoablation vs. RPN (3.1 vs. 6.7 days; <i>p</i> = 0.03). The mean procedural costs were higher for RPN. There was no mortality and none of the patients had signs of recurrence after a median follow-up of 40.5 months. Both RPN and CT-guided cryoablation were safe and effective for the treatment of selected patients with DKT after LT. When applicable, cryoablation may be cost-effective and provide faster recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transabdominal Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and CT-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation for the Treatment of De Novo Kidney Tumors After Liver Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Balzano, Lorenzo Bernardi, Gianvito Candita, Arianna Trizzino, Lorenzo Petagna, Elena Bozzi, Paola Scalise, Alessandra Cristaudi, Giovanni Tincani, Daniele Pezzati, Davide Ghinolfi, Laura Crocetti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/life15020254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of de novo kidney tumors (DKTs) after liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to previous transplant surgery and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity. Minimally invasive renal-sparing strategies like robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) are favored, but a transperitoneal approach may be limited by the previous transplant surgery and the location of the DKT; in such cases, CT-guided cryoablation may be an alternative option. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare RPN and cryoablation for the treatment of DKT in LT recipients. The primary endpoints were the efficacy (R0 resection in RPN, absence of the tumor at first follow-up for cryoablation) and the safety of the procedures (postoperative morbidity and increase in creatine level). The periprocedural costs and the oncologic efficacy (recurrence and overall survival) were the secondary endpoints. Twelve LT recipients (91.7% males, mean age 65 years) underwent RPN (n = 6) or cryoablation (n = 6) for DKT; the median interval between LT and diagnosis of DKT was 142.5 vs. 117.5 months, respectively. Efficacy was obtained in all patients after RPN and cryoablation. Postoperative morbidity was 16.7% in each group, and the postoperative increase in creatinine values was similar. Hospital stay was shorter following cryoablation vs. RPN (3.1 vs. 6.7 days; <i>p</i> = 0.03). The mean procedural costs were higher for RPN. There was no mortality and none of the patients had signs of recurrence after a median follow-up of 40.5 months. Both RPN and CT-guided cryoablation were safe and effective for the treatment of selected patients with DKT after LT. When applicable, cryoablation may be cost-effective and provide faster recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life-Basel\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020254\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于先前的移植手术和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)相关的肾毒性,肝移植(LT)后新发肾肿瘤(DKTs)的管理具有挑战性。微创肾保留策略,如机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RPN)受到青睐,但经腹膜入路可能受到先前移植手术和DKT位置的限制;在这种情况下,ct引导下的冷冻消融可能是另一种选择。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们旨在比较RPN和冷冻消融治疗LT受体DKT的效果。主要终点是疗效(RPN的R0切除,首次随访时冷冻消融没有肿瘤)和手术的安全性(术后发病率和肌酸水平的增加)。围手术期成本和肿瘤疗效(复发和总生存期)是次要终点。12名肝移植受者(91.7%男性,平均年龄65岁)接受了RPN (n = 6)或冷冻消融(n = 6)治疗DKT;从LT到诊断DKT的中位间隔时间分别为142.5个月和117.5个月。所有患者经RPN和冷冻消融后均获得疗效。两组术后发病率为16.7%,术后肌酐值升高相似。与RPN相比,冷冻消融后住院时间更短(3.1天对6.7天;P = 0.03)。RPN的平均程序费用较高。在中位随访40.5个月后,无患者死亡,无复发迹象。RPN和ct引导下的冷冻消融对于lt后DKT患者的治疗都是安全有效的。在适用的情况下,冷冻消融可能具有成本效益并提供更快的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transabdominal Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and CT-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation for the Treatment of De Novo Kidney Tumors After Liver Transplantation.

The management of de novo kidney tumors (DKTs) after liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to previous transplant surgery and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity. Minimally invasive renal-sparing strategies like robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) are favored, but a transperitoneal approach may be limited by the previous transplant surgery and the location of the DKT; in such cases, CT-guided cryoablation may be an alternative option. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare RPN and cryoablation for the treatment of DKT in LT recipients. The primary endpoints were the efficacy (R0 resection in RPN, absence of the tumor at first follow-up for cryoablation) and the safety of the procedures (postoperative morbidity and increase in creatine level). The periprocedural costs and the oncologic efficacy (recurrence and overall survival) were the secondary endpoints. Twelve LT recipients (91.7% males, mean age 65 years) underwent RPN (n = 6) or cryoablation (n = 6) for DKT; the median interval between LT and diagnosis of DKT was 142.5 vs. 117.5 months, respectively. Efficacy was obtained in all patients after RPN and cryoablation. Postoperative morbidity was 16.7% in each group, and the postoperative increase in creatinine values was similar. Hospital stay was shorter following cryoablation vs. RPN (3.1 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.03). The mean procedural costs were higher for RPN. There was no mortality and none of the patients had signs of recurrence after a median follow-up of 40.5 months. Both RPN and CT-guided cryoablation were safe and effective for the treatment of selected patients with DKT after LT. When applicable, cryoablation may be cost-effective and provide faster recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Kim et al. The p53-Driven Anticancer Effect of Ribes fasciculatum Extract on AGS Gastric Cancer Cells. Life 2022, 12, 303. Effect of Plyometric Jump Training on Vertical Jump Indicators and Performance-Related General Physical Fitness in Rugby Players: A Systematic Review. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Refractory Cardiac Arrest: Current Evidence, Clinical Pathways and Future Directions. Exercise-Induced Hypertension Is Associated with Cardiac Remodeling in Middle-Aged Male Long-Distance Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study. Anemia Secondary to Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Requiring Blood Transfusion in the Reproductive Age Group-A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1