水下内镜下粘膜下解剖治疗大的无带蒂结直肠息肉

IF 24.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gut Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2025-334995
Roberto de Sire, Antonio Capogreco, Davide Massimi, Ludovico Alfarone, Luca Brandaleone, Vincenzo Vadalà, Francesco Minini, Spadaccini Marco, Antonio Facciorusso, Asma Alkandari, Pradeep Bhandari, Cesare Hassan, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Repici
{"title":"水下内镜下粘膜下解剖治疗大的无带蒂结直肠息肉","authors":"Roberto de Sire, Antonio Capogreco, Davide Massimi, Ludovico Alfarone, Luca Brandaleone, Vincenzo Vadalà, Francesco Minini, Spadaccini Marco, Antonio Facciorusso, Asma Alkandari, Pradeep Bhandari, Cesare Hassan, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Repici","doi":"10.1136/gutjnl-2025-334995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underwater endoscopic resections have emerged as promising alternatives to the conventional techniques for the treatment of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps; this may also apply to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using saline. This retrospective study uses a propensity score-matched analysis of 82/208 such lesions treated during a 3-year period. Underwater ESD using saline improved R0 resection rates (97.6% vs 82.9%), enhanced dissection speed (31.8 mm2/min vs 22.9 mm2/min) and reduced the use of haemostatic forceps for intraprocedural bleeding (0% vs 14.6%). We recommend this technique to be adopted to facilitate ESD for large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. ESD is a preferred technique for en bloc resection of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps or adenomas, offering high R0 resection and low recurrence rates.1 2 However, its adoption in Western countries remains limited due to technical complexity, long procedure times and associated adverse events.3 Underwater ESD, which replaces CO2 insufflation with a saline-filled environment, has been proposed to enhance visualisation, traction and submucosal dissection, improving procedural outcomes.4–6 Additionally, saline impedance allows prophylactic underwater vessel coagulation when swift coagulation (effect: 4.0; electrosurgical generator: VIO3, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH) is applied, improving submucosal vessel sealing to reduce intraprocedural bleeding.7–10 This retrospective study included all consecutive large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas treated by ESD from January 2021 to December 2023. Underwater ESD using saline was gradually and systematically implemented after January 2023. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older with large lesions (≥2 cm). Exclusion criteria were treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection, need for deeper resection (endoscopic intermuscular dissection or endoscopic full-thickness resection), or surgery, suspected sessile serrated lesions, inability to suspend anticoagulant therapy or to provide informed consent. Relevant clinical and endoscopic data were systematically collected in an electronic database. The procedures were conducted …","PeriodicalId":12825,"journal":{"name":"Gut","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps\",\"authors\":\"Roberto de Sire, Antonio Capogreco, Davide Massimi, Ludovico Alfarone, Luca Brandaleone, Vincenzo Vadalà, Francesco Minini, Spadaccini Marco, Antonio Facciorusso, Asma Alkandari, Pradeep Bhandari, Cesare Hassan, Roberta Maselli, Alessandro Repici\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/gutjnl-2025-334995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Underwater endoscopic resections have emerged as promising alternatives to the conventional techniques for the treatment of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps; this may also apply to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using saline. This retrospective study uses a propensity score-matched analysis of 82/208 such lesions treated during a 3-year period. Underwater ESD using saline improved R0 resection rates (97.6% vs 82.9%), enhanced dissection speed (31.8 mm2/min vs 22.9 mm2/min) and reduced the use of haemostatic forceps for intraprocedural bleeding (0% vs 14.6%). We recommend this technique to be adopted to facilitate ESD for large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. ESD is a preferred technique for en bloc resection of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps or adenomas, offering high R0 resection and low recurrence rates.1 2 However, its adoption in Western countries remains limited due to technical complexity, long procedure times and associated adverse events.3 Underwater ESD, which replaces CO2 insufflation with a saline-filled environment, has been proposed to enhance visualisation, traction and submucosal dissection, improving procedural outcomes.4–6 Additionally, saline impedance allows prophylactic underwater vessel coagulation when swift coagulation (effect: 4.0; electrosurgical generator: VIO3, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH) is applied, improving submucosal vessel sealing to reduce intraprocedural bleeding.7–10 This retrospective study included all consecutive large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas treated by ESD from January 2021 to December 2023. Underwater ESD using saline was gradually and systematically implemented after January 2023. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older with large lesions (≥2 cm). Exclusion criteria were treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection, need for deeper resection (endoscopic intermuscular dissection or endoscopic full-thickness resection), or surgery, suspected sessile serrated lesions, inability to suspend anticoagulant therapy or to provide informed consent. Relevant clinical and endoscopic data were systematically collected in an electronic database. The procedures were conducted …\",\"PeriodicalId\":12825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2025-334995\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2025-334995","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水下内镜切除已成为治疗大型(≥2厘米)无带蒂结肠直肠息肉的传统技术的有希望的替代方法;这也适用于使用生理盐水进行结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)。本回顾性研究采用倾向评分匹配分析,对3年期间治疗的82/208例此类病变进行分析。使用盐水的水下ESD提高了R0切除率(97.6%对82.9%),加快了剥离速度(31.8 mm2/min对22.9 mm2/min),减少了术中出血止血钳的使用(0%对14.6%)。我们建议采用这种技术,以促进ESD对大的非带蒂结直肠病变。ESD是大(≥2cm)无带蒂结肠直肠息肉或腺瘤整体切除的首选技术,具有高R0切除和低复发率。然而,由于技术复杂、手术时间长和相关的不良事件,它在西方国家的采用仍然有限水下静电放电(ESD),用充满盐水的环境代替CO2充气,可以增强可视化、牵引和粘膜下剥离,改善手术效果。4-6此外,在快速凝血时,盐水阻抗允许预防性水下血管凝血(效果:4.0;电手术发生器:VIO3, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH),改善粘膜下血管密封,减少术中出血。7-10本回顾性研究纳入了2021年1月至2023年12月连续接受ESD治疗的所有大型无带蒂结直肠腺瘤。2023年1月起,逐步系统实施盐水水下ESD。符合条件的参与者是年龄在18岁或以上且有较大病变(≥2 cm)的成年人。排除标准为内镜下粘膜切除术,需要更深的切除(内镜下肌间剥离或内镜下全层切除),或手术,怀疑有无底锯齿状病变,无法暂停抗凝治疗或提供知情同意。相关的临床和内镜资料系统地收集在一个电子数据库中。程序已执行……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps
Underwater endoscopic resections have emerged as promising alternatives to the conventional techniques for the treatment of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps; this may also apply to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using saline. This retrospective study uses a propensity score-matched analysis of 82/208 such lesions treated during a 3-year period. Underwater ESD using saline improved R0 resection rates (97.6% vs 82.9%), enhanced dissection speed (31.8 mm2/min vs 22.9 mm2/min) and reduced the use of haemostatic forceps for intraprocedural bleeding (0% vs 14.6%). We recommend this technique to be adopted to facilitate ESD for large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. ESD is a preferred technique for en bloc resection of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps or adenomas, offering high R0 resection and low recurrence rates.1 2 However, its adoption in Western countries remains limited due to technical complexity, long procedure times and associated adverse events.3 Underwater ESD, which replaces CO2 insufflation with a saline-filled environment, has been proposed to enhance visualisation, traction and submucosal dissection, improving procedural outcomes.4–6 Additionally, saline impedance allows prophylactic underwater vessel coagulation when swift coagulation (effect: 4.0; electrosurgical generator: VIO3, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH) is applied, improving submucosal vessel sealing to reduce intraprocedural bleeding.7–10 This retrospective study included all consecutive large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas treated by ESD from January 2021 to December 2023. Underwater ESD using saline was gradually and systematically implemented after January 2023. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older with large lesions (≥2 cm). Exclusion criteria were treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection, need for deeper resection (endoscopic intermuscular dissection or endoscopic full-thickness resection), or surgery, suspected sessile serrated lesions, inability to suspend anticoagulant therapy or to provide informed consent. Relevant clinical and endoscopic data were systematically collected in an electronic database. The procedures were conducted …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gut
Gut 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
284
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Gut is a renowned international journal specializing in gastroenterology and hepatology, known for its high-quality clinical research covering the alimentary tract, liver, biliary tree, and pancreas. It offers authoritative and current coverage across all aspects of gastroenterology and hepatology, featuring articles on emerging disease mechanisms and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches authored by leading experts. As the flagship journal of BMJ's gastroenterology portfolio, Gut is accompanied by two companion journals: Frontline Gastroenterology, focusing on education and practice-oriented papers, and BMJ Open Gastroenterology for open access original research.
期刊最新文献
Vascular divide: how the portal milieu shapes neutrophil activation and remote organ damage. SPP1+ macrophages facilitate the differentiation and maturation of regulatory T cells in tumour-draining lymph nodes of colorectal cancer. Hepatitis B immunoglobulins after liver transplantation: essential early, optional later? Microbiota and metabolites modulation of cancer stem cells and chemotherapy sensitivity. Dual mechanism of immune escape shapes the genetic and immunogenic landscape of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal tumours.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1