反馈和工作记忆在目标相关监测和目标修订中的作用

IF 5.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102108
Maria Theobald , Garvin Brod
{"title":"反馈和工作记忆在目标相关监测和目标修订中的作用","authors":"Maria Theobald ,&nbsp;Garvin Brod","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Goal revision in response to performance feedback is a highly important self-regulatory process. A central requirement for goal revision is the ability of learners to accurately judge their performance relative to their goals, i.e., goal-related monitoring. However, the determinants of accurate goal-related monitoring and goal revision remain poorly understood. School children may have particular difficulties in accurately monitoring their goals and performance and revising their goals accordingly.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The study (1) examined the determinants of accurate goal-related monitoring and adaptive goal revision and (2) tested feedback as a means of promoting accurate goal-related monitoring and adaptive goal revision in elementary and early secondary school children.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Eight-to eleven-year-old children (<em>n</em> = 106) participated in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Children participated in a series of quizzes. They set performance goals before each task and then rated their performance. Children either received feedback on their goals and task performance (feedback condition), or they received no feedback (no feedback condition).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Children generally overestimated their performance, especially those with lower working memory. Children in the feedback (vs. no feedback) condition (1) became more accurate in their goal-related monitoring and (2) revised their goals more adaptively over the course of the experiment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results highlight the role of interindividual differences in working memory for goal-related monitoring and goal revision, and underscore the effectiveness of feedback in promoting these metacognitive skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102108"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of feedback and working memory for goal-related monitoring and goal revision\",\"authors\":\"Maria Theobald ,&nbsp;Garvin Brod\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Goal revision in response to performance feedback is a highly important self-regulatory process. A central requirement for goal revision is the ability of learners to accurately judge their performance relative to their goals, i.e., goal-related monitoring. However, the determinants of accurate goal-related monitoring and goal revision remain poorly understood. School children may have particular difficulties in accurately monitoring their goals and performance and revising their goals accordingly.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The study (1) examined the determinants of accurate goal-related monitoring and adaptive goal revision and (2) tested feedback as a means of promoting accurate goal-related monitoring and adaptive goal revision in elementary and early secondary school children.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Eight-to eleven-year-old children (<em>n</em> = 106) participated in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Children participated in a series of quizzes. They set performance goals before each task and then rated their performance. Children either received feedback on their goals and task performance (feedback condition), or they received no feedback (no feedback condition).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Children generally overestimated their performance, especially those with lower working memory. Children in the feedback (vs. no feedback) condition (1) became more accurate in their goal-related monitoring and (2) revised their goals more adaptively over the course of the experiment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results highlight the role of interindividual differences in working memory for goal-related monitoring and goal revision, and underscore the effectiveness of feedback in promoting these metacognitive skills.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000325\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据绩效反馈进行目标修正是一个非常重要的自我调节过程。目标修正的一个核心要求是学习者能够准确地判断自己相对于目标的表现,即与目标相关的监控。然而,准确的目标相关监测和目标修订的决定因素仍然知之甚少。学龄儿童在准确监测他们的目标和表现以及相应地修改他们的目标方面可能有特别的困难。目的本研究(1)考察了准确目标相关监测和适应性目标修订的决定因素;(2)检验了反馈作为促进中小学生准确目标相关监测和适应性目标修订的手段。样本8 - 11岁的儿童(n = 106)参加了这项研究。方法儿童参加一系列测验。他们在每项任务之前设定绩效目标,然后对自己的表现进行评分。孩子们要么收到关于他们的目标和任务表现的反馈(反馈条件),要么没有收到反馈(没有反馈条件)。结果儿童普遍高估自己的表现,尤其是工作记忆较差的儿童。在反馈(与无反馈)条件下的儿童(1)在与目标相关的监控方面变得更加准确,(2)在实验过程中更能适应地修改目标。结论工作记忆的个体间差异在目标相关监测和目标修正中的作用,并强调了反馈对这些元认知技能的促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of feedback and working memory for goal-related monitoring and goal revision

Background

Goal revision in response to performance feedback is a highly important self-regulatory process. A central requirement for goal revision is the ability of learners to accurately judge their performance relative to their goals, i.e., goal-related monitoring. However, the determinants of accurate goal-related monitoring and goal revision remain poorly understood. School children may have particular difficulties in accurately monitoring their goals and performance and revising their goals accordingly.

Aims

The study (1) examined the determinants of accurate goal-related monitoring and adaptive goal revision and (2) tested feedback as a means of promoting accurate goal-related monitoring and adaptive goal revision in elementary and early secondary school children.

Sample

Eight-to eleven-year-old children (n = 106) participated in the study.

Methods

Children participated in a series of quizzes. They set performance goals before each task and then rated their performance. Children either received feedback on their goals and task performance (feedback condition), or they received no feedback (no feedback condition).

Results

Children generally overestimated their performance, especially those with lower working memory. Children in the feedback (vs. no feedback) condition (1) became more accurate in their goal-related monitoring and (2) revised their goals more adaptively over the course of the experiment.

Conclusions

The results highlight the role of interindividual differences in working memory for goal-related monitoring and goal revision, and underscore the effectiveness of feedback in promoting these metacognitive skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Using board games as a protective tool: Effects on cognitive, social, emotional, behavioural outcomes, and learning How teaching shapes motivations to learn across middle school subjects Can we professionally develop teachers’ visual attention? Video-based professional development of early childhood teachers’ in-action noticing during language-stimulating interactions: A mobile eye-tracking study We are stronger together: The impact of dialogic reading with robots on children's mathematical language and numeracy skills Fostering self-regulated learning through adaptive learning technology: A differentiated perspective on the role of feedback
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1