前列腺癌幸存者神经调节的生活质量结局

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.100
Bryn Launer, Melissa Kaufman
{"title":"前列腺癌幸存者神经调节的生活质量结局","authors":"Bryn Launer,&nbsp;Melissa Kaufman","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Prostate cancer (PCa) survivors experience significant impact on urinary function following treatment. While therapies to address stress urinary incontinence in PCa survivors have been well described, there is a dearth of information regarding urgency urinary incontinence and the role of sacral neuromodulation (SNM). This study aims to characterize outcomes for PCa survivors with medication refractory lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent SNM with Interstim.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 50 male patients, all PCa survivors, from 12 institutions were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients were consented as part of the post-market Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry. Demographic information was collected, as well as outcomes data measured by the Patient Gobal Impression of Improvement (PGII) scale over multiple follow-up visits up to 96 months after SNM device placement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients were an average age of 73 at time of SNM device placement, with average BMI of 29. Ninety percent (45/50) were white, 8% (4/50) were Black or African American, and 2% (1/50) identified as Hispanic or Latino. Most patients (88%, 44/50) were enrolled following initial device placement, with 8% (4/50) undergoing replacement procedures. Forty-three percent (26/40) had previously undergone prostate surgery, and 51% (15/29) had previously undergone prostate radiation. The most common indication for device use was urinary urgency incontinence (54%, 27/50), followed by urinary urgency/frequency (24%, 12/50).</div><div>Mean follow up was 32 months, median follow up was 21 months, with a range from 0 months to 96 months. The majority reported improvement in symptoms as measured by the PGII at each follow up visit, with 73% (11/15) reporting improvement at 6 months, 83% (10/12) at 12 months, and 83% (5/6) at 72 months (Fig. 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of SNM in PCa survivors shows durable symptom improvement in this small cohort with mean follow up of almost 3 years. SNM should be considered as a treatment modality for patients with mixed LUTS after PCa treatment, aided by functional diagnosis with urodynamics. This study presents an opportunity for investigation into prospective studies to enhance our specificity for treatment to optimize outcomes in PCa survivors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 3","pages":"Page 40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES WITH NEUROMODULATION IN PROSTATE CANCER SURVIVORS\",\"authors\":\"Bryn Launer,&nbsp;Melissa Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Prostate cancer (PCa) survivors experience significant impact on urinary function following treatment. While therapies to address stress urinary incontinence in PCa survivors have been well described, there is a dearth of information regarding urgency urinary incontinence and the role of sacral neuromodulation (SNM). This study aims to characterize outcomes for PCa survivors with medication refractory lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent SNM with Interstim.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 50 male patients, all PCa survivors, from 12 institutions were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients were consented as part of the post-market Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry. Demographic information was collected, as well as outcomes data measured by the Patient Gobal Impression of Improvement (PGII) scale over multiple follow-up visits up to 96 months after SNM device placement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients were an average age of 73 at time of SNM device placement, with average BMI of 29. Ninety percent (45/50) were white, 8% (4/50) were Black or African American, and 2% (1/50) identified as Hispanic or Latino. Most patients (88%, 44/50) were enrolled following initial device placement, with 8% (4/50) undergoing replacement procedures. Forty-three percent (26/40) had previously undergone prostate surgery, and 51% (15/29) had previously undergone prostate radiation. The most common indication for device use was urinary urgency incontinence (54%, 27/50), followed by urinary urgency/frequency (24%, 12/50).</div><div>Mean follow up was 32 months, median follow up was 21 months, with a range from 0 months to 96 months. The majority reported improvement in symptoms as measured by the PGII at each follow up visit, with 73% (11/15) reporting improvement at 6 months, 83% (10/12) at 12 months, and 83% (5/6) at 72 months (Fig. 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of SNM in PCa survivors shows durable symptom improvement in this small cohort with mean follow up of almost 3 years. SNM should be considered as a treatment modality for patients with mixed LUTS after PCa treatment, aided by functional diagnosis with urodynamics. This study presents an opportunity for investigation into prospective studies to enhance our specificity for treatment to optimize outcomes in PCa survivors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Page 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008809\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌(PCa)幸存者在治疗后对泌尿功能有显著影响。虽然治疗前列腺癌幸存者压力性尿失禁的方法已经有了很好的描述,但关于急迫性尿失禁和骶神经调节(SNM)的作用的信息缺乏。本研究的目的是描述有药物难治性下尿路症状的前列腺癌幸存者在Interstim下接受SNM治疗的结果。方法回顾性分析来自12所医院的50例男性前列腺癌患者。患者同意作为上市后美敦力产品监督注册的一部分。收集了人口统计信息,以及在SNM装置放置后长达96个月的多次随访中通过患者总体改善印象(PGII)量表测量的结果数据。结果患者放置SNM装置时平均年龄73岁,平均BMI为29。90%(45/50)为白人,8%(4/50)为黑人或非裔美国人,2%(1/50)为西班牙裔或拉丁裔。大多数患者(88%,44/50)在初始装置放置后入组,8%(4/50)接受替代手术。43%(26/40)曾接受过前列腺手术,51%(15/29)曾接受过前列腺放疗。器械使用最常见的指征是尿急失禁(54%,27/50),其次是尿急/尿频(24%,12/50)。平均随访32个月,中位随访21个月,随访时间0 ~ 96个月。大多数患者在每次随访时均通过PGII报告症状改善,73%(11/15)的患者在6个月时报告症状改善,83%(10/12)的患者在12个月时报告症状改善,83%(5/6)的患者在72个月时报告症状改善(图1)。结论在这个平均随访近3年的小队列中,PCa幸存者的SNM表现出持久的症状改善。在尿动力学功能诊断的辅助下,应考虑将SNM作为PCa治疗后混合性LUTS患者的治疗方式。本研究为前瞻性研究提供了一个机会,以提高我们治疗的特异性,以优化前列腺癌幸存者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES WITH NEUROMODULATION IN PROSTATE CANCER SURVIVORS

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) survivors experience significant impact on urinary function following treatment. While therapies to address stress urinary incontinence in PCa survivors have been well described, there is a dearth of information regarding urgency urinary incontinence and the role of sacral neuromodulation (SNM). This study aims to characterize outcomes for PCa survivors with medication refractory lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent SNM with Interstim.

Methods

A total of 50 male patients, all PCa survivors, from 12 institutions were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients were consented as part of the post-market Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry. Demographic information was collected, as well as outcomes data measured by the Patient Gobal Impression of Improvement (PGII) scale over multiple follow-up visits up to 96 months after SNM device placement.

Results

Patients were an average age of 73 at time of SNM device placement, with average BMI of 29. Ninety percent (45/50) were white, 8% (4/50) were Black or African American, and 2% (1/50) identified as Hispanic or Latino. Most patients (88%, 44/50) were enrolled following initial device placement, with 8% (4/50) undergoing replacement procedures. Forty-three percent (26/40) had previously undergone prostate surgery, and 51% (15/29) had previously undergone prostate radiation. The most common indication for device use was urinary urgency incontinence (54%, 27/50), followed by urinary urgency/frequency (24%, 12/50).
Mean follow up was 32 months, median follow up was 21 months, with a range from 0 months to 96 months. The majority reported improvement in symptoms as measured by the PGII at each follow up visit, with 73% (11/15) reporting improvement at 6 months, 83% (10/12) at 12 months, and 83% (5/6) at 72 months (Fig. 1).

Conclusions

Use of SNM in PCa survivors shows durable symptom improvement in this small cohort with mean follow up of almost 3 years. SNM should be considered as a treatment modality for patients with mixed LUTS after PCa treatment, aided by functional diagnosis with urodynamics. This study presents an opportunity for investigation into prospective studies to enhance our specificity for treatment to optimize outcomes in PCa survivors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Ileal conduit vs. orthotopic ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term renal function New CPT codes for prostate biopsy improve alignment of reimbursement with evidence-based practice Adverse pathology and low tumor volume in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: Toward safe expansion of active surveillance and focal therapy Diagnostic performance of urinary tumor DNA in urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Deep and durable prostate-specific antigen response following comprehensive involved site radiotherapy for prostate cancer oligometastases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1