麝香保心丸治疗心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、Ⅳ期临床试验

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Phytomedicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.phymed.2025.156556
Zhiqing He , Na Li , Wei Zhang , Xianhao Meng , Jingping Wang , Lihong Gong , Bing Liu , Mingqi Zheng , Zhuo Shang , Jianjiang Xu , Piqiao Jiang , Qingxia Zhao , Boning Xu , Chun Liang
{"title":"麝香保心丸治疗心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、Ⅳ期临床试验","authors":"Zhiqing He ,&nbsp;Na Li ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xianhao Meng ,&nbsp;Jingping Wang ,&nbsp;Lihong Gong ,&nbsp;Bing Liu ,&nbsp;Mingqi Zheng ,&nbsp;Zhuo Shang ,&nbsp;Jianjiang Xu ,&nbsp;Piqiao Jiang ,&nbsp;Qingxia Zhao ,&nbsp;Boning Xu ,&nbsp;Chun Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.phymed.2025.156556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Solid evidence generated from large studies supporting the recommendation of Shexiang Baoxin Pill (MUSKARDIA) as a promising treatment for angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) populations is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUSKARDIA in patients with ANOCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IV trial, we enrolled 239 patients with ANOCA at 11 centers across China between May 2021 and July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MUSKARDIA or placebo (orally 4 pills thrice daily) based on conventional treatment for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in angina-related outcomes, assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores for the treatment groups at week 12.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 239 randomized patients with ANOCA, 236 (MUSKARDIA group, <em>n</em> = 117; placebo group, <em>n</em> = 119) completed treatment and endpoint assessments. At week 12, patients in the MUSKARDIA group showed better angina-related outcomes, with a more rapid increase in SAQ scores, than those in the placebo group (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Statistically significant differences favoring MUSKARDIA over placebo were observed for change in angina attack frequency compared with baseline at week 12 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Meanwhile, according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina, the change in angina pectoris severity, compared with baseline, was significantly reduced in MUSKARDIA group compared with placebo group at week 12 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). The percentage of patients who did not use sublingual nitroglycerin was noticeably higher in MUSKARDIA group than that in placebo group (84.16 % <em>vs.</em> 58.33 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial firstly confirmed that MUSKARDIA was an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with ANOCA in clinical settings. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04897126).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20212,"journal":{"name":"Phytomedicine","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 156556"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ⅳ clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqing He ,&nbsp;Na Li ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xianhao Meng ,&nbsp;Jingping Wang ,&nbsp;Lihong Gong ,&nbsp;Bing Liu ,&nbsp;Mingqi Zheng ,&nbsp;Zhuo Shang ,&nbsp;Jianjiang Xu ,&nbsp;Piqiao Jiang ,&nbsp;Qingxia Zhao ,&nbsp;Boning Xu ,&nbsp;Chun Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phymed.2025.156556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Solid evidence generated from large studies supporting the recommendation of Shexiang Baoxin Pill (MUSKARDIA) as a promising treatment for angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) populations is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUSKARDIA in patients with ANOCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IV trial, we enrolled 239 patients with ANOCA at 11 centers across China between May 2021 and July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MUSKARDIA or placebo (orally 4 pills thrice daily) based on conventional treatment for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in angina-related outcomes, assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores for the treatment groups at week 12.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 239 randomized patients with ANOCA, 236 (MUSKARDIA group, <em>n</em> = 117; placebo group, <em>n</em> = 119) completed treatment and endpoint assessments. At week 12, patients in the MUSKARDIA group showed better angina-related outcomes, with a more rapid increase in SAQ scores, than those in the placebo group (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Statistically significant differences favoring MUSKARDIA over placebo were observed for change in angina attack frequency compared with baseline at week 12 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Meanwhile, according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina, the change in angina pectoris severity, compared with baseline, was significantly reduced in MUSKARDIA group compared with placebo group at week 12 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). The percentage of patients who did not use sublingual nitroglycerin was noticeably higher in MUSKARDIA group than that in placebo group (84.16 % <em>vs.</em> 58.33 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial firstly confirmed that MUSKARDIA was an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with ANOCA in clinical settings. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04897126).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phytomedicine\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 156556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phytomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944711325001965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944711325001965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推荐麝香保心丸(MUSKARDIA)作为治疗心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉(ANOCA)人群的有希望的治疗方法,缺乏大型研究提供的可靠证据。目的评价MUSKARDIA治疗ANOCA的疗效和安全性。在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的IV期试验中,研究人员于2021年5月至2023年7月在中国11个中心招募了239名ANOCA患者。在常规治疗的基础上,患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受MUSKARDIA或安慰剂(口服4粒,每日3次),持续12周。主要终点是心绞痛相关结果的变化,在第12周使用西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)评分对治疗组进行评估。结果239例ANOCA患者中,236例(MUSKARDIA组,n = 117;安慰剂组(n = 119)完成了治疗和终点评估。在第12周,与安慰剂组相比,MUSKARDIA组患者表现出更好的心绞痛相关结果,SAQ评分增加更快(p <;0.0001)。与第12周基线相比,在心绞痛发作频率的变化方面,MUSKARDIA与安慰剂有统计学上的显著差异(p <;0.0001)。同时,根据加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级,在第12周,与安慰剂组相比,MUSKARDIA组心绞痛严重程度的变化与基线相比显著降低(p <;0.0001)。MUSKARDIA组不使用舌下硝酸甘油的患者比例明显高于安慰剂组(84.16% vs. 58.33%;p & lt;0.001)。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异,均未发生严重不良事件。结论:这项随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验首次证实了MUSKARDIA在临床环境中是一种有效、安全、耐受性良好的治疗ANOCA患者的药物。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04897126)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of Shexiang Baoxin Pill in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ⅳ clinical trial

Introduction

Solid evidence generated from large studies supporting the recommendation of Shexiang Baoxin Pill (MUSKARDIA) as a promising treatment for angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) populations is lacking.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MUSKARDIA in patients with ANOCA.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IV trial, we enrolled 239 patients with ANOCA at 11 centers across China between May 2021 and July 2023. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive MUSKARDIA or placebo (orally 4 pills thrice daily) based on conventional treatment for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in angina-related outcomes, assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores for the treatment groups at week 12.

Results

Among 239 randomized patients with ANOCA, 236 (MUSKARDIA group, n = 117; placebo group, n = 119) completed treatment and endpoint assessments. At week 12, patients in the MUSKARDIA group showed better angina-related outcomes, with a more rapid increase in SAQ scores, than those in the placebo group (all p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences favoring MUSKARDIA over placebo were observed for change in angina attack frequency compared with baseline at week 12 (p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina, the change in angina pectoris severity, compared with baseline, was significantly reduced in MUSKARDIA group compared with placebo group at week 12 (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who did not use sublingual nitroglycerin was noticeably higher in MUSKARDIA group than that in placebo group (84.16 % vs. 58.33 %; p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, and no serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial firstly confirmed that MUSKARDIA was an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with ANOCA in clinical settings. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04897126).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phytomedicine
Phytomedicine 医学-药学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
670
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: Phytomedicine is a therapy-oriented journal that publishes innovative studies on the efficacy, safety, quality, and mechanisms of action of specified plant extracts, phytopharmaceuticals, and their isolated constituents. This includes clinical, pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological studies of herbal medicinal products, preparations, and purified compounds with defined and consistent quality, ensuring reproducible pharmacological activity. Founded in 1994, Phytomedicine aims to focus and stimulate research in this field and establish internationally accepted scientific standards for pharmacological studies, proof of clinical efficacy, and safety of phytomedicines.
期刊最新文献
Asperosaponin VI ameliorates osteoporosis via skeletal muscle-derived FGF-2-mediated osteoblast differentiation Preclinical investigation and clinical trials of Red ginseng as an immunomodulator: a narrative review from 2015 to 2025 Targeting oncogenic signaling pathways in head and neck cancer using nano-phytomedicine: Molecular insights and therapeutic potential Bergenin, a bioactive compound from Bergenia purpurascens, ameliorates psoriasis by targeting γδT17 cells via PPARγ-mediated PROX1 ubiquitination and degradation Chinese authentic herbal medicine Ganhuangcao from Southwest China mitigates influenza virus infection by inhibiting the host JAK2/STAT1 signaling pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1