统计教学在英国和爱尔兰牙科学校本科课程概述

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Dental Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1038/s41415-024-8232-8
Sam Leary, Neil Cook, Jing Kang
{"title":"统计教学在英国和爱尔兰牙科学校本科课程概述","authors":"Sam Leary, Neil Cook, Jing Kang","doi":"10.1038/s41415-024-8232-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The United Kingdom (UK) General Dental Council''s (GDC''s) learning outcomes for undergraduate dental students briefly mention critical appraisal but not statistics. Hence, wide variation in statistics teaching across the dental schools is likely but has not yet been well-documented. Methods A survey was conducted to capture the main features of each of the dental degrees in the 18 UK and Ireland dental schools in terms of statistics-related (standalone or as part of other courses/modules) teaching. Results Representatives from all 18 dental schools completed the survey. There were some similarities, such as most using teaching materials specifically developed for their school, and aiming to teach students to understand/interpret but not generate statistics. However, the number/type of staff delivering the teaching, student contact hours, number of statistical concepts taught, whether statistical theory/formulae/packages were used and inclusion in summative assessments varied extensively. Most reported that this teaching was negatively perceived by the students and many felt that changes were needed. Discussion and conclusion This comprehensive review of undergraduate dental statistics-related provision allows dental schools to compare and contrast their own teaching, which is very timely given the imminent need to implement a new GDC framework. Guidelines to encourage more standardised teaching should be developed to improve the ability of newly qualified dentists to practise evidence-based dentistry.","PeriodicalId":9229,"journal":{"name":"British Dental Journal","volume":"238 4","pages":"265-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-8232-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of statistics teaching within undergraduate programmes in UK and Ireland dental schools\",\"authors\":\"Sam Leary, Neil Cook, Jing Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41415-024-8232-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The United Kingdom (UK) General Dental Council''s (GDC''s) learning outcomes for undergraduate dental students briefly mention critical appraisal but not statistics. Hence, wide variation in statistics teaching across the dental schools is likely but has not yet been well-documented. Methods A survey was conducted to capture the main features of each of the dental degrees in the 18 UK and Ireland dental schools in terms of statistics-related (standalone or as part of other courses/modules) teaching. Results Representatives from all 18 dental schools completed the survey. There were some similarities, such as most using teaching materials specifically developed for their school, and aiming to teach students to understand/interpret but not generate statistics. However, the number/type of staff delivering the teaching, student contact hours, number of statistical concepts taught, whether statistical theory/formulae/packages were used and inclusion in summative assessments varied extensively. Most reported that this teaching was negatively perceived by the students and many felt that changes were needed. Discussion and conclusion This comprehensive review of undergraduate dental statistics-related provision allows dental schools to compare and contrast their own teaching, which is very timely given the imminent need to implement a new GDC framework. Guidelines to encourage more standardised teaching should be developed to improve the ability of newly qualified dentists to practise evidence-based dentistry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"238 4\",\"pages\":\"265-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-8232-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-8232-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-8232-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国牙科总委员会(GDC)对本科牙科学生的学习成果简要地提到了批判性评估,但没有统计数据。因此,在牙科学校统计学教学的广泛差异是可能的,但尚未得到很好的记录。方法对英国和爱尔兰18所牙科学校的每个牙科学位在统计学相关(独立或作为其他课程/模块的一部分)教学方面的主要特点进行调查。结果18所牙科学校均有代表完成调查。有一些相似之处,比如大多数学校使用专门为他们学校开发的教材,旨在教学生理解/解释而不是生成统计数据。然而,提供教学的工作人员的数量/类型、学生接触时间、教授的统计概念的数量、是否使用统计理论/公式/软件包以及是否纳入总结性评估的情况差别很大。大多数报告说,这种教学被学生消极地感知,许多人认为需要改变。对本科牙科统计学相关规定的全面审查,使牙科学校能够对自己的教学进行比较和对比,鉴于迫切需要实施新的GDC框架,这是非常及时的。应制定鼓励更标准化教学的指导方针,以提高新合格牙医实践循证牙科的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overview of statistics teaching within undergraduate programmes in UK and Ireland dental schools
Introduction The United Kingdom (UK) General Dental Council''s (GDC''s) learning outcomes for undergraduate dental students briefly mention critical appraisal but not statistics. Hence, wide variation in statistics teaching across the dental schools is likely but has not yet been well-documented. Methods A survey was conducted to capture the main features of each of the dental degrees in the 18 UK and Ireland dental schools in terms of statistics-related (standalone or as part of other courses/modules) teaching. Results Representatives from all 18 dental schools completed the survey. There were some similarities, such as most using teaching materials specifically developed for their school, and aiming to teach students to understand/interpret but not generate statistics. However, the number/type of staff delivering the teaching, student contact hours, number of statistical concepts taught, whether statistical theory/formulae/packages were used and inclusion in summative assessments varied extensively. Most reported that this teaching was negatively perceived by the students and many felt that changes were needed. Discussion and conclusion This comprehensive review of undergraduate dental statistics-related provision allows dental schools to compare and contrast their own teaching, which is very timely given the imminent need to implement a new GDC framework. Guidelines to encourage more standardised teaching should be developed to improve the ability of newly qualified dentists to practise evidence-based dentistry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Dental Journal
British Dental Journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1096
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The role of the BDJ is to inform its readers of ideas, opinions, developments and key issues in dentistry - clinical, practical and scientific - stimulating interest, debate and discussion amongst dentists of all disciplines. All papers published in the BDJ are subject to rigorous peer review.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: The BSSPD 2025 debate: sustainability of dentistry and prosthodontics – is this an emergency? Walking towards better physical and mental wellbeing Sweet trouble in the pulp: when diabetes hardens the heart of the tooth Advising patients with dental and oral soft tissue pain Free CPD for dental professionals Comprehensive AI reception management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1