系统审查在低收入和中等收入国家实施非气动防震服的障碍和促进因素:对全球卫生的教训。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681
Qin Xiang Ng, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Hiang Khoon Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Heta Kosonen, Jonas Karlström
{"title":"系统审查在低收入和中等收入国家实施非气动防震服的障碍和促进因素:对全球卫生的教训。","authors":"Qin Xiang Ng, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Hiang Khoon Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Heta Kosonen, Jonas Karlström","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading global cause of maternal mortality, particularly in rural and resource-poor settings where delays in care are common. Non-pneumatic antishock garments (NASGs) have been proposed as a temporising measure to reduce blood loss and improve survival rates. Despite positive outcomes from clinical trials, the uptake of the NASG has been slow and faced various implementation challenges. This review thus aims to identify and analyse the barriers and facilitators of NASG implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed to search for studies related to NASG use in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception up to August 2024. Grey literature was also reviewed. Two independent reviewers screened identified records using Covidence, assessing relevant studies for inclusion. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach structured around the CFIR's five domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies were reviewed. Common barriers included high initial procurement costs. Inadequate training and knowledge among healthcare providers were another obstacle, resulting in low confidence in the proper use of NASG. Logistical issues, such as inconsistent supply chains and difficulties in maintaining NASG devices, were highlighted, alongside the challenges posed by under-resourced health infrastructures. Facilitators included effective training programmes, support from health authorities, advocacy by local and national champions, and successful integration into clinical protocols and health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation experience of NASG in LMICs highlights important lessons for stakeholders in the global health space, with challenges such as high initial costs and inadequate training being common obstacles in LMICs. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators (eg, through comprehensive training, garnering local and international support and active sourcing for locally produced materials to reduce costs) across multilevel contexts influence implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of non-pneumatic antishock garments in low- and middle-income countries: lessons for global health.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Xiang Ng, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Hiang Khoon Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Heta Kosonen, Jonas Karlström\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading global cause of maternal mortality, particularly in rural and resource-poor settings where delays in care are common. Non-pneumatic antishock garments (NASGs) have been proposed as a temporising measure to reduce blood loss and improve survival rates. Despite positive outcomes from clinical trials, the uptake of the NASG has been slow and faced various implementation challenges. This review thus aims to identify and analyse the barriers and facilitators of NASG implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed to search for studies related to NASG use in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception up to August 2024. Grey literature was also reviewed. Two independent reviewers screened identified records using Covidence, assessing relevant studies for inclusion. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach structured around the CFIR's five domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies were reviewed. Common barriers included high initial procurement costs. Inadequate training and knowledge among healthcare providers were another obstacle, resulting in low confidence in the proper use of NASG. Logistical issues, such as inconsistent supply chains and difficulties in maintaining NASG devices, were highlighted, alongside the challenges posed by under-resourced health infrastructures. Facilitators included effective training programmes, support from health authorities, advocacy by local and national champions, and successful integration into clinical protocols and health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation experience of NASG in LMICs highlights important lessons for stakeholders in the global health space, with challenges such as high initial costs and inadequate training being common obstacles in LMICs. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators (eg, through comprehensive training, garnering local and international support and active sourcing for locally produced materials to reduce costs) across multilevel contexts influence implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产科出血是全球孕产妇死亡的主要原因,特别是在农村和资源贫乏的环境中,那里的护理延误是常见的。非气动防震服(NASGs)已被提出作为一种临时措施,以减少失血和提高存活率。尽管临床试验取得了积极的结果,但NASG的采用速度缓慢,并且面临着各种实施挑战。因此,本综述旨在利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)确定和分析低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)实施NASG的障碍和促进因素。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,制定了综合检索策略,检索Medline, Embase, CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2024年8月期间与NASG使用相关的研究。灰色文献也进行了回顾。两名独立审稿人使用covid - ence筛选已确定的记录,评估相关研究是否纳入。数据采用围绕CFIR的五个领域构建的叙述方法进行综合。结果:共回顾了17项研究。共同的障碍包括初始采购成本高。医疗保健提供者的培训和知识不足是另一个障碍,导致对正确使用NASG缺乏信心。与会者强调了后勤问题,如供应链不一致和维护NASG设备方面的困难,以及卫生基础设施资源不足带来的挑战。促进因素包括有效的培训规划、卫生当局的支持、地方和国家倡导者的倡导以及成功地纳入临床规程和卫生系统。结论:在低收入和中等收入国家实施国家健康评估的经验为全球卫生领域的利益攸关方提供了重要的经验教训,初始成本高和培训不足等挑战是低收入和中等收入国家的共同障碍。跨多个层面解决这些障碍和利用促进因素(例如,通过全面培训、获得当地和国际支持以及积极采购当地生产的材料以降低成本)会影响执行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of non-pneumatic antishock garments in low- and middle-income countries: lessons for global health.

Background: Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading global cause of maternal mortality, particularly in rural and resource-poor settings where delays in care are common. Non-pneumatic antishock garments (NASGs) have been proposed as a temporising measure to reduce blood loss and improve survival rates. Despite positive outcomes from clinical trials, the uptake of the NASG has been slow and faced various implementation challenges. This review thus aims to identify and analyse the barriers and facilitators of NASG implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed to search for studies related to NASG use in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception up to August 2024. Grey literature was also reviewed. Two independent reviewers screened identified records using Covidence, assessing relevant studies for inclusion. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach structured around the CFIR's five domains.

Results: A total of 17 studies were reviewed. Common barriers included high initial procurement costs. Inadequate training and knowledge among healthcare providers were another obstacle, resulting in low confidence in the proper use of NASG. Logistical issues, such as inconsistent supply chains and difficulties in maintaining NASG devices, were highlighted, alongside the challenges posed by under-resourced health infrastructures. Facilitators included effective training programmes, support from health authorities, advocacy by local and national champions, and successful integration into clinical protocols and health systems.

Conclusions: The implementation experience of NASG in LMICs highlights important lessons for stakeholders in the global health space, with challenges such as high initial costs and inadequate training being common obstacles in LMICs. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators (eg, through comprehensive training, garnering local and international support and active sourcing for locally produced materials to reduce costs) across multilevel contexts influence implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations affected by ongoing armed conflict: a scoping review. Air pollution, urban environmental quality and health expenditures: evidence from industrial cities in Iran. Beyond hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: positioning Africa for scalable uptake of innovative sickle cell therapies. The re-emergence of a data desert for maternal survival is a serious risk amid global health funding cuts. A new model for cervical cancer screening in Cambodian garment workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1