普通儿科病房外周置管的维护。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1177/11297298251322929
Hiro Nakao, Yusuke Tokuda, Shintaro Morooka, Mitsuru Kubota
{"title":"普通儿科病房外周置管的维护。","authors":"Hiro Nakao, Yusuke Tokuda, Shintaro Morooka, Mitsuru Kubota","doi":"10.1177/11297298251322929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has emerged as a useful option for long-term intravenous access in children, which has been increasingly required with the advancements in pediatric care. Long-term maintenance of PICCs is important for their functions, but little is known about this. We aimed to describe the PICC dwelling time in general pediatric wards, taking both complications and intentional routine removal into consideration, and explore the factors for long-term maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined the records of procedures performed by the pediatric PICC team between April 2020 and September 2023 at a children's hospital in Japan. We conducted a survival time analysis to depict PICC dwelling time and regression analyses to explore factors associated with successful PICC insertion and long-term maintenance of catheters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PICC team conducted 78 procedures during the study period, 66 (85%) achieved central venous access, and 57 (78%) of 73 inserted PICCs could be used until treatment completion. The most common indication was administration of antibiotics. Radioscopy was utilized in 18% of procedures. The median PICC survival time was 170 days, and the 75% PICC survival time was 52 days. Failure of PICC insertion was associated with the 4.5 Fr double catheter (odds ratio (OR), 0.16) and lower extremity puncture (OR, 0.24). Longer catheter survival was associated with the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC; hazard ratio (HR), 0.15), which was confirmed by additional multivariate analysis (HR, 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICCs could be used for several months in children until complications required removal. Single-lumen catheter insertion into the SVC might be associated with longer catheter survival. Developing appropriate methods to reach the SVC remains our task.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"2043-2052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheters in general pediatric wards.\",\"authors\":\"Hiro Nakao, Yusuke Tokuda, Shintaro Morooka, Mitsuru Kubota\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251322929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has emerged as a useful option for long-term intravenous access in children, which has been increasingly required with the advancements in pediatric care. Long-term maintenance of PICCs is important for their functions, but little is known about this. We aimed to describe the PICC dwelling time in general pediatric wards, taking both complications and intentional routine removal into consideration, and explore the factors for long-term maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined the records of procedures performed by the pediatric PICC team between April 2020 and September 2023 at a children's hospital in Japan. We conducted a survival time analysis to depict PICC dwelling time and regression analyses to explore factors associated with successful PICC insertion and long-term maintenance of catheters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PICC team conducted 78 procedures during the study period, 66 (85%) achieved central venous access, and 57 (78%) of 73 inserted PICCs could be used until treatment completion. The most common indication was administration of antibiotics. Radioscopy was utilized in 18% of procedures. The median PICC survival time was 170 days, and the 75% PICC survival time was 52 days. Failure of PICC insertion was associated with the 4.5 Fr double catheter (odds ratio (OR), 0.16) and lower extremity puncture (OR, 0.24). Longer catheter survival was associated with the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC; hazard ratio (HR), 0.15), which was confirmed by additional multivariate analysis (HR, 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICCs could be used for several months in children until complications required removal. Single-lumen catheter insertion into the SVC might be associated with longer catheter survival. Developing appropriate methods to reach the SVC remains our task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2043-2052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251322929\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251322929","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外周插入中心导管(PICC)已成为儿童长期静脉注射的一种有用选择,随着儿科护理的进步,对其的需求越来越大。picc的长期维护对其功能很重要,但对此知之甚少。我们的目的是描述PICC在普通儿科病房的停留时间,考虑并发症和故意常规切除,并探讨长期维持的因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了2020年4月至2023年9月在日本一家儿童医院儿科PICC团队进行的手术记录。我们进行了生存时间分析来描述PICC的停留时间,并进行了回归分析来探索PICC成功插入和导管长期维持的相关因素。结果:PICC团队在研究期间进行了78例手术,66例(85%)实现了中心静脉通路,73例插入的PICC中57例(78%)可以使用直到治疗完成。最常见的适应症是使用抗生素。18%的手术采用放射检查。PICC的中位生存时间为170天,75% PICC的生存时间为52天。PICC插入失败与4.5 Fr双导管(优势比(OR), 0.16)和下肢穿刺(OR, 0.24)相关。较长的导管存活时间与导管尖端在上腔静脉(SVC;风险比(HR), 0.15),通过额外的多变量分析(HR, 0.14)证实了这一点。结论:PICCs可以在儿童中使用数月,直到出现并发症需要移除。单腔导管插入SVC可能与导管存活时间延长有关。开发达到SVC的适当方法仍然是我们的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheters in general pediatric wards.

Background: The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has emerged as a useful option for long-term intravenous access in children, which has been increasingly required with the advancements in pediatric care. Long-term maintenance of PICCs is important for their functions, but little is known about this. We aimed to describe the PICC dwelling time in general pediatric wards, taking both complications and intentional routine removal into consideration, and explore the factors for long-term maintenance.

Methods: We retrospectively examined the records of procedures performed by the pediatric PICC team between April 2020 and September 2023 at a children's hospital in Japan. We conducted a survival time analysis to depict PICC dwelling time and regression analyses to explore factors associated with successful PICC insertion and long-term maintenance of catheters.

Results: The PICC team conducted 78 procedures during the study period, 66 (85%) achieved central venous access, and 57 (78%) of 73 inserted PICCs could be used until treatment completion. The most common indication was administration of antibiotics. Radioscopy was utilized in 18% of procedures. The median PICC survival time was 170 days, and the 75% PICC survival time was 52 days. Failure of PICC insertion was associated with the 4.5 Fr double catheter (odds ratio (OR), 0.16) and lower extremity puncture (OR, 0.24). Longer catheter survival was associated with the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC; hazard ratio (HR), 0.15), which was confirmed by additional multivariate analysis (HR, 0.14).

Conclusions: PICCs could be used for several months in children until complications required removal. Single-lumen catheter insertion into the SVC might be associated with longer catheter survival. Developing appropriate methods to reach the SVC remains our task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative volume status in vascular access creation: A despised influence? Improved arterio-arterial grafts as a novel approach for hemodialysis in poor access patients: A case report. Bailout management of pull-line entrapment following Viabahn stent deployment: A case report. Context and outcomes in distal radial artery sampling: A comparative perspective. Staged endovascular management for non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1