家庭参与干预预防重症监护病房谵妄的有效性:一项系统综述

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103976
Marli Lopo Vitorino , Adriana Henriques , Graça Melo , Helga Rafael Henriques
{"title":"家庭参与干预预防重症监护病房谵妄的有效性:一项系统综述","authors":"Marli Lopo Vitorino ,&nbsp;Adriana Henriques ,&nbsp;Graça Melo ,&nbsp;Helga Rafael Henriques","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To review the effect of family participation interventions in preventing delirium in Intensive Care Units (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the “Synthesis Without Meta-analysis” guidelines. The search was performed using the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> databases in April 2024. Eligibility criteria included patients admitted to Intensive Care Units, aged 18 or older exposed to risk factors for delirium, and with family members present; studies about family intervention to prevent delirium, that considered family as a partner in care and included interventions; studies that quantitatively assessed the effect of measures on the incidence and duration of delirium; interventional studies. Two authors independently applied these criteria using the Rayyan® application, assessing study quality with Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies were included, involving 33,232 patients. A <em>meta</em>-analysis was not feasible due to the highly heterogeneous results, but we concluded that the family participation interventions for delirium prevention were grouped into single-component and multi-component interventions. The single-component interventions, such as familiar voice messages, flexible visitation, and family presence, showed a favorable response in reducing delirium. The multicomponent interventions suggesting a positive effect included family visitation with professional-guided orientation; familiar voice messages for reorientation, newspaper reading, and nighttime eye patch use; sensory stimulation program; the ABCDEF bundle; the DyDel program; family education, emotional support, orientation training, cognitive stimulation, and ICU life care participation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Several family participation interventions, both single-component and multicomponent, have shown positive effects on outcomes in preventing delirium in ICU patients, particularly in reducing its incidence and duration.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><div>Identifying the family participation interventions that can prevent delirium allows the development of measures to minimize its occurrence in ICU.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of family participation interventions for the prevention of delirium in intensive care units: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Marli Lopo Vitorino ,&nbsp;Adriana Henriques ,&nbsp;Graça Melo ,&nbsp;Helga Rafael Henriques\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To review the effect of family participation interventions in preventing delirium in Intensive Care Units (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the “Synthesis Without Meta-analysis” guidelines. The search was performed using the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> databases in April 2024. Eligibility criteria included patients admitted to Intensive Care Units, aged 18 or older exposed to risk factors for delirium, and with family members present; studies about family intervention to prevent delirium, that considered family as a partner in care and included interventions; studies that quantitatively assessed the effect of measures on the incidence and duration of delirium; interventional studies. Two authors independently applied these criteria using the Rayyan® application, assessing study quality with Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies were included, involving 33,232 patients. A <em>meta</em>-analysis was not feasible due to the highly heterogeneous results, but we concluded that the family participation interventions for delirium prevention were grouped into single-component and multi-component interventions. The single-component interventions, such as familiar voice messages, flexible visitation, and family presence, showed a favorable response in reducing delirium. The multicomponent interventions suggesting a positive effect included family visitation with professional-guided orientation; familiar voice messages for reorientation, newspaper reading, and nighttime eye patch use; sensory stimulation program; the ABCDEF bundle; the DyDel program; family education, emotional support, orientation training, cognitive stimulation, and ICU life care participation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Several family participation interventions, both single-component and multicomponent, have shown positive effects on outcomes in preventing delirium in ICU patients, particularly in reducing its incidence and duration.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><div>Identifying the family participation interventions that can prevent delirium allows the development of measures to minimize its occurrence in ICU.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000370\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨家庭参与干预在重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄预防中的作用。方法本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目和“不进行荟萃分析的综合”指南。检索于2024年4月使用MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库进行。入选标准包括重症监护室收治的患者,年龄在18岁或以上,暴露于谵妄危险因素,并且有家庭成员在场;将家庭作为护理伙伴并纳入干预措施的谵妄预防的家庭干预研究;定量评估措施对谵妄发生率和持续时间影响的研究;介入研究。两位作者使用Rayyan®应用程序独立应用这些标准,使用Critical Appraisal Skills program工具评估研究质量。结果纳入14项研究,涉及33232例患者。由于结果高度异质性,荟萃分析不可行,但我们得出结论,家庭参与干预预防谵妄分为单成分和多成分干预。单组分干预,如熟悉的语音信息、灵活的探视和家人在场,在减少谵妄方面表现出良好的反应。多成分干预包括专业指导下的家庭探视;熟悉的语音信息,用于重新定位、阅读报纸和夜间使用眼罩;感官刺激方案;ABCDEF包;DyDel程序;家庭教育、情感支持、定向训练、认知刺激和ICU生活护理参与。结论多种家庭参与干预,包括单组分和多组分,对预防ICU患者谵妄的结局有积极作用,特别是在减少其发生率和持续时间方面。对临床实践的启示确定家庭参与干预可以预防谵妄,从而制定措施以尽量减少其在ICU的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of family participation interventions for the prevention of delirium in intensive care units: A systematic review

Aim

To review the effect of family participation interventions in preventing delirium in Intensive Care Units (ICU).

Methods

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the “Synthesis Without Meta-analysis” guidelines. The search was performed using the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov databases in April 2024. Eligibility criteria included patients admitted to Intensive Care Units, aged 18 or older exposed to risk factors for delirium, and with family members present; studies about family intervention to prevent delirium, that considered family as a partner in care and included interventions; studies that quantitatively assessed the effect of measures on the incidence and duration of delirium; interventional studies. Two authors independently applied these criteria using the Rayyan® application, assessing study quality with Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools.

Results

Fourteen studies were included, involving 33,232 patients. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to the highly heterogeneous results, but we concluded that the family participation interventions for delirium prevention were grouped into single-component and multi-component interventions. The single-component interventions, such as familiar voice messages, flexible visitation, and family presence, showed a favorable response in reducing delirium. The multicomponent interventions suggesting a positive effect included family visitation with professional-guided orientation; familiar voice messages for reorientation, newspaper reading, and nighttime eye patch use; sensory stimulation program; the ABCDEF bundle; the DyDel program; family education, emotional support, orientation training, cognitive stimulation, and ICU life care participation.

Conclusions

Several family participation interventions, both single-component and multicomponent, have shown positive effects on outcomes in preventing delirium in ICU patients, particularly in reducing its incidence and duration.

Implications for Clinical Practice

Identifying the family participation interventions that can prevent delirium allows the development of measures to minimize its occurrence in ICU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Delphi methodology – Part 3: Reporting standards, challenges, and biases Beyond communication: Integrating family and nurse perspectives on end-of-life care in the ICU – Letter on Palmryd et al. Fluid overload and competing risk: overlooked factors in ICU muscle ultrasound studies – Letter on Burgel et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): concerns regarding scope, conceptual framing, and evidence base – Letter on Cai et al. Exploring the potential impact of real-time ventilation feedback on the quality of manual bag ventilation in routine ICU practice. The FEED-BAG study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1